[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Знову театр абсурду на кордоні.
Маю підписане відрядження головою Верховної Ради, але прикордонники мене не пропустили.
Я далекий від думки, що прикордонники діяли за власної ініціативи. Кожен може сам здогадатися, хто ж скасував документ, підписаний спікером парламенту.
У Польщі та США у мене заплановані десятки зустрічей.
З поляками я мав говорити про зняття блокади наших перевізників на кордоні. З американцями — про забезпечення фінансування воєнної допомоги, яка майже вичерпалася цього року, під загрозою в майбутньому. А без неї нам росію не перемогти.
Ситуація надзвичайно складна. Тому акцент в програмі — на проблемних республіканцях. Зірвано мою зустріч з новим спікером палати представників Джонсоном.
Тому те, що відбулося сьогодні на кордоні — це не дрібне шкідництво. Це —  антиукраїнська диверсія. Це не просто перешкоджання дипломатичній роботі всієї моєї команди. А, на жаль, удар по обороноздатності України.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Путин и Лукашенко пожали друг другу руки после слов Токаева о высоком уровне интеграции России и Беларуси по формуле "Две страны — одно государство".
"
У них даже ядерное оружие одно на двоих сейчас", — отметил Токаев.
Тонкий намек на будущие слияние РФ и РБ от токаев?


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Российский военнослужащий предельно точно описывает ситуацию после прилета украинского FPV-дрона в транспорт оккупантов.
Осторожно, на видео присутствует "высококультурный" диалог.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Как далеко дедушка от реального мира…Байден заявил:
«Си Цзиньпин хочет получить крупнейшую в мире экономику и самые большие возможности в военной сфере, но не стремится к войне с США или территориальной экспансии».
Интересно зачем Китаю большие возможности в военной сфере? Конечно Китай не собирается воевать с США, но с Тайванем…


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Пойма... Что происходит, не пойму?
Со вчерашнего вечера, а особенно сегодня на утро, у российских оккупантов произошёл жутчайший экзистенциальный кризис, ведь согласно некой информации, СОУ
🇺🇦
освободили и контролируют маленькое село Пойма, на левом берегу Херсонской области, а так же была попытка захода в село Песчанка.
Отмечу, что никаких официальных подтверждений данных событий со стороны Украины не поступало, а потому, источниками этой информации пока являются только Z-телеги и прочие паникующие российские говорящие головы. И паниковать есть чему.
Ранее я неоднократно писал об уникальности левобережной Херсонщины и её серой зоне, живущей по своим правилам и неконтролируемо разрастающейся. Именно из-за того, что комбриг 205-й ОМСБр регулярно отправлял личный состав на возвращение позиций в серой зоне, разразился прошлым летом у оккупантов скандал. Просто никто из серой зоны не возвращался, ну и позиции аналогично не возвращались под контроль РОВ.
Сколько комбриг 205-ео загубил там личного состава, вопрос интересный, но на данный момент - второстепенный.
Серая зона, на сейчас, практически подобралась к населённым пунктам и готова их поглотить. А в последние две недели российская авиация как с цепи сорвалась, регулярно нанося удары КАБами по правому берегу и серой зоне на левом берегу. Так называемые Z-военкоры поясняли это попытками российского командования сорвать некое наступление СОУ.
Так, неужели поглощение началось?
Не знаю, без понятия, но оккупантам есть за что нервничать.
Они в один голос вопят об угрозе по линии Пещановка-Подстепное-Казачьи Лагеря-Крынки. И эту линию можно рассматривать как полноценный рубеж, но главное это то, что нависает над очень важно логистической артерией 2206, переходящей в трассу М14 на Мелитополь.
Но важнее всего то, Пойма это село находящееся на одном уровне с Олешками и менее чем в двух километрах от развилки 2206 и Е97.
Кроме того, я всегда отмечал, что ГВ "Днепр", в зону ответственности которой входит левобережка, одна из худших по комплектации и боеспособности во всей зоне БД. Хуже ГВ "Днепр" только ГВ "Обороны Крыма". Кроме того, наиболее боеспособные подразделения с левобережки ещё в августе перебросили для усиления Запорожской области, треугольника Новопрокоповка-Вербовое-Очеретуватое.
И я не исключаю, что волосы на пятой точке у российского командования седеют не то, чтобы от мысли о некое наступлении, а банально даже от проникновения среднестатистической ДРГ.
Ведь, серая зона подкралась не в результате масштабного наступления, а посредством умеренного и вполне будничного действия небольших групп соответствующего функционала. И это будет невероятно, если вопрос плацдарма будет решён посредством оперирования малыми группами. Но это лишь мысли вслух, поскольку...
Поскольку, мне ровным счётом неизвестно о том, что там сейчас происходит, а у страха, как известно, глаза велики. Но, у любой серой зоны есть одной неизменное от климатических условий свойство - со временем они меняют свой цвет.
Слава нації!


