[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
До зведеного бюджету протягом січня – жовтня 2023 року надійшло 976,8 млрд гривень

🔵
🟢
📊
 За оперативними даними надходження (сальдо) до зведеного бюджету у січні – жовтні 2023 року по платежах, що контролюються ДПС, становлять 976,8 млрд грн. До державного бюджету надійшло 605,6 млрд грн, до місцевих бюджетів – 371,2 млрд гривень.
Надходження (сальдо) до загального фонду державного бюджету у січні – жовтні 2023 року становили 595,1 млрд грн. Показники розпису Міністерства фінансів України за доходами загального фонду державного бюджету виконано на 102,5 відс., додатково до бюджету надійшло 14,8 млрд грн. При цьому на рахунки платників відшкодовано 111,6 млрд грн ПДВ.
Детальніше читайте тут
👉

https://t1p.de/mk43q
#ДПСінформує


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Ми втримали оборону.
Ми успішно наступали.
Росіяни з вересня по грудень утратили близько 48 тисяч лише загиблими.
Плюс вдвічі/втричі більше пораненими.
Українці перемололи щонайменше 140 тисяч окупантів за 3 місяці.
За перші 15 днів січня 9 тисяч лише убитими у росіян.
Тепер в нашу перемогу вірить та інвестує увесь світ.
Чим нас здивує «Рамштайн» завтра?
Побачимо.
А вже зараз ЗСУ передадуть / почали передавати:
🇬🇧
14 танків Challenger 2
🇬🇧
30 САУ AS90
 (подібні в управлінні до «Крабів»)
🇬🇧
200 БМП/БТР
🇨🇦
200
бронемашин Senator
🇨🇦
1 батарея ПВО NASAMS
🇵🇱
14 танків Леопард 2
🇺🇸
100
БМП Bradley
🇺🇸
55 бронемашин
🇺🇸
100 БТР M113
🇺🇸
18
САУ M109А6
🇺🇸
250 БТР M1117
🇺🇸
138 бронемашин HMMWV
🇺🇸
100 Stryker БТР
🇺🇸
GLSDB
🇺🇸
36 105-мм гаубиць
🇺🇸
1 батарея ПВО/О Patriot
🇺🇸
6
батарей ПВО Nasams
🇺🇸
18
HIMARS
🇫🇷
 40
колісних танків AMX-10RC
🇫🇷
 (?) бронеавтомобілів Bastion
🇩🇪
40
Marder БМП
🇩🇪
1 батарея ПВО/О Patriot
🇩🇪
3 батареї ПВО Iris-T + 3 РЛС TRML-4D
🇩🇪
2 РЛС TRML-4D
🇩🇪
🇳🇴
🇩🇰
16 Zuzana-2 САУ
🇳🇱
🇺🇸
🇨🇿
120 T-72 танк
🇳🇱
1 батарея ПВО/О Patriot
🇸🇪
50 CV-90 БМП
🇸🇪
12
Archer САУ
🇮🇹
🇫🇷
1 батарея ПВО/О SAMP/T
🇨🇿
26-
30 САУ Dana-M2
🇪🇪
10+ гаубиць 155mm FH70
🇪🇪
10+ гаубиць 122mm Д30
🇩🇰
 19
САУ Caesar
💥
 МИ
🇷🇺
 ТРАХНЕМ!
💥


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Час від часу рашка дістає лукашенка, який лякає світ обіцянками «одкб нє будєт отсіживаться».
Хотілось би, щоб країни Балтії напали на Білорусь та припинили вже ці дебільні погрози. Але якщо доведеться тільки нам віддуватись, то впевнений, що українська армія справиться. А для диктаторських режимів учасниць одкб такий крок стане самогубством, і поневолені нації отримають шанс повернути собі свободу. Можливо, з нашою допомогою
😎
@MaksymZhorin

