[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Институт прошлого публикует выгодное для россиян исследование в нужный для них момент. Когда по Украине летят ночами ракеты, Герасимов, как архитектор плана, должен опираться на результат, которого нет благодаря работе ПВО.
Но также целью российских атак является моральное давление на украинцев. Как же доказать, что это работает, если украинцы не паникуют и продолжают сопротивление?
Правильно - достаточно просто подождать, пока идиоты в самой Украине помогут им нужными цифрами.
Институт Будущего (он же прошлого) - это структура весьма странная и глупая.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Хохол-бумеранг...
https://peremogi.livejournal.com/71156417.html
#знаете ли вы шо

#аберрация сознания

#ублюдки и выродки просто сдохнут

#страна 404

#украинство - это

#концептуальная перемога

#придумать что-то другое

#испанский лыжный инструктор

#и тут снизу постучали...


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Перехопили розмову російського комбата 3 МСБ 60 ОМСБР, де він зізнається в розстрілі своїх підлеглих за відмову виконувати наказ.
З нашої сторони претензій немає. Мінус один росіянин, і слава Богу.
ПІДПИСУЙСЯ


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Російські окупанти використовують Каховську гідроелектростанцію, як військовий об’єкт.
«На даний момент станція не виробляє електроенергію»
,
— Генеральний директор "Укргідроенерго" Ігор Сирота.
За інформацією гендиректора станція наповнена вибухівкою та зброєю. Росіяни там організували опорний пункт, адже станція може витримати ледь не ядерний удар. Через росіяни вони почувають себе у безпеці.
На відновлення Каховської ГЕС підуть роки та мільярди гривень. Але більш точно можна буде сказати лише після деокупації.
надіслати новину
@hueviy_kherson_Bot
👉

ПІДПИСАТИСЯ


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
JOZEPH STALIN AND "BORSTH"
Фейк, являющийся предметом гордости у некоторой части политических украинцев - "
Как "украинские эммигранты" в 'украинском ресторане" в Вашингтоне

в
 день смерти И.В.Сталина - 5 марта 1953 года - бесплатно борщом угощали
" (Рисунок 1)
.
Почему это фейк? Обьясняю:
1. Согласно "The News-Herald" (Franklin, Pennsylvania) от 9 марта 1953 года на фотогафии изображена Элин Киннан, официантка ресторана "1203" (Рис.-2) и она -
ирландка
 (Рис.-3) с
"русским супом"
, коим борщ североамериканцами того времени и считался.
2. Согласно "Bizapedia", в которой сохранены записи о всех предприятиях, когда либо существоваших на территории США,  ресторан "1203" в Вашингтоне никакой этнической окраски не носил и был назван так в честь ... улицы -
1203
, на которой и распологался (Рис.-4).
P.S.  Хозяева ресторана были маркетолагами -ну так себе, фиговенькими (мягко сказано) и ресторан они прикрыли в 1955 году, согласно все той же Bizapedia.
Джозеф пришёл за кабаком. И быстро пришёл.
ІСТОРІЯ УКРАЇНИ


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Сегодня Верховна Рада вернула украинским военнослужащим доплаты в 30 тысяч гривен.
Вместе с тем, не все так радужно, как хотелось бы. По информации народного депутата Желязняка, надбавку защитникам будут выплачивать путем экономии на сокращении зарплат для госслужащих и менеджеров государственных предприятий (до 10 минимальных зарплат).
Депутат уверен, что этого ограничения даже на 2% от планируемых расходов не хватит и прогнозирует, что в бюджет придется вносить поправки.
"Поэтому я бы пока не столь однозначно утверждал, что вернули"
, - добавил он.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
ЯКЩО ПЕРЕКРУТИТИ ГАЙКИ, ВОНИ ЛОПАЮТЬСЯ.
Багато хто питає, чи правда, що військові дії відбуваються на рфії? Так, вони загралися та не втримали негативних настроїв. Тепер у прихильників “сво” є можливість у ній взяти участь, але вже у себе вдома.
Нагадую, що світова війна для імперії Романових так і завершилася. Солдати, які не захотіли гинути за незрозумілі для них цілі, влаштували переворот і повалили монархію. Пригожин, звісно ж, не Ленін, але режим приречений на провал.
Якщо олігархи, які не задоволені (втратили мільйони, через санкції-“сво”) оберуть сторону пригожина, то клан путіна точно впаде.
Проте не варто забувати, що ситуативно пригожин зараз вигідний для нас гравець, але він такий же ворог України, який прийшов на нашу землю вбивати наших людей.
Наша задача - спостерігати, аналізувати, робити свої висновки, та без емоцій продовжувати свою роботу по деокупації країни.
НЕМІЧЕВ
🇺🇦


