[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Вчора та сьогодні Z-канали активно публікують списки льотчиків, які були знищені в ході походу "вагнерівців" на Москву.
Цікаво, що серед знищених є заступник командира
610 Центру бойового застосування та переучування льотного складу
.
В середині червня ми
публікували дослідження
 електронної пошти (на основі зламу листувань) російського воєнного злочинця, екс-командира
610 Центру
... (в/ч 41520) полковника Леоніда Русіна.
Завжди приємно бачити, що у частин зс рф, які досліджуєш, невдовзі з'являються втрати.
Іраклій Комахідзе в таких випадках каже, що росіян "
наздогнала карма полум'я InformNapalm
".
🔥

Підтримати IN
 |
Сторінки
|
@informnapalm


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Великобритания рассматривает возможность поставки Украине танков Challenger 2, пишет Sky News
Ну, ̶с̶т̶а̶д̶и̶о̶н̶ ̶т̶а̶к̶ ̶с̶т̶а̶д̶и̶о̶н̶ зачеркнуто Челленджер так Челленджер.
Мне вообще пофиг, какой это будет танк. Абрамс, Челленджер, Меркава, Леопард или Булат.
Лишь бы ̶у̶л̶и̶ц̶а̶ ̶б̶ы̶л̶а̶ ̶з̶а̶а̶с̶ф̶а̶л̶ь̶т̶и̶р̶о̶в̶а̶н̶а̶ ̶и̶ ̶о̶с̶в̶е̶щ̶е̶н̶а̶ обратно зачеркнуто лишь бы на нем был тризуб.
За крест на танке розовое левачье меня опять забанит нахрен


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Під виглядом переселенки збирала дані про ЗСУ

🤬
🔻
Співробітники Служби безпеки України (СБУ) виявили зрадницю, як займалась збором даних про дислокацію військових та їх переміщення у Львові на користь противника. Ворожа інформаторка приїхала до обласного центру з Миколаївщини та займалась злочинною дільність прикидаючись ВПО.
🔻
Як інформує прес-центр відомства,

жінка розпочала свою співпрацю з росіянам торік восени. Як виявилось, її брат також виявився зрадником , якого також не так давно затримали правоохоронці.
🔻
У СБУ встановили, що ворожа інформаторка часто бувала поблизу місць, де розташовуються військові формувань та робила позначки на електронних картах.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Високоповажне панство!!! Раджу переглянути розмову з професором Юрієм Городніченком. Він - найкращий молодий економіст світу, один із 10 найцитованіших вчених світу за останні 10 років, професор Каліфорнійського університету в Берклі, і до того ж  – випускник Києво-Могилянки.
У квітні 2022 року керував підготовкою доповіді "План реконструкції України", а також входив у групу радників уряду США з питань санкційної політики.
Крім повоєнної відбудови України та економічного переслідування  Росії говорили також про Китай та його європейські інтереси.
Запрошую на YouTube-канал
«Орестократія». Він зовсім інший, ніж ТГ-канал, але не менш цікавий.
До речі, там уже 52 тисячі підписників. Більше, ніж тут


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Диван с деньгами
В сети появилось видео августовских обысков у фигуранта расследования о мошенничестве на закупках в Минобороны экс-замминистра обороны Александра Миронюка, в диване которого нашли почти миллион долларов.
Сразу после обысков Миронюк предоставил суду документ, что деньги с дивана были якобы не его, а 86-летней пенсионерки из Харькова. И в декабре прошлого года суд вернул ему изъятые почти $1 млн.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Пока большинство стран мира призывают прекратить бойню в Секторе Газа, США продолжает поставлять режиму Нетаньяху авиабомбы для, по сути, ковровых бомбардировок.
Так выглядит война если у обороняющейся стороны нет ПВО.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Взяв участь у Всеукраїнському Молодіжному форумі «Пазли Перемоги», який сьогодні приймає Львів. Дякую управлінню молоді та спорту Львівської ОВА за те, що зібрало в одній локації близько 150 освічених, сміливих людей з різних куточків нашої держави з активною громадянською позицією і чітким баченням майбутнього України – студентів, громадських активістів, представників молодіжних рад.
Мені прикро, що ваша молодість припала на час таких важких випробувань для нашої держави. Але я точно знаю, що ви є і будете поколінням українців із нульовою толерантністю до приниження, брехні та корупції.
Щоб у Львівській області було більше місць, де молодь зможе якісно проводити час, єднатися та інтегруватися у державні процеси, розширюємо мережу молодіжних рад, молодіжних центрів, сучасних бібліотечних просторів, тирів і кабінетів патріотичного виховання у школах.
Залишайтесь молодими завжди. Це не про вік. Це про мислення і вчинки.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
пока все пуски что есть собаками Ту-22М3 были по Полтавской/Харьковской областям
взлетели собаки с Шайковки