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
русня знову намагається пиздити українські пісні
🤬
 На цей раз переклали на уруzzкій пісню Христини Соловій «Тримай»
😵💫
Це якийсь код нації: спиздити і зробити гірше
💩


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🍓
Бесплатные торговые места в Москве получат производители клубники и земляники Херсонщины
Фермерам нашего региона, которые выращивают клубнику и землянику предоставят бесплатные площадки, расположенные вблизи жилого, пешеходного и транспортного сектора, для эффективной реализации урожая региона.
Более того, Правительство Москвы безвозмездно выделит торговые конструкции, чтобы разместить фрукты.
В этом году Херсонская область
ожидает
 большой объем урожая душистой ягоды, который развезут по разным регионам России.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Много кто отреагировал на пост про джйотиш и просили доказательства!
Доказательства очень просты:
1881
1917
1953
1989
2025
В западной астрологии это циклы Сатурн+Нептун, в джйотиш Сатурн+Варуна.
Цикл 36 лет - это в первую очередь поворотные точки ОБЩЕСТВЕННОГО СОЗНАНИЯ.
Миропонимания.
И уже как следствие - политических и экономических потрясений и изменений.
Поэтому Путин и Зеленский неизбежно уйдут, их время заканчивается, они свое сделали.
Дальше вершить историю будут совсем другие люди, которые поведут свои страны совсем другим путем. Путем объединения.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Як воюють прикордонники в Серебрянському лісі

▪
Невпинний вогонь артилерії і штурми позицій – ось, з чим стикаються українські захисники на позиціях в Серебрянському лісі.
▪
Ще однією особливістю цієї ділянки фронту є річка Сіверський Донець. Українські позиції розташовані по обидва боки, через що військовим доводиться постійно переправлятись через водну артерію.
📌
В яких умовах доводиться тримати оборону, які переваги мають українські сили оборони і чим відповідають на атаки росіян військові ДПСУ – дивіться в матеріалі.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Гюнтер Фелінгер, економіст, голова Австрійського комітету з членства в НАТО для України: "Рекомендую Зеленському звільнити Єрмака і перемога буде гарантована."
Зе зрада:
І там уже порохобіти пробралися? Нікак нашому бубочці не дадуть спокою!
Зеленський краще Україну здасть рашке, чим звільнить своїх подельників ермака та татарова.
Піаніст сказав, що піде разом з ним. Пупутного вітра по дорозі в Гаагу.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🇺🇦
СТАНЬ ЕЛІТОЮ ЗБРОЙНИХ СИЛ УКРАЇНИ! ВСТУПАЙ В ІНСТИТУТ ВІЙСЬКОВО-МОРСЬКИХ СИЛ! Курсанти забезпечуються проживанням, харчуванням, формою одягу та грошовим утриманням. Всі флотські спеціальності відкриті для хлопців і дівчат. ПРИЄДНУЙСЯ ДО МАЙБУТНІХ ГЕРОЇВ МОРЯ! ОБИРАЙ ШЛЯХ МОРСЬКОГО ОФІЦЕРА!
🇺🇦
#ВВНЗ_2024

#ua_naval_institute_team

#ВІРЮвЗСУ


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Больше $800 млн заплатила Украина в 2022 году западным поставщикам оружия по полностью или частично не выполненным контрактам.
 Часть западной военной техники не была поставлена Киеву, а другая оказалась в таком плохом положении, что
годилось только для разбора на запчасти
, пишет The New York Times со ссылкой на документы украинского правительства.
Собеседники газеты, участвовавшие в закупке оружия, заявили, что
пропавшее оружие в конце концов было частично доставлено, в других случаях посредники вернули деньги
. Но ряд контрактов на начало весны 2023 года так и не был выполнен.
По словам одного из источников,
по состоянию на начало весны 2023 года сотни миллионов долларов были уплачены, в том числе государственным компаниям, за оружие, которое так и не было поставлено
.
Заместитель министра обороны Владимир Гаврилов подтвердил, что
были случаи, когда Украина платила деньги, но не получала оружие
. В этом году правительство начало анализировать свои прошлые закупки и исключать проблемных подрядчиков.
Впрочем, NYT подчеркивает, что
масштабы закупок оружия очень глобальны, поэтому проблемы со снабжением неизбежны
.
"Многие поставки от западных союзников включали современное оружие, такое как американские системы противовоздушной обороны, которые доказали свою высокую эффективность против российских беспилотников и ракет. Но в других случаях
союзники предоставляли устаревшее оборудование, которое в лучшем случае требовало капитального ремонта
.
Около 30 процентов киевского арсенала находится на ремонте постоянно
 – высокий показатель, по словам экспертов по вопросам обороны, для армии, которая нуждается в любом оружии", – пишет издание.
Например, во время поставок 33 самоходных гаубиц, подаренных итальянским правительством, оказалось, что
у одной из них есть проблемы с двигателем, а у другой – вытекает охлаждающая жидкость
. В Италии объяснили, что эти установки вывели из эксплуатации много лет назад, но Украина попросила их "капитально отремонтировать и ввести в эксплуатацию, учитывая насущную потребность в средствах для противостояния российской агрессии". За этот ремонт Министерство обороны заплатило $19,8 млн. В январе 13 из этих гаубиц были отправлены в Украину, но
прибыли "непригодными для выполнения боевых задач"
, указано в одном из документов украинского правительства.
Украина обвинила американскую компанию, занимавшуюся ремонтом, в провале контракта
. Директор Департамента оборонных закупок Министерства обороны Украины Владимир Пикузо в письме к генеральному инспектору Пентагона написал: "
Американская компания, предлагая свои услуги, не намеревалась выполнять свои обязательства
".
В то же время в компании отрицали обвинения, заявив, что
украинцы не обеспечили надлежащего обслуживания гаубиц после их передачи
. Это касается, в частности, установки, из которой вытекла охлаждающая жидкость после поставки в Украину.
Как пишет NYT,
украинские чиновники в основном воздерживались от жалоб на неисправную технику
, чтобы не ставить в неудобное положение поставщиков. Высокопоставленный украинский чиновник сказал, что
правительство устало уверять, что западного оружия достаточно
. Часть вооружения в непригодном состоянии и годится только на запчасти.
Официально Минобороны Украины не предоставило комментариев на запрос NYT по этому поводу.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
⚡
Канцлер ФРГ Шольц заявляет, что "Байден лучше Трампа", и поэтому хочет, чтобы он был переизбран, — Reuters