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
⬆
⬆
⬆
Співпраця з суб’єктами фінансового моніторингу та громадськістю
У рамках співпраці з приватним сектором, Держфінмоніторингом продовжується тестування обміну інформацією з суб’єктами первинного фінансового моніторингу засобами Інформаційно-телекомунікаційної системи «Електронний кабінет системи фінансового моніторингу», яка впроваджується за підтримки проєкту Антикорупційна Ініціатива Європейського Союзу в Україні (EUACI).
Так, Держфінмоніторингом було поновлено тестування обміну інформацією з банківськими установами з використанням форматів повідомлень, визначених у постанові Національного банку України від 26.08.2022 № 193.
Також у вересні поточного року Службою було оновлено рекомендації щодо подання до Держфінмоніторингу банками та небанківськими установами інформації щодо проведення фінансових операцій. Ці рекомендації були оновлені після внесення змін до Базового Закону.
Водночас, у період воєнного стану Держфінмоніторинг акцентовано забезпечує співпрацю з громадськістю. Так, 29 березня та 01 вересня 2023 року відбулись відповідно четверте та п’яте засідання Громадської ради при Держфінмоніторингу.
Під час засідань представник Держфінмоніторингу поінформував присутніх про реалізацію Службою у 2022 та 2023 роках державної політики у сфері запобігання та протидії легалізації (відмиванню) доходів, одержаних злочинним шляхом, фінансуванню тероризму та фінансуванню розповсюдження зброї масового знищення, в умовах воєнного стану.
Також, членами Громадської ради було схвалено План роботи Громадської ради при Держфінмоніторингу на 2024 рік.
Крім того, на виконання частини другої статті 36 Закону України від 06.12.2019 р. № 361-ІХ «Про запобігання та протидію легалізації (відмиванню) доходів, одержаних злочинним шляхом, фінансуванню тероризму та фінансуванню розповсюдження зброї масового знищення» Держфінмоніторингом було направлено до Верховної Ради України звіт про стан запобігання та протидії легалізації (відмиванню) доходів, одержаних злочинним шляхом, фінансуванню тероризму та фінансуванню розповсюдження зброї масового знищення за 2022 рік (далі – Звіт).
У Звіті міститься інформація про результати діяльності учасників національної антилегалізаційної системи за 2022 рік, враховуючи умови збройної агресії РФ проти України.
Також, відповідно до статті 45 Закону України «Про державну службу» та Типового порядку проведення публічного звіту керівника органу виконавчої влади, затвердженого наказом Національного агентства з питань державної служби 20.12.2016 № 277 та зареєстрованого у Міністерстві юстиції України від 11.01.2017 за № 28/29896, із врахуванням запровадження воєнного стану в Україні та наслідків його введення, у квітні 2023 року Головою Державної служби фінансового моніторингу України представлено публічний звіт за 2022 рік.
У сфері методологічної роботи Держфінмоніторингу, з 27 по 28 квітня 2023 року було проведено міжнародну конференцію, організовану Держфінмоніторингом за підтримки проекту «Зміцнення готовності системи фінансового моніторингу протистояти відмиванню коштів та фінансуванню тероризму», в рамках Програми підтримки Організації з безпеки співробітництва в Європі (ОБСЄ) для України та у співпраці з Антикорупційною ініціативою ЄС в Україні (EUACI) на тему: «Наднаціональна та національна системи ПВК/ФТ/ФРЗМЗ: виклики та перспективи».
Вказаний захід було присвячено обговоренню особливостей імплементації антилегалізаційного законодавства з урахуванням результатів третього кола Національної оцінки ризиків у сфері запобігання та протидії легалізації (відмиванню) доходів, одержаних злочинним шляхом, фінансуванню тероризму та фінансуванню розповсюдження зброї масового знищення, сучасних викликів та визначенню стратегічних пріоритетів подальшої еволюції системи реагування на відповідні загрози, у тому числі в умовах військової агресії РФ проти України.
⬇
⬇
⬇


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
👌🏻
 Полонений орк оригінально відповів, чому рф не захопила Київ "за три дні"
"Тому що народ інший зустріли, ось і все. З духом, з любов'ю до Батьківщини".
Ну краще і не скажеш…
Шкода, що пуйлу це ніяк не дійде.