👊🏻


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
ЧТО ТАКОЕ "ЭКЗОЭТНОНИМ" (ЭКЗОНИМ) И "ЭНДОЭТНОНИМ" (САМОНАЗВАНИЕ)?
В ряде бесед столкнулся с непонимание терминов "Экзоэтноним" и "Самоназвание". Причем грешат этим многие со всех сторон диалога.
А вот давайте разберем понятийную сторону с использованием конкретного примера.
Итак:
1. Экзоэтноним
 - он же
Экзоним (от греч. ἔξω экзо «вне» и греч. ὄνομα онома «имя»)
—
слова, не употребляющиеся местным населением или народом (аборигенами), в том числе и на официальном уровне, однако используемые по отношению к ним внешними сообществами.
2. Самоназвание
, или
Эндоэтноним
 (
от др.-греч. έ‌νδον «внутри, дома» + έ‌θνος «народ, племя» + ὄνυμα «имя»
) —
имя народа, которое он присваивает себе сам. Зачастую самоназвания кардинально отличаются от того, как этническая группа определяется в научной литературе или в окружающем обществе.
Другими словами ..... пример -
Московия, московиты
  - э
кзоэтнонимы или экзонимы
, использовавшиеся в ряде европейских государств практически до конца 17-го и середины 18-го века, с целью обозначения России и Русских. Одновременно сами русские никогда не использовали данные термины-экзонимы во внутреннем обиходе, внутреннем деловом документообороте и внешних сношениях, посльку преимущественно пользовались (и Слава Богу пользуются до сих пор) собственными  э
ндоэтнонимами
 -
самоназваниями
  - т.е. свою страну они называли -
Русь
, а позднее
Россия
, а себя -
Русскими
.
Однако, данные действия вносили некую путаницу в умы части европейских  политиков, картографов и путешественников. Яркий пример такого диссонанса я продемонстрировал вам, когда описал казус, произошедший с картографом Корнелиусом Витклифом в его работе
"Descriptionis Ptolemaicae Augmentum"
, когда он на одну карту сумел нанести, как название одной страны в
экзонимическом определении

"Московия"
 , так и согласно
самоназвания
 -
Россия
 [
Ситуация описана десь
].
Почему такое происходило? Применительно к ситуации с Витклифом это обьясняется просто. Сам Корнелиус Витклиф был "кабинетным" картографом и не осуществлял изыскательских, военных и коммерческих экспедиций на трериторию материков и стран, которые описывал. В своей работе он опирался на данные, которые уже существовали задолго до него (с 13-го века), так и использовал те материалы и информацию, которые он получал уже самостоятельно от лиц, которые осуществляли туда новые путешествия.
И, если, давно устоявшимся в Европе именем для Руси, (Русского Царства, России) был термин - экзоним "
Московия
" (присвоенный инострацами намного ранее, собственно, по названию княжества - Московского, которое только впоследствии смогло начать активно собирать вокруг себя все прочие земли, населенные русским населением и обьединять их в общую государственную формацию), то к концу 16 века, когда Голландия, Англия и Швеция в разы увеличили торговое и военное сотрудничество с восточным соседом (а сам восточный сосед уже сформировался в полноценное государственное образование - Русское Царство, Россия), то, соответственно выросло и количество людей (негоциантов, военных и пр.), которые там бывали (и стали использовать для обозначения этой страны
эндотноним
, общепринятый как у местного населения, так и в сфере внутреннего делового общения
 вместо экзонима
),  тогда в обиход европейских жителей и стали входить
термины-эндотнонимы
 "Россия" и "Русские", которые являлись
самоназваниями
 Русского Царства (России) и народа соответсвенно (кстати использовались они местными со времен Ивана III (приблизительно)).
И вот тут-то господин Витклиф и попал на "биполярочку", влепив на карту, как
экзоним
,  про который он знал из более ранних материалов прочих картографов (и убрать его видимо "рука дрогнула"), но также (на всякий) решил нанести и самоназвание (эндотопоним) России (также уже активно используемый в Европе), вероятно подумав, что так он точно "за умного сойдет".Житейская ситуация? Так-то оно так конечно,
а вот итог - довольно чудаковатая карта.

Но это довольно стандартная ситуация и экзонимы еще долго из карты в карту перетаскивались, на радость сегодняшним "московитолагам".
Ваш Ру
Продолжение следует


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Бригада “Спартан” запалює!
🔥
Артилеристи 3 бригади оперативного призначення “Спартан” Національної гвардії України показали свої заняття на одному з полігонів.
РСЗВ та гаубиці — майстерність, а з нею й вогнева міць артилерії бригади “Спартан”, зростає щодня. Паралельно гвардійці вдосконалюють систему управління вогнем за допомогою дронів.
Підготовлені розрахунки 3 бригади оперативного призначення постійно працюють на передовій.
Штурмова бригада “Спартан” — об нас ламається ворог! Вступай і наступай!
📲

storm.mvs.gov.ua


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
В Республике продолжают работать мобильные офисы Министерства труда и социальной политики ДНР (УТСЗН) для социального обслуживания граждан, проживающих в отдаленных районах Донецкой Народной Республики. График выездов в марте смотрите в карточках.
@AG_DPR


