[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Майже не заходжу в фейсбук, а коли заходжу то переконуюсь, що правильно роблю, що майже не заходжу.
За 5 хвилин скролінга, двічі трапилась фотка окупанта, з підписом: допоможіть знайти хлопчика (і ще десяток постів типу: "ніхто не вітає мене з днем народження, на фотках там теж начебто наші військові)
При переході на сторінки авторів виявилось, що їхні сторінки повністю і всеціло присвячені нашим військовим в російському полоні.
Я вже писав що розповсюджуючі цю інформацію, ви робите тільки гірше полоненим, і ускладнюєте їхнє повернення додому, але справа тут не в корисних іді... не в небайдужих громадянах, а в тому що якби СБУ перевірила ці сторінки (зв'язки авторів), то виявила би для себе дуже багато цікавого.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02kzdkQhoQbaMtC4TevRZcfXxUvLgar4ovtEACR5V8ZS2VDrg72AZ1it3BB3TENxhfl&id=100015197081329


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
💥
На цих фото – перший уламок війни, що потрапив у НАДС. На той час війна тривала місяць.  Ми зберігаємо цей рваний шматок «русского міра» як скальп знищеного ворога. Як межу між миром і війною.
👥
У команді НАДС – 12 героїв, які пішли на війну і захищають Україну зі зброєю в руках. А загалом майже чотири тисячі наших колег з усієї України з часу повномасштабного вторгнення вступили до лав ЗСУ. На жаль, підтверджено загибель 108 з них. Ще 205 службовців – зникли безвісти.
🙏
Наш невимовний біль – Олександр Якубенко, начальник Міжрегіонального управління НАДС у Києві, Київській, Чернігівській та Черкаській областях. 17 липня він загинув в бою за Україну.
🔰
Війна завдає усім невиліковних ран. Але попри біль і втрати державна служба зберегла керованість країною. Більше 165 тисяч держслужбовців тримають свої напрямки в обороні держави. У найважчі дні і години ми зберегли дієвість управлінської вертикалі. Переважна більшість державних службовців лишилися вірними присязі та народу України.
🇺🇦
Слава Україні!


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Основний ресурс та цінність української армії – її люди.
Все нове озброєння, яке нам приходить із країн-союзників, саме по собі не стріляє. Іноземці, за винятком добровольців, не воюватимуть за нашу країну.
Світові лідери не надсилатимуть своїх військових в Україну боротися за нашу свободу.
Такими є реалії.
Бахмут - справжній щит Донбасу, але водночас це важкий театр бойових дій, у якому щодня ми втрачаємо найкращих воїнів, сьогоднішня новина про Да Вінчі тому підтвердження.
Нація має готуватися до затяжної війни, молодь має виховувати у собі воїнів, розвиватися, займатися спортом, отримувати навички медицини, поводження зі зброєю, тактики ведення бою, тощо.
Наш мобілізаційний ресурс у рази нижчий за російський, тому єдиний варіант встановити паритет сил - підходити до питання якістю. Для цього не потрібно чекати на повістку, а вже зараз йти до підрозділів Сил оборони України, або ж до добровільчих підрозділів, таких як наш.
НЕМІЧЕВ
🇺🇦