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🇨🇦
🤝
⚛

Канадські Capital Power Corp. та Ontario Power Generation об'єднають зусилля для оцінки доцільності розробки
ММР
Обидві компанії заявили, що малі модульні реактори (ММР) будуть критично важливими найближчими роками, якщо Альберта – одна з провінцій Канади – хоче задовольнити дедалі більший попит на екологічно чисту електроенергію.
Підготовка техніко-економічного обґрунтування займе два роки і включатиме вивчення структур власності й експлуатації для потенційного парку мережевих ММР в Альберті.
Компанія Ontario Power Generation вже будує перший парк ММР із чотирьох блоків, потужністю по 300 МВТ кожен, на майданчику АЕС Darlington в Онтаріо. Очікується, що перший із них завершать зводити до 2028 року і вже до кінця 2029-го введуть в експлуатацію.
Нагадаємо,
 Енергоатом співпрацює із провідними розробниками малих модульних реакторів. Компанія підписала низку меморандумів щодо можливості впровадження в Україні ММР за технологіями всесвітньо відомих компаній Westinghouse, ARC Clean Energy та Holtec.
bnnbloomberg.ca/capital-power-and-opg-to-assess-use-of-small-modular-nuclear-reactors-in-alberta-1.2022075
#
атомні_новини

Написати нам
🇺🇦
 |
FB
 |
IG
 |
YT
 |
TW
 |
IN
 |
TH
 |
EA


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
💔
19 липня на 75-му році життя відійшов у вічність громадський діяч, член Української Гельсінської групи, політв'язень радянських таборів, філософ, публіцист, історик дисидентського руху Василь Овсієнко.
Василь Овсієнко народився 8 квітня 1949 року в селі Ставки на Житомирщині. Здобув філологічну освіту у Київському університеті. У другій половині 1960-х – на початку 1970-х поширював самвидав. А в 1972 році після масових арештів української інтелігенції узявся за видавництво шостого номера «Українського вісника».
Самого Василя Овсієнка радянська влада вперше арештувала в 1973-му, звинувативши в антирадянській агітації та пропаганді. Він тоді працював вчителем української мови й літератури на Київщині. Перший вирок – 4 роки позбавлення волі у таборах суворого режиму.
Загалом Василь Овсієнко провів в увʼязненні 13,5 років – за причетність до дисидентського руху та Української Гельсінської групи, відстоювання прав політвʼязнів і просто відстоювання справедливості. У таборах він познайомився з багатьма учасниками руху опору радянській владі. Півтора місяця сидів в одній камері з Василем Стусом. Потім був одним з організаторів перепоховання Василя Стуса, Юрія Литвина та Олекси Тихого в Україні.
Сам пан Василь про своє життя в радянський час говорив так:
«Я іронічно ставлюся до тих, хто каже, що я в неволі «боровся». Я не боровся. Я стояв, як паля, в брудному потоці, дбаючи, щоб не похилитися. Звичайно, це також треба оцінювати, але не як героїзм, а як нормальну людську поведінку за тих умов, що величезна більшість людей тоді поводилася ненормально. Люди покірно, як плохі вівці, брели туди, куди їх гнали. А я стояв на своєму».
Своє життя після повернення з радянських таборів та вже у незалежній Україні Василь Овсієнко присвятив відновленню справедливості, збереженню та поширенню історії дисидентського руху.