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Справи Майдану: Результати роботи Офісу Генпрокурора у 2023 році
🔷
У День гідності та свободи, присвячений доленосним для сучасної України подіям, Офіс Генерального прокурора звітує про роботу щодо розслідування злочинів, вчинених у зв’язку із масовими протестами у 2013-2014 роках під час Революції Гідності.
🔹
Для слідчих і прокурорів розслідування справ Майдану залишається у фокусі особливої уваги та не припиняється навіть в умовах повномасштабного вторгнення. Протягом 2023 року за активної роботи профільного Департаменту Офісу Генпрокурора:
✅
51 особі повідомлено про підозру (майже вдвічі більше, ніж минулого року), з яких на час вчинення інкримінованих їм злочинів: 5 високопосадовців та керівників правоохоронних органів, 20 правоохоронців, 5 слідчих, 2 суддів, 4 цивільні особи.
✅
Встановлено безпосередній вплив спецслужб
 рф на колишнє керівництво української спецслужби. Повідомлено про підозру 20 співробітникам ФСБ рф. Серед підозрюваних 6 генералів, зокрема генерал армії. Також повідомлено про підозру колишньому Голові СБУ, його першому заступнику та начальнику Департаменту захисту національної державності СБУ.
✅
22 обвинувальних акти стосовно 45 осіб скеровано до суду, зокрема
стосовно колишнього Міністра внутрішніх справ України,
 його заступників, а також інших високопосадовців, суддів та правоохоронців.
✅
Скеровано до суду обвинувальний акт
 у ключовій справі щодо колишнього керівництва держави – Президента України, Міністра внутрішніх справ, Голови СБУ, Міністра оборони та ще 6 колишніх високопосадовців.
✅
Ухвалено 9 обвинувальних вироків стосовно 14 осіб. Зокрема щодо
безпосередніх виконавців
 масових розстрілів – співробітників роти спеціального призначення ПМОП «Беркут». Вперше у таких справах одного з них засуджено до довічного позбавлення волі.
🔹
Наразі прокурори профільного Департаменту забезпечують підтримання публічного обвинувачення у 139 судових справах стосовно 283 осіб.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Сьогодні росіяни спрямували ударний дрон на авто старости одного із сіл Новгород-Сіверської громади.
Транспортний засіб згорів. На щастя, люди не постраждали.
Цього дня староста з колегами допомагав у відновленні електромережі, яку раніше пошкодили обстріли.
❗
росія терорист. Терористів треба знищувати.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
«Telegram є і завжди був безпечним для українців», —
представник компанії Ремі Вонг.
У своєму
листі-відповіді на заяву ГУР,
 Ремі зазначив, що месенджер був створений спеціально для захисту користувачів від російського стеження. Його засновника вислали з рф ще до виходу Telegram за захист даних українців.
Times of Ukraine


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Спікер Палати представників Кевін Маккарті (республіканець) заявив, що США будуть і далі продовжувати підтримувати Україну.
Дуже красномовна відповідь на питання «журналіста» російського пропагандистського ЗМІ, на яке він відповів так:
«Я не підтримую те, що ваша країна зробила Україні. Я також не підтримую ваше вбивство дітей. Ви повинні піти».
Я особисто зустрічався з Маккарті, коли був у США. Це людина, яка вболіває за нашу перемогу і буде стояти за підтримку і передачу нам зброї.
Сьогодні Україна є обличчям боротьби всього вільного світу з диктатурою. Бо в першу чергу, ми стоїмо за демократичні цінності. І це треба памʼятати.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🤔
 Дані про рух грошей на картках таки будуть збирати, хоча Нацбанк сьогодні вранці спростував цю інформацію
Член Ради НБУ Василь Фурман пояснив, чи буде Національний банк України збирати дані про всі платежі фізичних осіб та навіщо це потрібно.
За його словами,
інформація буде надаватися узагальнена.
 Тобто, банки звітуватимуть не про конкретну особу, скільки і куди вона переказала коштів, а в загальному, про загальну кількість операцій з переказами.
👉

