[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Рейдерське захоплення Бучаводоканалу
– СБУ повідомила про підозру трьом організаторам.
У серпні минулого року 10 озброєних добробатівців увірвалися на територію підприємства.
Погрожуючи фізичною розправою, вони не допускали працівників до обладнання, що спричинило перебої з водою у місті.
Труха
⚡
Київ
 |
Надіслати новину


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Вообще-то я абсолютно согласен с українським
☝
 журналистом из уна-унсо
Мосийчуком
, трансмутированным лично самим
☝
 Великим Князем Киевским Анатолием Первым Нетаким из мерзких рОгулей в  антибЕндерцы-антинацЫки.
Кремль за свои кровавые гривні устроил очередную провокацию против української нації. Снова подло навалил гімна козакам в шаровары. Платит по восемь своих росийських килогривень українським
☝
 военкомам за одну
шт
. голову пидпанованой худобы.  Геноцид!
Кто-нибудь, позвоните в Гаагу.
"
Максимальный оооор. "Не мобилизация, а диверсия москалей".
Чистейшее украинство
" - не сдержавшись, поделился украинофильским восторгом один украинофил.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
#ЦПД_повідомляє
:
🔻
У США планується антивоєнний мітинг з вимогою припинити військову допомогу Україні та розпочати мирні переговори.
🔹
Лібертаріанська та Народна партії США організовують мітинг під назвою «Лютуй проти воєнної машини». Під час мітингу спікери планують звернутися до президента Джо Байдена з низкою вимог, зокрема щодо війни в Україні. Серед них - "припинення фінансування війни" та заклик до "дипломатичного врегулювання конфлікту".
🔻
В оголошенні зустрічаються російські наративи про те, що розширення НАТО на схід спровокувало російське вторгнення, а війна проти України призвела до загрози ядерної війни з росією.
🔸
Серед запрошених спікерів - колишні політики, журналісти, активісти й музиканти, які раніше висловлювали проросійську риторику, включаючи колишню членкиню Демократичної партії США Тулсі Габбард та співзасновника Pink Floyd Роджера Вотерса.
🔸
Мітинг запланований на 19 лютого біля Меморіалу Лінкольна в центрі Вашингтона.
#stoprussia
TG
 |
FB
 |
INST
 |
YT
 |
TW
 |
TT


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Дело Коломойского начинают разваливать по процессуальным нарушениям.
Такова реакция Зеленского на «тёплый приём» во время визита в США.
По Коломойскому в США есть двухпартийный консенсус – экстрадиция и суд.
Сейчас бывшим собственникам Приватбанка Игорю Коломойскому и Геннадию Боголюбову в США выдвинуто обвинение в создании преступной сети – дело слушается Канцлерском суда штата Делавер, который принял решение о рассмотрении дела по процедуре акта RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act – закон, принятый в США для борьбы с организованной преступностью, разработан с целью преследования как юридических лиц, так и любой группы фактически объединённых людей), что не делает никаких различий между характером сообществ или организаций вовлечённых в процесс расследования, таким образом любая организация, хоть государственная, так и политическая, общественная, благотворительная даже неформальная вовлечённая в процесс автоматически становится объектом расследования.
В ходе рассмотрения этого дела дела в Канцлерском суде может быть установлен факт связи компаний Владимира Зеленского со структурами Игоря Коломойского и Геннадия Боголюбова и выводом $5,5 млрд из Приватбанка.
Простыми словами, Зеленский не получил гарантий безопасности и Коломойский остаётся в Украине.

https://t.me/beregpravy/5499


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Политолог, кандидат политических наук Александр Страхов (
@falconianthreads
) специально для «Консерватора»:

Украинские традиции

предательства
19 (29) октября 1657 года священник Максим Филимонович писал замечательному русскому просветителю, царскому другу Фёдору Ртищеву:
«Им
[малорусской верхушке]
не хочетца кабаков и панства своего отстать, купетства ради, а не посполитого добра; а царское б величество да изволил… в
Чернигов бы воеводу доброго прислать
».

Письмо написано 350 с лишним лет назад, но читатель, верно, уже прикинул эти печальные строки на современность и догадался, о чём пойдёт речь.
Малороссийская верхушка никогда не отличалась верностью и постоянством.

Возьмём список гетманов со времён Богдана Хмельницкого и посмотрим, на кого делала ставку неискушённая в малороссийских верхах царская власть.

После смерти Богдана Хмельницкого в 1657 году к власти пришёл его сын Юрий. Однако, будучи ещё юношей, он передал власть сподвижнику отца — Ивану Выговскому — и уехал учиться в Киев.

Иван Выговский по происхождению был поляком и в 1658 году подписал с Польшей Гадячский договор, фактически закончив восстание и вернувшись в подданство короля. Выговский участвовал в Конотопской битве, краеугольном камне украинской пропаганды. В 1664 году Выговский, которому чем-то не угодил король, втайне руководил антипольским восстанием и был расстрелян.
Две измены.