Надсилайте новини в анонімний бот
➡
@novosty_kiev_bot
➡

ПІДПИСАТИСЬ


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Голодный и холодный
Жена, отправлявшая своему пидору-оккупанту бабосы на пожрать/одеться недовольна работой департамента психологической поддержки.
🔥
Вольнов
 |
Пранки
 |
Предложка


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Використовуйте добірку інформаційних матеріалів для захисту від зловмисників
👇
:
🔹
"Комп’ютерні віруси та як від них захиститися: поради кіберполіції"
https://www.facebook.com/cyberpoliceua/posts/pfbid02BrVweBAqVYk1xY7Wrpqa81aoyVgJ4FT6E3np7kdxNufhh7EByVhiHxUP8Cw4TKFel
🔹
"Захист облікових записів: поради кіберполіції"
https://www.facebook.com/cyberpoliceua/videos/1786757075142769/
🔹
"Як діяти при втраті ґаджету – поради кіберполіції"
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1713728495816176


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Діяльність юросіб, які не виконують закон про деколонізацію топонімії, будуть припиняти за позовом Мінюсту
, - Кабмін


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
#США

#Гонка24

#Трамп

#Байдениада
⚡
🇺🇸
⚡
КОЛЕБЛЮЩИЕСЯ ШТАТЫ УХОДЯТ К ТРАМПУ
❗

Мы писали в субботу, что Трамп начинает уходить в отрыв по всем опросам
👉
 https://t.me/Ten_NaPleten/5249
.
И вот сегодня утром вышел НОВЫЙ опрос CNN в двух колеблющихся штатах. И новости там для президента Байдена ПРОСТО ГРУСТНЫЕ:
 Дональд Трамп лидирует как в Джорджии, так и в Мичигане.
В Джорджии, где на выборах-2020 Байден выиграл с минимальным преимуществом, сейчас избиратели предпочитают ему Трампа с перевесом в 5%. В Мичигане, где Трамп выиграл в 2016, а Байден в 2020, экс-президент сейчас лидирует с отрывом в 10%. По 10% избирателей в обоих штатах не хотят голосовать ни за того, ни за другого. Преимущество Трампа над Байденом значительно укрепилось за счет тех, кто вообще не ходил на выборы-2020. Среди них Трамп лидирует в Джорджии на 26%, а в Мичигане – на целых 40%.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Загальні бойові втрати противника з 24.02.22 по 18.02.24 орієнтовно склали / The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.02.24 were approximately:
особового складу / personnel ‒ близько/ about 402430(+1080) осіб / persons,
танків / tanks ‒ 6487 (+11) од,
бойових броньованих машин / APV ‒ 12198 (+53) од,
артилерійських систем / artillery systems – 9709 (+40) од,
РСЗВ / MLRS – 984 (+0) од,
засоби ППО / Anti-aircraft warfare systems ‒ 674 (+3) од,
літаків / aircraft – 335 (+3) од,
гелікоптерів / helicopters – 325 (+0) од,
БПЛА оперативно-тактичного рівня / UAV operational-tactical level – 7449 (+36),
крилаті ракети / cruise missiles ‒ 1898 (+2),
кораблі /катери / warships / boats ‒ 25 (+0) од,
підводні човни / submarines - 1 (+0) од,
автомобільної техніки та автоцистерн/ vehicles and fuel tanks – 12736 (+2) од,
спеціальна техніка / special equipment ‒ 1540 (+7)
Дані уточнюються / Data are being updated.
Бий окупанта! Разом переможемо! Наша сила - в правді!/ Strike the occupier! Let's win together! Our strength is in the truth!


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
⚡
 Уряд максимально спростив процедури експортного контролю в сфері виробництва безпілотників
Спрощення діятиме для виробників боєприпасів та бойових частин до безпілотних систем, включених до реєстру виконавців державних контрактів.
Що змінилося:
🔘
 щоб отримати разовий дозвіл на імпорт товарів військового призначення та подвійного використання, виробник має подати до Держекспортконтролю лише заяву та відповідний сертифікат в електронному форматі. Решту документів він надаватиме згодом – разом зі звітом про використання дозволу;
🔘
 щоб пройти експертизу Держекспортконтролю, буде потрібно надіслати лише заяву.
Заступник Міністра економіки Ігор Фоменко пояснив, що це суттєво прискорить процедури, сприятиме зростанню виробництва, а відповідно, посиленню обороноспроможності України.
Детальніше про зміни:
https://cutt.ly/rwmvuMW8


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🗣
У мене починаються обшуки після таких питань
, — Кличко та його відповідь на запитання чи планує він балотуватися у президенти.
"Ось ти починаєш ставити такі питання... А потім Володимир Олександрович Зеленський починає нервувати", - заявив мер
Києва
.