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Божевільне таксі. З неопублікованого
Є в мене ну дуже хороший знайомий, який через те шо не дуже любить динири, був вимушений виїхати з Донецька в 2018 році фактично в тому, в чому був одягнутий.
Але то все деталі, головне шо живим залишився і то є добре. Ну і плюс лікарі наші врятували ногу йому після виїзду і витягнули кулю. Одним словом, бігати вже не зможе, але дві ноги - це краще, ніж одна і це факт(сарказм)
Людина не скаржиться на тетшо почала життя з нуля після 40 років - вона мовчки перевезла сім'ю до міста ххх, а не верещить про те шо йому всі винні, бо він був там, куди хуй хто зможе пролізти. Так, його хату в Донецьку віджали орки у підсумку, проте він вважає свій випадок не найгіршим варіантом і ну дуже хоче приїхати на зачистку, шоб висповідати деяких друзів дитинства, поговорити про добро і зло та про наслідки
Але то все буде потім. Зараз людина працює, як ви самі можете здогадатися, в таксі. На власному авто, з донецьким номерами
І в цьому його фішка - коли вата сідає в таке авто, то ну дуже часто починає його вважати за братана, якому ну дуже важко жити серед біндер прахлятих. Але людина, замість того шоб тупо пиздити вату, як це було на початку, коли він виїхав, знайшла спосіб доводити худобу і до істерики, і до сказу, і до сліз одночасно:
Він просто мовчки слухає шо та хуйня пиздить про біндер, підримує розмову, а потім... зачиняє всі двері в авто і каже шось в стилі - а теперь тебе пиздец. Я тебя сейчас завезу в СБУ и там с тобой о твоих проблемах с биндерами парни поговорят. Молись, сука-.
І чувак дійсно везе цю всю пиздоту в напрямку до місцевого СБУ, з абсолютно кам'яним виразом обличчя, хитро посміхаючись.
Сказати шо у вати після таких слів істерика - це значить нічого не сказати. Зі слів таксиста, були навіть випадки, коли він вимушений був робити хімчистку авто - вата залишала всю свою злість по відношенню до біндер на задньому сидінні авто(за Русь усрусь, так би мовити).
Проте людина продовжує це робити регулярно(виносити ватанам мізки) і навіть досягла деяких успіхів - його авто знають місцеві ватани і як тільки бачать шо він їде на виклик саме до них, то роблять все можливе, шоб не їхати з ним. Причина - людина дала їм останній шанс на те шоб виправитись + обіцяла завезти не тільки в СБУ, а й в район Авдіївки і вже там згодувати цю свиню бездомним собакам
Людині абсолютно похуй, якої статі ватан-пасажир. Похуй на сльози, вмовляння, матюки та прокльони. Його коронна фішка - це запропонувати ваті вибір:
або їдемо в СБУ, або їдемо зараз до нотаріуса і робимо обмін житлом - моя квартира в Донецьку на твою. Забув - там асєтіни живуть, але то вже не мої, а твої проблеми. Так куди їдемо, бррратан?
Ну або сєстрічка
Не повірите, але жоден ватоголовий ні разу не запропонував їхати до нотаріуса - їбані лицеміри завжди робили вибір на користь СБУ і не хотіли обмінятися житлом.
Найцікавіше, до речі те, як людина пояснює мету своїх дій, бо звучить це приблизно так:
"Я хочу, чтобы эта вся хуйня выла и ссалась рот открывать в принципе. Место ваты вне оккупации - под плинтусом. И я буду тем, кто эту хуйню туда будет постоянно загонять".
Так, людина відверто ловить кайф від того, як виє та верещить вся ця срань господня, коли розуміє шо людина з Донецька, переселенець, не шуткує і справді має намір завезти пиздоглуздувате не за вказаною в замовленні адресою, а в СБУ. Так, в нього постійно проблеми на службі, бо ватани мають звичку скаржитися на те, шо вадітіль нєадикватний і кідаєцца на людєй.
Але дядько і не думає зупинятися. Особливо зараз. Бо в перший тиждень вторгнення привіз прям до будівлі СБУ в місті ххх двох кацапів + декілька разів коригувальників з числа місцевої вати і зміг довести причетність їх до співпраці з рф за допомогою відео з авто (в машині немає мертвих зон і встановлені камери, через що він і вимушений був виїхати з Донецька, але то вже зовсім друга історія)
Мораль. Уявляєте єбало ватана, якому за межами окупованих кажуть - слышь ты, хуйня... я тебя сейчас в багажник кину, скормлю собакам под Авдеевкой... пизда тебе, ватан ебаный. Я из Донецка- ?


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Сигнали кремлівського диктатора є чіткими та зрозумілими – путінський режим налаштований на довгострокову війну з Україною і проти усього Заходу.
Його мета – знищення української державності та анексія українських земель, встановлення контролю над Європою як мінімум в межах «Ялти». «Мирний план путіна» – це анексія України та капітуляція Заходу в дусі російських проектів безпекових угод грудня 2021 року.
Наша спільна відповідь є очевидною – більше зброї для перемоги ЗСУ на полі бою, «пекельні» санкції для знищення російської економіки, повалення путінського режиму та притягнення його до міжнародної відповідальності, а також членство України в ЄС та НАТО.
Разом до перемоги!