Рівне Головне
Стікери
 |
Надіслати новину


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
#Китай

#Расследование
⚡
🇨🇳
⚡
За ЧТО сняли с должности министра обороны КНР Ли Шанфу
❓

Наше РАССЛЕДОВАНИЕ - это ФАКТЫ, которые ложаться в логическую цепочку:
 1. В июле этого года Си Цзиньпин провёл учебу-совещание членов политбюро по вопросам военного управления
 в контексте соблюдения законности в армии и оборонной промышленности.
Главным экспертом и докладчиком выступил директор Института военного права Академии военных наук НОАК Чжао Дуньбин.
 2.
 ЧЕРЕЗ ДВА ДНЯ
на сайте военных закупок опубликовали
 уведомление о сборе свидетельств нарушений законности при проведении тендеров в период после октября 2017 года.
 3. Именно в конце сентября 2017 года Ли Шанфу вступил в должность начальника Управления по развитию вооружений.
 4. Из документа примерно ясно, в чём могут обвинить бывшего министра обороны:
 конфликт интересов, оказание помощи аффилированным компаниям в получении контрактов, предвзятость и предоставление преимуществ определённым интересам, участие в сговоре, формирование «закрытых кругов» для манипулирования процессом оценки контрактов, разглашение конфиденциальных данных.
 5. Теперь, когда Ли Шанфу освобождён от должности министра и члена Госсовета, понятно, что это первый шаг. Отсутствие публичного обоснования отставки не должно смущать:
 для подтверждения обвинений в коррупции нужен суд, ему предшествует уже завершившееся партийное расследование,
в случае с военнослужащим — военно-партийное. Как в решениях ПК ВСНП, так и в указах председателя КНР
 практически никогда не указываются причины отставки.
 6. Скорее всего, уже выявлены масштабные злоупотребления экономического характера и
 дисциплинарные выводы не ограничатся только бывшим министром, а коснуться большого количества генералов и офицеров китайской армии.
 7. Любое коррупционное дело —
 показательный пример, который власти КНР стараются максимально использовать.
Стоит дождаться решения Комиссии по проверке дисциплины при Центральном военном совете ЦК КПК, которая занимается расследованием деятельности Ли.
И ЕЩЁ ВЫДЕЛИМ ОСОБО
❗
Снятие Ли при таком перечне прегрешений носит сугубо внутренний характер и никак не связано с желанием наладить отношения с США, убрав подсанкционного министра. У кого есть ТАКИЕ мысли в голове, то можете их выбросить
❗


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
За добу війська РФ в Україні убили сімох і поранили 25 цивільних
Внаслідок падіння уламків збитих ракет в Києві троє людей загинули, 14 дістали поранення. Є загиблі і поранені на Донеччині, Харківщині й Херсонщині. За минулу добу, 31 травня, внаслідок російських обстрілів за добу загинули щонайменше семеро цивільних людей, ще 25 – дістали поранення. Такі підсумки аналізу ранкових зведень ОВА Внаслідок падіння уламків збитих ракет в Києві троє людей загинули, 14 дістали поранення. На Харківщині внаслідок обстрілу Вовчанська пошкоджено приватні житлові будинки, сталася пожежа на елеваторі, горіли 6 торговельних павільйонів на ринку і приміщення бібліотеки. Загинув цивільний чоловік 60 років, поранення зазнала жінка. На Донеччині за добу росіяни здійснили 24 обстріли: ОТРК “Іскандер”, авіаудари (тип ракет не встановлено), “КАБ – 250”, РСЗВ “Град”, артилерія, танк, міномет. Обстріляли 14 населених пунктів, серед яких Красногорівка, Авдіївка, Часів Яр, Торецьк, Костянтинівка, Слов’янськ. Пошкоджено 23 житлові будинки (з них 2 – багатоквартирних), будівля шахтоуправління “Покровське”, ферма, 3 цивільних автомобіля, гараж. В області за добу двоє загиблих і п’ятеро поранених серед цивільного населення. Пр Херсонщина за добу ворог здійснив 61 обстріл (309 снарядів), з них по Херсону 11 обстрілів (57 снарядів). Під час обстрілу селища Дніпровське Білозерської громади загинув 64-річний чоловік, у будинок якого влетів снаряд. У Широкій Балці Станіславської громади поранення дістала 3-річна дитина: уламками скла дівчинці поранило голову. Загалом в області за добу поранено п’ятьох цивільних. Нагадаємо, в Деснянському районі Києва впали уламки ракети РФ. Там загинуло три особи, з них одна дитина, десять людей постраждали (серед них дитина). Є постраждалі у Дніпровському районі столиці. Як повідомлялося, українські захисники знищили усі повітряні цілі ворога, випущені по Києву: сім ракет Іскандер-М та три – Іскандер-К. Новини від 1News в Telegram. Підписуйтесь на наш канал
https://t.me/ua_1news
 ПІДПИСАТИСЯ на Telegram-канал 1NEWS Джерело