Був членом Всеукраїнської координаційної ради Української Гельсінської групи та очолював її Житомирську філію. З червня 1998 року став координатором програми Харківської правозахисної групи.
Пан Василь записав півтори сотні інтерв'ю з колишніми політв'язнями та склав біографічні довідки про них. Зібрані ним відомості лягли в основу електронного архіву справ політв'язнів Харківської правозахисної групи. Як координатор програми Харківської правозахисної групи він долучився до створення «Міжнародного біографічного словника дисидентів країн Центральної та Східної Європи й колишнього СРСР». Написав книгу спогадів про відомих дисидентів «Світло людей», видав чотиритомник матеріалів про Українську Гельсінську групу. У 2019 році у видавництві «Кліо» вийшла книга спогадів про самого Василя Овсієнка «Життя як покута».
«Влада любить мертвих, які мовчать. Я стараюся не давати їм мовчати. Це моя цеглина у фундамент України»
, – казав Василь Овсієнко.
Він також організовував експедиції на Соловецькі острови та в урочище Сандармох. Йому разом з однодумцями вдалося вивезти деякі речі з табору у Кучино у Пермському краї Росії, зокрема ключі, що можуть бути ключами від карцеру, в якому помер Василь Стус. На свої публічні виступи Василь Овсієнко приходив із цими ключами та своєю тюремною формою.
Він є лауреатом премії імені Василя Стуса за публіцистику, премії Огієнка в номінації «Громадська діяльність», нагороджений орденом «За заслуги» III ступеня, орденом «За мужність» I ступеня, орденом князя Ярослава Мудрого V ступеня.
Український інститут національної памʼяті мав честь працювати з Василем Овсієнком. Зокрема, він був одним з авторів виставки «Вʼязні сумління» про  історію українського правозахисного руху 1970-80-х років. Електронний варіант цієї виставки є у відкритому доступі
на сайті
 УІНП.
😞
В останні роки пан Василь тяжко хворів.
Висловлюємо щирі співчуття рідним і близьким! Це ще одна велика втрата для українського суспільства. Шана і памʼять панові Василеві, який зробив неоціненний внесок у памʼять нашого народу про своє минуле!
🖤
🇺🇦


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
"Що стосується держави-терориста, єдине, що має їх нині хвилювати, – як підготувати російське суспільство до того, що вони втрачатимуть усе те, заради чого знищують майбутнє своєї держави. Захоплені території росія втрачатиме. Нашим крокам із деокупації немає та не буде альтернативи.
Наші військові рухаються: позиція за позицією, крок за кроком ідемо вперед".
🇺🇦
Президент України Володимир Зеленський
Відео звернення
👉
https://fb.watch/lfI4L5R3fq/


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
❗
Сили Оборони згортають деякі операції через брак снарядів і скорочення допомоги Заходу, — командувач оперативно-стратегічного угрупування військ «Таврія» Тарнавський.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
✍

Зеленський
 підписав
 указ про звільнення усіх обласних військкомів.
Пояснюємо
, що означає «звільнення» на практиці та кого призначать на їхні місця
🔸
hromadske |
підписатися