После измены Выговского гетманом стал Иван Беспалый, который никогда не переходил на сторону Польши, но добровольно сложил полномочия в пользу подросшего Юрия Хмельницкого, за что в благодарность был расстрелян. В 1660 году Юрий присягнул на верность польскому королю. Гетманом стал его дядя Яким Самко, малорусский мещанин, которого перед царём постоянно оклеветывал его конкурент — Иван Брюховецкий. В 1663 году в результате интриг епископа Мефодия — того самого священника Михаила, писавшего Ртищеву, — Брюховецкий казнил честнейшего Якима, что вызвало реакцию русских чиновников на местах:
«Свиньи учинились в начальстве и обрали в гетманы свинью»
, но до царя не дошло. В 1667 году Брюховецкий перешёл на сторону польского подданного, гетмана Петра Дорошенко, а после — на сторону Турции, но Дорошенко схватил Брюховецкого, небрежно махнул рукой — и того убили.
Итого: три измены.

Запутались? Это присказка, не сказка. Дорошенко тоже перешёл на сторону султана! Получив через несколько лет живительную встряску от русского воеводы Ромодановского, Дорошенко сдался и… получил воеводство на Вятке да имение под Москвой (тут уж читатель должен забиться в конвульсиях от смеха), где и скончался. Итого за всю карьеру Дорошенко набрал
 четыре измены
 и пока лидирует в нашем рейтинге.

Но в путаном списке предательств и перебежек мы потеряли тяжеловеса данного вида спорта. В 1662 году Юрий Хмельницкий отрёкся от гетманства, чтобы уйти в монастырь и страстно жалеть о своём решении. В 1668 году он радостно поддержал переход Дорошенко под турецкую власть, посидел в Константинополе консервной банкой и после падения Дорошенко был назначен гетманом. Прибыв в Малороссию, Юрий тут же начал строить планы о побеге к христианским государям, но под пристальным надзором турецкого паши остался «турецким» гетманом. В 1681 году турки его сместили, а в 1683 году назначили вновь. Через два года османский паша удушил опостылевшего всем Юрия Богдановича, чем оказал большую услугу вообще всем причастным: и султану, и царю, и королю, и Малороссии. Если честно, к концу рассказа
я и сам сбился со счёта, сколько и куда перебегал Юрий.

Даже из такого путаного рассказа видно, что предательство и измены — это modus operandi юго-западной элиты.
Так что, может, всё же прислушаться к совету Максима Филимоновича и не искать в Малороссии союзников, а «присылать воевод»?
Человек-то знал, о чём говорил.
Подписывайтесь на канал «Консерватор»


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Ці меседжі в тій чи іншій формі нам доносять наші партнери, ключові світові гравці, нажаль. Світ цинічний, політика - безмежно цинічна.
Вони дають нам зброю, щоб ми були достатньо сильними аби стримати російську навалу і не допустити війни в Європі, але не настільки сильними, щоб знищити росію і похитнути економічний зиск наших союзників.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User] В Киеве со здания КГГА отмывают краску, которой вчера облили табличку во время митинга с требованием к местной власти тратить деньги из бюджета на ВСУ, а не брусчатку и прочие невоенные траты.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Как иронично, однако, вышло с "регулированием винтиков"
👹

Остаться с нами в Телеграм
 |
Восхититься нашим YouTube


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Выжженная земля и полностью разрушенные многоэтажки
: Tg-каналы публикуют кадры из прифронтового Угледара.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Ближній бій. Як єгері ДШВ брали штурмом позиції росіян в районі Бахмута
Воїни 71-ї окремої єгерської бригади Десантно-штурмових військ Збройних Сил України розповідають як знищують  російських окупантів в районі Бахмута Донецької області.
– Бахмут – це справжня фортеця! – відзначають захисники України.
Разом до Перемоги! ДШВ – Завжди Перші! Слава Україні!
🇺🇦
🇺🇦
🇺🇦
#stoprussia

#ДШВ

#ЗСУ

#Завжди_Перші

#UkrainianAirAssaultForces
#AirAssaultForces

#WarInUkraine

#RussianAggression
#BattleOfUkrainianAirAssaultForces


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🟥
 росіяни створили «армію ботів», щоб сіяти «зраду» серед українців про Бахмут та ЗСУ. Розкриваємо всю схему брехунів

Армія рф не може взяти Бахмут, тому пропагандисти намагаються послабити ЗСУ, посіявши зневіру серед українців.
Центр стратегічних комунікацій разом зі Страткомом ЗСУ дослідили основні меседжі росіян, які сіють «зраду» довкола ситуації в місті-фортеці.
Які меседжи просувають пропагандисти та як працюють російські боти, читайте у нашому спільному матеріалі
👆
Підписуйтесь на
@SPRAVDI
 та
@AFUStratCom
 – щоб бути завжди в курсі інформаційних атак ворога.
👆

Telegram
 |
Сайт
 |
Instagram
 |
Twitter
 |
Facebook
 |
Viber


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Дорогие кировчане!
Поздравляем вас Днем Крещения Руси!
Крещение Руси – это знаковый и важный этап в истории становления русского православия и российской государственности. Крещение позволило сделать так, чтобы Россия процветала как экономически, культурно и духовно развитое государство.
Обращение Великого князя Владимира и всей Руси в православие имело определяющее значение для истории нашего Отечества и на протяжении более тысячи лет занимает особое место в жизни России.
Этот праздник возвращает нас к началам российской государственности, способствует сохранению памяти об истоках славянской культуры, духовности и объединению многонационального народа нашей Родины на основе принципов патриотизма, испокон веков укреплявшего государство.
Желаем вам крепкого здоровья, счастья и благополучия, новых свершений на благо города Кировское!