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
❗
60% українців вважають, що у 2023 році рівень корупції в Україні виріс, -
дослідження
Згідно з результатами опитування, зростання рівня корупції в 2023 році відзначають 61,2% населення, що в понад два рази більше, ніж у 2022-му, та 46,3% представників бізнесу, що майже втричі перевищує показник 2022 року.
Батальон «Монако»
💎

З питань реклами


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🛍
Ну що, ЗСУшники, виплатам таки бути)
👀
Всі бачили нещодавню
Санта-Барбару з цими додатковими грошовими винагородами
, спричинених останніми змінами в законодавсті.
🤡
Але у військових все завжди туго - для реалізації процесу
потрібен відомчий наказ
 і одразу його видали у всіх відомствах, крім МОУ
🫠
🙏
Проте всі молитви МОУ почуло, тримайте -
Наказ МОУ від 26.09.2023 N566 Про затвердження Змін до Порядку виплати грошового забезпечення військовослужбовцям Збройних Сил України та деяким іншим особам.
➡
Тепер процес запущено, думаю в перших числах жовтня можна очікувати на виплати))
Офіцер ✙
 | Підписатись


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Bakhmut ,,, grandfather takes revenge on the Russians for the destroyed house ...
Дед попросил у ЗСУ автомат чтобы отомстить за разбитую хату...


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Не знаю, що там наговорив вже про Крим і Донбас Зеленський на зустрічі зі студентами у Миколаєві.
Знаю лише одне: у влади як не було, так і немає якогось нормального плану стосовно інтеграції цих окупованих територій та людей до України.
Те, що вони пропонують, яку гуманітарну політику проводять, веде лише до розколу суспільства, і не більше.
Вже привело.
P. S. До речі, саме внаслідок такої тупорилої та недалекоглядної політики і з'являються так звані "ждуни".
Але це вже тема для іншого та з іншими разговору. Ці дебіки все одно не зрозуміють.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User] "По данным Bloomberg, Россия — самая "подсанкционная" страна в мире — завершит 2023 год с прибылью в 75 миллиардов долларов. А по данным New York Times, США — страна с самым большим в мире долгом — закончит 2023 год с убытками в два триллиона долларов",  — написал немецко-финский предприниматель Ким Дотком в "Х".


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
А вот и заявление одного сенатора.
США не может ждать 2-3 месяца иначе НАТО распадется…
Никто уже не говорит про Украинский народ и спасения нас как нации.
Украинцы в лице США ресурс.
НАТО себя давно изжило, особенно после падание ракет на территории Польши и обвинения нас в этом.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
🇵🇱
🇺🇦
 Польські фермери продовжують блокувати рух вантажівок у напрямку пунктів пропуску «Долгобичув — Угринів», «Дорогуськ — Ягодин» та «Гребенне — Рава-Руська»,
розповів
 «Суспільному» речник ДПСУ. У чергах перед цими пунктами стоїть близько 400 вантажівок. У напрямку «Ягодин» найбільше.
Також залишаються черги на раніше розблокованих напрямках. Особливо на напрямках пунктів «Краківець» і «Шегині».
@babel


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Можливості для аграрних переробних підприємств, орієнтованих на експорт
Програма USAID з аграрного і сільського розвитку (АГРО) надасть співфінансування для 20 українських аграрних переробних підприємств для відновлення та розвитку експортного потенціалу. Підприємства можуть отримати співфінансування, щоб досягти таких результатів:
◾
Збільшити обсяги закупівлі та переробки сировини, зокрема, налагоджуючи довгострокове партнерство з мікро, малими та середніми агровиробниками,
◾
Запровадити нові технології та практики переробки продукції зернових, щоб збільшити продуктивність щонайменше на 25%,
Подробиці -
https://1ll.ink/wbF8g
Також слідкуйте за новинами Міністерства
⬇

Facebook-
https://www.facebook.com/mapfu2021

Viber -
https://bit.ly/3PW6Rrm

YouTube -
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPSczga0I1kCe0OzVVdfIqw