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Судя по сложившейся ситуации в Одессе в ходе мобилизации, сотрудники ТАК давно уже не соблюдают закон и на имеющиеся документы им все равно. Притом, что пока ещё в стране не утвердили законопроект о мобилизации.
Как можно понять, мужчина показал пенсионное удостоверение касаемо инвалидности 3-ей группы, но ему ответили, что оно не освобождает от призыва и вообще «это фальшивка».


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Холодний вітер Донбасу, ворожа артилерія та БПЛА, лід, бруд, гаряча недопита кава, бо знову лунає "До бою!". Думки линуть додому, а тіло наводить гармату.
Їм важко, але вони роблять свою роботу.
72 ОМБр ім. Чорних Запорожців
#72_бригада

#Чорні_Запорожці

#обличчя_переможців

#обличчя_захисників


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🔞
Эпичные кадры стрелкового боя со стороны ВСУ запечатленные на action камеру на Бахмутовском направлении.
Дата съёмки неизвестна.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
❗
Дневная сводка Штаба территориальной обороны ДНР на 29 января 2023 года
Российские войска продолжают освобождать населенные пункты Донецкой Народной Республики, ранее находившиеся под контролем ВФУ.
По данным Представительства ДНР в СЦКК, противник открывал огонь по территории Донецкой Народной Республики с применением РСЗО HIMARS и 155-мм ствольной артиллерии. Под обстрелы ВФУ попали районы 5 населенных пунктов Республики. Повреждены 11 домостроений и 3 объекта гражданской инфраструктуры. Общее количество примененных украинскими боевиками боеприпасов — 156 единиц.
В результате
обстрелов
 ВФУ на территории Донецкой Народной Республики получил ранения 2 мирных жителя.
🔺
Штаб территориальной обороны ДНР призывает население использовать только проверенную информацию из официальных источников.
Будьте внимательны, не поддавайтесь паническим вбросам из сторонних каналов информации, пользуйтесь проверенными данными.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Трамп, критикуючи допомогу Україні, назвав Володимира Зеленського «одним з найкращих продавців в історії»
На передвиборчому мітингу колишній президент США звинуватив українського главу держави в тому, що він нібито вимагає грошей від Штатів.
"Вони повинні повернути нам гроші. Дайте їм гроші у кредит. Або видайте рахунок на 60 млрд. Я вам кажу, Зеленський один з найкращих продавців в історії: кожного разу, коли він приїжджає, то повертається додому з $50-60 млрд".
В свою чергу, Байден відповів на постійні закиди Трампа щодо свого віку:
"Один кандидат у президенти США занадто старий і психічно непридатний для того, щоб бути президентом. Інший — це я", — пожартував Байден про 77-річного Трампа.
Україна Online | Підписатись


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Черговий алкодвіж у приймальному відділенні Першої міської лікарні
🥴

«Учора Перша міська лікарня відзначилася двічі.
О 13:37 було спрацювання тривожної кнопки. До приймального відділення каретою швидкої було доставлено людину ймовірно в стані алкогольного сп'яніння. Чоловік поводився дуже неадекватно. Процес супроводжувався нецензурною лайкою, він зовсім не реагував на зауваження. На місці працювали Поліція охорони, екіпажи "Муніципальної варти" та Патрульної поліції.
17:51. На спрацювання тривожної кнопки група швидкого реагування "Муніципальна варта" прибула вдруге. Ситуація схожа. Автомобілем швидкої допомоги до приймального відділення було доставлено чоловіка ймовірно в стані алкогольного сп'яніння. Чоловік не реагував на зауваження, намагався роздягнутися. Спільними зусиллями працівників "Муніципальної варти" та медперсоналу вдалося припинити "стриптиз" в приймальному відділенні та вивести чоловіка за межі території лікарні.»
Підписатися
 •
Надіслати новину
•
TT
 •
IG
 •
TW
 •
FB