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Дуже важка ніч, важкий ранок і непростий день. За всім цим лише тепер згадав, що сьогодні могло б виповнитися 69 років нашому землякові, видатному композитору – Ігорю Білозіру.
У ніч на 9 травня 2000 року двоє pociян пoбили його у центрі Львова за те, що зробив зауваження відвідувачам кавʼярні, які співали poсійcький «блaтняк».
Майже три тижні лікарі боролися за його життя, на жаль, врятувати так і не змогли.
«Мамина світлиця», «Ніби вчора», «Віщий сон» – знайдіть час, переслухайте. Сьогодні по-особливому варто.
Світла памʼять вам, Ігорю Йосиповичу.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
#Історіїмісцьвійни

#меморіалізаціявійни
«
Дуже важливо, щоб музей чи місця пам’яті не нагадували, ну скажімо, совкові «вічні вогні», коли так званий «вічний вогонь» запалюється раз у році на пів години, [далі його] гасять, і за нього більше ніхто не пам’ятає»
, – каже протоієрей Андрій Галавін, настоятель храму Святого Апостола Андрія Первозванного та всіх святих землі української у Бучі.
Біля цього храму була братська могила, зараз розробляється проєкт музею. Протоієрей Андрій каже, що, попри трагічність цього місця, важливо, щоб майбутній меморіальний простір був «не тільки місцем памʼяті, а й місцем утвердження перемоги».
Свідчення
 протоієрея Андрія Галавіна є одним із тих, які Державне агентство розвитку туризму України зібрало під час роботи над концепцією маршрутів памʼяті війни. Публікуємо короткий фрагмент його інтервʼю.
Цей та
інші записи
 інтервʼю ДАРТ передав на зберігання до Архіву усної історії Українського інституту національної пам'яті.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🙄
 Через токсичність і ордер на арешт, путіна поки що «раді приймати» у Китаї. Пояснює Центр стратегічних комунікацій
У рамках третього міжнародного форуму «Один пояс – один шлях» 17-18 жовтня КНР відвідає президент рф путін.
▶
 Через ордер на арешт Міжнародного кримінального суду путін став «нев’їзним» до більшості країн світу. Тому він їздить лише туди, куди його поки ще запрошують.
▶
 Візит путіна до КНР не має державного характеру, а відбувається у рамках багатостороннього формату (як керівника однієї з багатьох національних делегацій).
▶
 Під керівництвом путіна росія щодня поглиблює свою міжнародну ізоляцію, слабне, стає вразливішою. Тому сьогодні намагається стати якщо не союзником, то хоча б васалом КНР.
▶
 Розпочавши повномасштабну війну з Україною, рф загнала себе у пастку, а її поведінка стає дедалі імпульсивнішою і небезпечнішою. Такі рішення як розміщення ядерної зброї в білорусі суперечать інтересам Китаю.
▶
 Не рф, а КНР буде вирішувати про рівень і обсяги російсько-китайських відносин. Пекін сповна користується дешевими енергоресурсами, які рф вже не може реалізовувати на Заході, однак не поспішає йти на зустріч очікуванням москви.
👆

Підписатись на Spravdi


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
❗
СБУ викрила чотирьох блогерів, які опублікували відео ворожих «прильотів» по Києву 2 січня. Їм загрожує до 12 років тюрми
Зранку 2 січня вони здійснили несанкціоновану відеозйомку ворожих «прильотів» по місту та розмістили відповідні медіафайли у соцмережах. Ці відео миттєво «підхопили» численні пропагандистські пабліки країни-агресора та інформресурси спецслужб рф, зокрема Телеграм-канал Шарія, якому інкримінують державну зраду.
Отриману інформацію окупанти та їхні поплічники могли використовувати для підготовки нових та коригування повторних повітряних ударів по Києву. Публікація таких медіафайлів розцінюється як коригування ворожого вогню, за що передбачено покарання до 12 років тюрми.
👉
Київ Новини | Підписатись