Twitter -
http://twitter.com/Ministry_agroUA


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Рівненський виробник молочки оновлює продукцію
👍
📍
 Відвідав ТОВ «РАДИВИЛІВМОЛОКО», яке випускає товари під торговою маркою «Радимо».
💪
 Підприємство є передовиком на економічному фронті Рівненщини. За час повномасштабного вторгнення вони не зупинились, а навпаки збільшили виробництво та кількість робочих місць на 80 осіб.
✅
 За цей час тут також встановили нову лінію розфасовки молока в ПЕТ-пляшку. А зараз монтують сучасне потужне обладнання та готують нову форму упаковки – стакани. У них продаватимуться йогурти та сметана.
📍
 Молоко привозять з Рівненщини, Вінниці, Волині, Хмельниччини, Тернопільщини. Вчергове переконуюсь, що коли в області є підприємства з повним циклом – від вироблення до переробки – то уся екосистема працює правильно. Ті програми підтримки тваринництва, які Рівненська ОДА запустила в минулому році, дали свій результат. Кількість виробленого молока в області збільшується, а відтак і переробка зростає.
✔
 До речі, ТОВ «РАДИВИЛІВМОЛОКО» за результатами інспектувань підтвердили відповідність процесу виробництва молочних продуктів вимогам законодавства Європейського Союзу та отримали так званий єврономер.  Це дозволило їм експортувати свою продукцію до Польщі, Німеччини, Нідерландів, Азербайджану, Марокко, Молдови, Литви тощо.
👍
 На цьому «Радимо» не зупиняється. Нині розглядають можливість запустити лінію виробництва молока довготривалого зберігання. І точно планують збільшувати лінії по виробництву твердого сиру.
🤝
 Торік вони сплатили 87,9 млн гривень податків. Радий, що в нашому регіоні маємо таке потужне підприємство. Яке створює робочі місця і додає у розвитку області. ТОВ «РАДИВИЛІВМОЛОКО» - надійний боєць «економічного фронту» Рівненщини.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
От заседаний в Госдуме до доставки гуманитарки в Херсонскую область и ведение урока мужества в школе
:
Игорь Кастюкевич в одной из школ  Скадовского района Херсонщины проверил уровень знаний старшеклассников в области истории периода 1941-1945 годов.
🟢
 «Никогда не вел уроки, но тут попробовал себя в роли учителя истории. Прикрепляю видео»
, - сообщил координатор гуманитарной миссии "Единой России" в Херсонской области Игорь Кастюкевич
🟢
 «Поговорили о Великой Отечественной войне. Оказалось, никто из ребят и не знает, почему ее у нас называют именно так, а не как на Западе – II мировой. Теперь людей, знающих ответ на этот вопрос, стало больше.
Детей истории или не учили вовсе, или преподавали ее по извращенной американской схеме, надо исправлять, всем вместе»,
 - резюмировал Кастюкевич.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
СТАРГОРОД ПРАЦЕВЛАШТОВУЄ КОЛАБОРАНТІВ?
Багато пабліків сьогодні написали, що це просто схожа людина.
Але виявилося, що це Анна Евсюкова  з міста Куп’янск, який був окупований і в якому вона співпрацювала з окупантами.
Можливо ви запитаєте, а що їй потрібно було робити в окупації? Щонайменше, не співпрацювати з окупантами! Як це робили і роблять сотні тисяч українців, в кого не вийшло виїхати, котрі попри загрозу життю допомагають Україні.
Мало того, що вона співпрацює, так ще і не соромиться зніматись у цих постановочних відеороліках.
В листопаді минулого року її затримали відповідні служби. Але як бачимо Анна себе добре почуває і не несе відповідальності за те, що вона коїла.
Нагадую, для тих хто забув. Люди, що стали колаборантами в наших містах, повинні, в першу чергу, нести відповідальність. Мінімум кримінальну.
Вони створювали комфорте життя, зустрічали, годували, приймали вдома окупантів, тому мають відповідати за свої справи.
Для таких є гарна робота: відбудова міст після їхніх друзів.
Звертаюсь до керівництва Старгорода та всього бізнеса. Беручи на роботу та даючи, якійсь соціальний пакет таким людям, ви заоохочуєте їх. Вони відчувають свою безкарність і стають обличчям вашого бізнесу, через що, ви втрачаєте довіру.
Багато питань від військових, що боронили і звільняли наші міста, і Купʼянськ в тому числі, що ж відбувається.
Тому чекаю адекватну реакцію від Старгорода.