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🇺🇦
🎥
🇺🇦

Про современных иезуитов или как информационно перебивали тему утверждения в стране концлагеря
Сегодня депутаты проголосовали 100% антинародный закон. Почему антинародный? Потому что он не устраивает ни армию - не разрешил демобилизацию, ни народ - вводит меры драконовской мобилизации!
Итак как офисные помойки и ермасята пытались переубедить общественность, что ничего страшного не произошло:
✅
 начали с пряника - пообещали 70 тысяч тем, кто на передовой.
О том, как лишали предыдущих льгот, как считают, кто на передовой, а кто нет - умолчали;
✅
потом пошли "кнуты" -  Чмут, рассказавший, что нужно мобилизовать с 20 лет.
Задумка - все должны радоваться, что мобилизовать пока будут "ЛИШЬ" с 25;
✅
затем - нардеп Марьяна Безуглая, поддержавшая мобилизацию женщин "иначе будем уничтожены".
А женщин же пока не гребут - ну вот, опять "демократия", радуйтесь глупцы - классный Закон
;
✅
Потом рассказали как много за время Большой войны заработал Порошенко.
Страна воюет, а Крыголам богатеет - ату его!;
✅
Но больше всего нас порадовало, что офисные помойки и ермасята "вдруг" заметили мирный план Эрдогана Стамбул-2. Через Новую Газету вбросили описание опубликованных документов. Но упоминать, что  первыми их опубликовали наши коллеги из Резидента, конечно, не стали. И вся «офисная» помойка по команде отработала нарратив.
И документы и предложения Эрдогана по условиям мира игнорировали 3 недели! Не смотря на заявления о них Лаврова и Шойгу.
 Вспомнили только когда понадобилось дать народу надежду - пусть отвлекутся от закона ложной надеждой о мире.
Почитали комментарии на этих помойках - работают боты. Причём одни и те же. Не позволяют дискуссии скатится к войне до 1991 года. Пусть пипл потешится возможным миром.
А для патриотов вышел Подоляк и заявил, что только 1991 год.
Итого, всех развели по чатам и каждому дали своё
🤷
О том, что Зеленский под давлением США, как мы писали, отказался от предложения Эрдогана - ни слова. Иезуиты, что с них возьмёшь!
Кстати, лишний раз спалился наш ермасёнок-Миша. Тоже написал про инициативу, как про новую, прямо как Труха и ко. Конечно, его подписчики в чате сразу поправили, но он сделал вид, что не заметил. Заказ отработал, побеждал дальше, благо, новостей много, быстро забывается.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User] Зеленському сьогодні показали карту з зеленими зонами, які ще два дні тому були червоними, і на вулицях Бахмута теж. Недарма приїхав.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Российские крылатые ракеты Х-22, которыми был нанесён удар по Киеву, неуязвимы для украинской противовоздушной обороны
Об этом сообщил американский журнал Military Watch Magazine. Издание утверждает, что официальные лица Украины сетуют на то, что ракеты этого типа невозможно перехватить. Они были разработаны для обхода многоуровневой системы ПВО.
@radiomirby
Странно. Те же самые официальные лица постоянно заявляют, что украинская ПВО сбила все российские ракеты... Или это не те же самые лица?


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Свята — це час, коли кожному хочеться бути поряд із рідними. Близько 1000 бійців 12-ї бригади спеціального призначення
#Азов
 позбавлені цієї можливості вже 19 місяців.
Мужні воїни-оборонці Маріуполя, які стримували наступ противника, завʼязавши на себе переважаючі сили ворога, виграли час для всієї країни.
Ми памʼятаємо про них щосекунди та продовжуємо боротьбу, аби повернути з полону кожного. З полону, що вбиває.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🇺🇦
«
Мы не остановимся, пока мы не вернем себе свой город, наш Мариуполь, наш дом»
Об этом заявил Илья Самойленко, офицер управления разведки «Азова», во время Киевского форума безопасности.
«Мы не останемся в истории героями одной битвы. Еще все сражения впереди».


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
❗
Полиция опубликовала видео с расследование страшного
расстрела
 на Глушко
ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
Прислать Новость


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🤡

"Я в бешенстве, русский город утюжат", - кремлівський пропагандист Соловйов про деокупацію Шебекіно
Пропагандисти визнають досягнення російських добровольців у Бєлгородській області. Приємно.
@censor_net
| Ми у
Facebook
 та
 Twitter