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
"Forbes" нашёл ещё одну причину провала контрнаступа.
ВСУ не хватает
мостоукладчиков
.
Так, во время боёв на юге страны русские отошли за ручей, а всушники не смогли его преодолеть, и контрнаступ захлебнулся.
В общем нужны мостоукладчики, деревьявырыватели,
кустосрезатели
 и морезарыватели. И тогда на Москву.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User] Президент України Володимир Зеленський провів зустріч зі спікером Саейму Латвійської Республіки Едвардсом Смілтенсом.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
ТОП NEWS
🔹
 Ще один тиждень невтомної боротьби залишається позаду. ДБР продовжує протидіяти злочинам, що послаблюють нашу економіку та обороноздатність.
🔹
 Сьогодні у «ТОП NEWS» ви дізнаєтеся:
1⃣
 Недоброчесний військком.
Скільки майна очільника одного з Рівненських ТЦК передали в АРМА?
2⃣
 300 «ухилянтів».
Як працювала протиправна схема ухилення від мобілізації на Запоріжжі?
3⃣
 Махінації з виплатами для військових.
Скільки грошей вимивається з бюджету через нечистих на руку посадовців?
👉
 Детальніше у
відео: https://youtu.be/xb-lvISFlnw
✅
 ДБР у соцмережах:
Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Непроходимый, серый и смешной. Даже далёкие от проблем ЯО люди понимают разницу между: стоять на пороге создания ЯО, иметь какое-то ЯО, и обладать ЯО по настоящему. В первой группе масса стран, входит и выходит. Обладает ЯО только Россия, США, Китай. Все остальные - статисты. А уж ЮАР отказался совсем не потому, что пишет Пряник. Это игрушка требует совсем иной концентрации нации и государства. Из все кто на пороге такое есть только у КНДР и Израиля. Стандартных военных диктатур.
https://t.me/tolk_tolk/14915


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Начало

🔼
🔼
🔼
Однажды у меня произошла очень интересная встреча. Я шла в сторону ЦВК по бульвару Леси Украинки и на тротуаре столкнулась с выходившим из элитного ресторана очень дорого (настолько, что это уже было незаметно) одетым мужчиной. Он глянул на шарфик и чуть иронически спросил (по -украински): «Вам за это ничего не было?» Я коротко описала, как и что было. Услышав красивую литературную украинскую речь, он понял, что я не митингующая из Донецка, а коренная киевлянка и человек, понимающий, что происходит. И тут он выдал!
Я услышала, что он только что из Лондона, а оказалось, что все его друзья – на майдане. Он пытался им объяснить, что им рано или поздно будет стыдно, но, увы, бесполезно. И начал мне рассказывать как человек бывший в гуще событий там, "за бугром", что «оранжевую революцию» еще за два года до ее начала стали готовить сыновья Бжезинского, на ее реализацию было направлено три из четырех основных подразделенный США по психологической войне. Что он только что из Лондона и сам, будучи в офисе Березовского, слышал, как тот кричал в трубку Жвании: «Уберите со сцены эту кокаинистку, она нам все планы поломает!» Это было как раз тогда, когда Юлька призвала штурмовать гос. здания. Если кто помнит, ее несколько дней на сцене не было видно. Таким образом, о финансировании (помимо США) со стороны Березовского я узнала более чем за год до ставшего публичным скандала, из уличного разговора.
Очевидцем истории я оказалась еще раз. Однажды дочка попросила, чтобы я повела ее в «этот зверинец». Мы собрались и поехали гулять. Вышли возле Мариинского парка перед Верховной Радой. Одеты были так: на мне – бело-голубой шарфик, ребенок – обмотан бело-голубым флагом, а ее дружок-ровесник из параллельного класса – с бело-голубой банданой на лице. И тут подходя к подъезду ВР мы нос к носу сталкиваемся с вылезающим из черного джипа американским послом Хербстом! Мы так (на расстоянии метров 4-5) смотрим друг другу в глаза, у него – отвисшая челюсть (как же! Народ, да не тот!), я вдруг на автомате выкрикиваю «Янки гоу хом!», Тот приходит в себя, его уводит лысый Осташ (других я не опознала в темноте). А на следующий день вдруг Верховная рада принимает то самое ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЕ решение о «фальсификациях во время второго тура», которое и стало БАЗИСОМ для решения Верховного Суда о «Третьем туре».
Можно было бы рассказывать долго: и о, видимо, помешавшемся водителе экскурсионного автобуса, которому от бело-голубого шарфика снесло крышу и он гонялся за мной по тротуару на Институтской, и о других вещах. Но, думаю, общую атмосферу в Киеве за пределами досягаемости телекамер 5 канала, мне в какой-то мере, удалось передать.