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
У кожного свої засоби психологічного впливу на хробаків. Андрій Попик, потішили, дякую
Відео не качай, воно тут:
youtu.be/yvX719dxALg?si=yq0QrwRJ-NghTDJN
Канал Андрій Попик- гібридна війна:
https://t.me/apopyk
МАДЯР
🇺🇦
22.11.23
https://t.me/robert_magyar


[System]
You are an expert in the appeal_to_fear manipulation technique. Appeal to Fear: Uses fear to influence the audience, often exaggerating risks or consequences. List phrases that provide evidence of appeal_to_fear in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the appeal_to_fear manipulation.
To enhance the effectiveness of classifying statements as "Appeal to Fear" or not, it's essential to establish clear guidelines that address the nuances within the language. This will help reduce false positives (statements incorrectly classified as Appeals to Fear) and false negatives (statements that should be classified but aren't). Below are the classification guidelines tailored to your needs:

### Classification Guidelines for Identifying "Appeal to Fear"

1. **Identify Emotional Triggers**:
    - Look for words or phrases that evoke strong emotions, particularly fear or anxiety. Examples include "danger," "threat," "attack," "attackers," "panic," "terror," etc.
    - Phrases that suggest grave consequences, such as "you could lose everything" or "your life is at risk," should be flagged.

2. **Assess the Context**:
    - Consider the context surrounding the statement. Is the statement exaggerating the risks or downplaying positive outcomes? For instance, stating "If this policy goes into effect, chaos will ensue" suggests a fear-driven narrative.
    - Ensure that the statement explicitly connects potential or fictitious outcomes with fear-inducing language.

3. **Exaggeration and Hyperbole**:
    - Identify any exaggeration in claims about risks or consequences. For example, claims that imply imminent doom or catastrophic scenarios without concrete evidence (e.g., "we will face disaster if we don’t act immediately") are likely Appeals to Fear.

4. **Generalization and Placeholders**:
    - Watch for generalizations that overstate a situation or condition, such as "All people will suffer if this continues," or vagueness paired with urgent calls for action (e.g., "We must act now to prevent disaster.").
    - Sentences that use generalized language about groups (e.g., "The enemy aims to destroy all of us") should be scrutinized.

5. **Call to Action Driven by Fear**:
    - If the statement attempts to provoke a specific action based on fear (like urging people to stockpile resources or avoid certain behaviors), classify it as an Appeal to Fear.
    - Examine if the phrasing implies a need for immediate action to prevent an exaggerated negative outcome (e.g., "You must protect yourself because it’s too dangerous outside.").

6. **Separation of Facts from Fear Induction**:
    - When statements include facts but are framed in a manner to induce fear, they should be classified accordingly. Example: "Due to the recent turmoil, many lives were lost; prepare for more casualties if this continues" uses factual context to create a fear appeal.

7. **Inversions of Hope**:
    - Statements that flip hope into fear, such as "If we don’t get help soon, the consequences will be dire," typically classify as Appeals to Fear, especially when they threaten loss or disaster.

8. **Avoid Over-Classification**:
    - Not every negative statement or expression of concern constitutes an Appeal to Fear. Statements that are straightforward reports (e.g., "There was an incident today") without emotional language or calls to action should not be classified as Appeals to Fear.
    - Comments that reflect personal feelings or subjective experiences (e.g., "I fear for my family") should be treated as personal expressions rather than objective Appeals to Fear unless they are used in a manipulative context.

### Examples

- **True Appeal to Fear**: "If we don't strengthen our defenses, we risk invasion and total destruction." (Emotional, urgent, exaggerated risk)
- **False Positive**: "Our city is under threat of flooding." (While concerning, this is factual reporting without fear induction.)
- **False Negative**: "The enemy never sleeps; they are plotting our downfall as we speak." (This should be classified as an Appeal to Fear due to its exaggeration and fear-inducing nature.)

