[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
#ЦПД_повідомляє
:
🔻
У США планується антивоєнний мітинг з вимогою припинити військову допомогу Україні та розпочати мирні переговори.
🔹
Лібертаріанська та Народна партії США організовують мітинг під назвою «Лютуй проти воєнної машини». Під час мітингу спікери планують звернутися до президента Джо Байдена з низкою вимог, зокрема щодо війни в Україні. Серед них - "припинення фінансування війни" та заклик до "дипломатичного врегулювання конфлікту".
🔻
В оголошенні зустрічаються російські наративи про те, що розширення НАТО на схід спровокувало російське вторгнення, а війна проти України призвела до загрози ядерної війни з росією.
🔸
Серед запрошених спікерів - колишні політики, журналісти, активісти й музиканти, які раніше висловлювали проросійську риторику, включаючи колишню членкиню Демократичної партії США Тулсі Габбард та співзасновника Pink Floyd Роджера Вотерса.
🔸
Мітинг запланований на 19 лютого біля Меморіалу Лінкольна в центрі Вашингтона.
#stoprussia
TG
 |
FB
 |
INST
 |
YT
 |
TW
 |
TT


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Дело Коломойского начинают разваливать по процессуальным нарушениям.
Такова реакция Зеленского на «тёплый приём» во время визита в США.
По Коломойскому в США есть двухпартийный консенсус – экстрадиция и суд.
Сейчас бывшим собственникам Приватбанка Игорю Коломойскому и Геннадию Боголюбову в США выдвинуто обвинение в создании преступной сети – дело слушается Канцлерском суда штата Делавер, который принял решение о рассмотрении дела по процедуре акта RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act – закон, принятый в США для борьбы с организованной преступностью, разработан с целью преследования как юридических лиц, так и любой группы фактически объединённых людей), что не делает никаких различий между характером сообществ или организаций вовлечённых в процесс расследования, таким образом любая организация, хоть государственная, так и политическая, общественная, благотворительная даже неформальная вовлечённая в процесс автоматически становится объектом расследования.
В ходе рассмотрения этого дела дела в Канцлерском суде может быть установлен факт связи компаний Владимира Зеленского со структурами Игоря Коломойского и Геннадия Боголюбова и выводом $5,5 млрд из Приватбанка.
Простыми словами, Зеленский не получил гарантий безопасности и Коломойский остаётся в Украине.

https://t.me/beregpravy/5499


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Политолог, кандидат политических наук Александр Страхов (
@falconianthreads
) специально для «Консерватора»:

Украинские традиции

предательства
19 (29) октября 1657 года священник Максим Филимонович писал замечательному русскому просветителю, царскому другу Фёдору Ртищеву:
«Им
[малорусской верхушке]
не хочетца кабаков и панства своего отстать, купетства ради, а не посполитого добра; а царское б величество да изволил… в
Чернигов бы воеводу доброго прислать
».

Письмо написано 350 с лишним лет назад, но читатель, верно, уже прикинул эти печальные строки на современность и догадался, о чём пойдёт речь.
Малороссийская верхушка никогда не отличалась верностью и постоянством.

Возьмём список гетманов со времён Богдана Хмельницкого и посмотрим, на кого делала ставку неискушённая в малороссийских верхах царская власть.

После смерти Богдана Хмельницкого в 1657 году к власти пришёл его сын Юрий. Однако, будучи ещё юношей, он передал власть сподвижнику отца — Ивану Выговскому — и уехал учиться в Киев.

Иван Выговский по происхождению был поляком и в 1658 году подписал с Польшей Гадячский договор, фактически закончив восстание и вернувшись в подданство короля. Выговский участвовал в Конотопской битве, краеугольном камне украинской пропаганды. В 1664 году Выговский, которому чем-то не угодил король, втайне руководил антипольским восстанием и был расстрелян.
Две измены.