Надсилайте новини в анонімний бот
➡
@novosty_kiev_bot
➡

ПІДПИСАТИСЬ


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
⚡
❗
❗
Леонид Пасечник избран Главой Луганской Народной Республики.
Его кандидатуру путем тайного голосования поддержали 49   депутатов Парламента Республики


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
В отношении Молдовы звучат тревожные новости – там открыто заявляют об угрозе нападения со стороны России, а президент Майя Санду запросила больше полномочий для спецслужб.
Это происходит на фоне
продолжающихся акций протеста оппозиции
, которые власти считают инспирированными из Москвы. Так,
19 февраля в Кишиневе прошел очередной антиправительственный митинг оппозиции
. Его организовала
партия "Шор"
, лидеров которой связывают с РФ.
Требования – отставка Санду, перевыборы, снижение тарифов. И причины для недовольства действительно есть:
 за последний год
инфляция выросла более чем на треть
, тарифы сильно увеличились, дорожают продукты и лекарства. А из-за ударов по энергосистеме Украины
Молдова еще и потеряла 30% электроэнергии
, которую покупала у Киева. По соцопросам,
около 60% молдаван недовольны ситуацией в республике
.
Остается также открытым
вопрос Приднестровья –
 региона, который не подчиняется Кишиневу и фактически контролируется Россией.
Со своей армией и спецслужбами.
Все это делает ситуацию в стране достаточно взрывоопасной.
По словам самой Санду,
на Молдову готовится нападение
, а всех протестующих она называет “внешним элементом”.
"
Нападения на Молдову готовятся.
 Планы на ближайший период предполагают действия с привлечением диверсантов с военной подготовкой,
которые будут атаковать некоторые государственные здания, захватив заложников
. Так называемая оппозиция хочет сменить власть в Кишинёве. Поэтому парламент Молдовы должен как можно скорее принять законопроекты, которые обеспечат СИБ (службу безопасности и информации) и прокуратуру
инструментами для более эффективной борьбы с рисками для безопасности страны
. Все те, кто участвует в этих акциях, направленных против Молдовы, – внешние элементы, члены политических партий и преступных группировок, а также все те, кто их защищает, должны быть привлечены к ответственности", – заявила Санду.
Также ситуацию в Молдове комментируют и в Украине –
 накануне Владимир Зеленский заявил, что передал Санду
некий "российский документ" с планом по "разрушению политической ситуации в Молдове"
. Цель плана, по словам Зеленского – "
сломать Молдову
, демократический порядок этой страны и установить свой контроль над ней". А секретарь СНБО Данилов заявил, что
на территории Молдовы вскоре могут оказаться чеченцы, воевавшие с 24 февраля в Украине
.
На эту же тему идут заявления и от американцев.
"Мы глубоко обеспокоены некоторыми заговорами, которые, как мы видели, исходили из России, чтобы попытаться
дестабилизировать правительство
", – сказал госсекретарь США Блинкен на встрече с Санду в кулуарах Мюнхенской конференции по безопасности.
Россия официально отрицает любые планы по вмешательство во внутренние дела Молдовы.
 Однако, определенные намеки из Москвы идут. В начале февраля глава МИД РФ Сергей Лавров заявил, что
Запад готовит Молдову на роль "новой Украины”
, где “специфическими методами, далеко не свободно-демократическими, поставили во главе страны президента, которая просто сама рвется в НАТО.
Она имеет румынское гражданство, она готова объединяться с Румынией и вообще готова практически на все
. Молдова – это одна из стран, которые Запад хочет превратить в очередную анти-Россию", – сказал Лавров.
Все это напоминает развитие событий в Украине год назад.
 Только тогда Украину предупреждали о
полномасштабной войне
, а руководство РФ рассыпалось в обвинениях в адрес киевских властей. На фоне неудач в Украине президенту России Путину
очень нужна “маленькая победоносная война”
, и Молдова кажется действительно легкой целью. Однако очевидно, что силам контингента в Приднестровье ее не провести, а путь к Приднестровью российским войскам перекрывают ВСУ.