### Conclusion
Utilizing these guidelines will help discern between legitimate Appeals to Fear and statements that are merely negative or factual. Aim to distinguish the emotional tone and intent behind the language used, which is crucial for accurate classification.

[User]
Брифінг Начальника військової адміністрації Кривого Рогу Олександра Вілкула за підсумками 16 01 23
-  Доброго вечора, шановні земляки. Коротко про підсумки понеділка, сьогодні текстом.
У Кривому Розі ситуація повністю контролюється Військовою адміністрацією. Забезпечено роботу всієї інфраструктури, комунальних підприємств, медичної сфери та соціальних установ. Місто посилено патрулюється зведеними нарядами поліції та Національної гвардії.
-  Триває робота та надання допомоги людям на місці удару ворожої ракети по приватному сектору 14 січня. Задіяні всі необхідні комунальні служби. На сьогодні всі житлові будинки підключені до газу та водопостачання. Також на 100% відновлено електропостачання, у тому числі вуличне. Прийнято 84 заяві від людей, чиї будинки та квартири постраждали від удару, на матеріальну допомогу з міського бюджету. Вона призначатиметься на підставі актів обстеження, сума залежатиме від завданих збитків у кожному конкретному випадку.
-  Також сьогодні працював "Мобільний офіс" нашого Центру "Віза", допомагали оформляти людям заявки через «Дію» на державну допомогу. Усього допомогли оформити заявки 50-ти сім'ям криворіжців. Також прийнято рішення, що офіс продовжить свою роботу і завтра з 9:00 до 15:00. Він працюватиме за адресою – Гімназія-ліцей №129, вул. Гімназична (колишня Пензенська), 39.
-  Також продовжуємо надавати допомогу будматеріалами з резервного фонду міста родинам, чиї будинки постраждали. Вже надано 400 листів шиферу, майже 2000 квадратних метрів плівки, більше ніж 250 квадратних метрів скла. При цьому організовані бригади по різанню скла, тобто воно видається людям одразу за потрібними їм розмірами. Надається допомога й іншими будматеріалами. Також комунальними службами організовано вивезення уламків та прибирання території.
-  Шановні земляки. За офіційною інформацією енергетиків, після терористичних атак окупантів в енергосистемі країни є великий дефіцит генерації. Тому Укренерго значно обмежила обсяги споживання у всій Україні. І тому зберігається висока ймовірність застосування енергетиками екстрених відключень електроенергії, які можуть тривати понад чотири години. Зберігайте вдома запаси води, тримайте зарядженими телефони, ліхтарики та пауербанки. Навіть у цих складних умовах, у місті вся важлива інфраструктура працює. Електротранспорт міста працює згідно з виділеними лімітами – 10 одиниць швидкісного трамваю, 11 міського трамваю та 60 тролейбусів. Також працює 21 комунальний автобус. Вуличне освітлення також працює згідно з виділеними лімітами – на 25%. Енергетики роблять все можливе для стабілізації ситуації, але вона складна. Скільки ще триватимуть аварійні відключення – спрогнозувати зараз неможливо. Але ми можемо допомогти енергетикам відповідально підходячи до споживання електроенергії, особливо в ранкові та вечірні години.
-  Щодо ситуації на нашому напрямку фронту, то вона залишається під повним контролем Збройних Сил України. Але, за інформацією Генштабу ЗСУ, ворог продовжує обстріли населених пунктів на правому березі Дніпра. Мінометних та артилерійських обстрілів, зокрема, зазнали Гаврилівка, Дудчани, Качкарівка, Зміївка, Берислав, Львове та Херсон. Окупанти продовжують терор мирних громад і Нікопольського району нашої області. Вночі окупанти здійснили обстріли з важкої артилерії Марганецької та Червоногригорівської громад. У Червоногригорівській громаді пошкоджено близько 10 житлових будинків, 2 автівки, ЛЕП, газогін, 6 господарських споруд, одна споруда знищена.  Слава Богу, без втрат. У Криворізькому районі обстрілів не було.
Зберігаємо спокій, витримку, віримо у наші Збройні Сили та нашу Перемогу!
Скучної вам ночі, дорогі земляки!
Слава Кривбасу та Слава Україні!