После измены Выговского гетманом стал Иван Беспалый, который никогда не переходил на сторону Польши, но добровольно сложил полномочия в пользу подросшего Юрия Хмельницкого, за что в благодарность был расстрелян. В 1660 году Юрий присягнул на верность польскому королю. Гетманом стал его дядя Яким Самко, малорусский мещанин, которого перед царём постоянно оклеветывал его конкурент — Иван Брюховецкий. В 1663 году в результате интриг епископа Мефодия — того самого священника Михаила, писавшего Ртищеву, — Брюховецкий казнил честнейшего Якима, что вызвало реакцию русских чиновников на местах:
«Свиньи учинились в начальстве и обрали в гетманы свинью»
, но до царя не дошло. В 1667 году Брюховецкий перешёл на сторону польского подданного, гетмана Петра Дорошенко, а после — на сторону Турции, но Дорошенко схватил Брюховецкого, небрежно махнул рукой — и того убили.
Итого: три измены.

Запутались? Это присказка, не сказка. Дорошенко тоже перешёл на сторону султана! Получив через несколько лет живительную встряску от русского воеводы Ромодановского, Дорошенко сдался и… получил воеводство на Вятке да имение под Москвой (тут уж читатель должен забиться в конвульсиях от смеха), где и скончался. Итого за всю карьеру Дорошенко набрал
 четыре измены
 и пока лидирует в нашем рейтинге.

Но в путаном списке предательств и перебежек мы потеряли тяжеловеса данного вида спорта. В 1662 году Юрий Хмельницкий отрёкся от гетманства, чтобы уйти в монастырь и страстно жалеть о своём решении. В 1668 году он радостно поддержал переход Дорошенко под турецкую власть, посидел в Константинополе консервной банкой и после падения Дорошенко был назначен гетманом. Прибыв в Малороссию, Юрий тут же начал строить планы о побеге к христианским государям, но под пристальным надзором турецкого паши остался «турецким» гетманом. В 1681 году турки его сместили, а в 1683 году назначили вновь. Через два года османский паша удушил опостылевшего всем Юрия Богдановича, чем оказал большую услугу вообще всем причастным: и султану, и царю, и королю, и Малороссии. Если честно, к концу рассказа
я и сам сбился со счёта, сколько и куда перебегал Юрий.

Даже из такого путаного рассказа видно, что предательство и измены — это modus operandi юго-западной элиты.
Так что, может, всё же прислушаться к совету Максима Филимоновича и не искать в Малороссии союзников, а «присылать воевод»?
Человек-то знал, о чём говорил.
Подписывайтесь на канал «Консерватор»


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Ці меседжі в тій чи іншій формі нам доносять наші партнери, ключові світові гравці, нажаль. Світ цинічний, політика - безмежно цинічна.
Вони дають нам зброю, щоб ми були достатньо сильними аби стримати російську навалу і не допустити війни в Європі, але не настільки сильними, щоб знищити росію і похитнути економічний зиск наших союзників.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User] В Киеве со здания КГГА отмывают краску, которой вчера облили табличку во время митинга с требованием к местной власти тратить деньги из бюджета на ВСУ, а не брусчатку и прочие невоенные траты.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Как иронично, однако, вышло с "регулированием винтиков"
👹

Остаться с нами в Телеграм
 |
Восхититься нашим YouTube


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Выжженная земля и полностью разрушенные многоэтажки
: Tg-каналы публикуют кадры из прифронтового Угледара.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Ближній бій. Як єгері ДШВ брали штурмом позиції росіян в районі Бахмута
Воїни 71-ї окремої єгерської бригади Десантно-штурмових військ Збройних Сил України розповідають як знищують  російських окупантів в районі Бахмута Донецької області.
– Бахмут – це справжня фортеця! – відзначають захисники України.
Разом до Перемоги! ДШВ – Завжди Перші! Слава Україні!
🇺🇦
🇺🇦
🇺🇦
#stoprussia

#ДШВ

#ЗСУ

#Завжди_Перші

#UkrainianAirAssaultForces
#AirAssaultForces

#WarInUkraine

#RussianAggression
#BattleOfUkrainianAirAssaultForces


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🟥
 росіяни створили «армію ботів», щоб сіяти «зраду» серед українців про Бахмут та ЗСУ. Розкриваємо всю схему брехунів

Армія рф не може взяти Бахмут, тому пропагандисти намагаються послабити ЗСУ, посіявши зневіру серед українців.
Центр стратегічних комунікацій разом зі Страткомом ЗСУ дослідили основні меседжі росіян, які сіють «зраду» довкола ситуації в місті-фортеці.
Які меседжи просувають пропагандисти та як працюють російські боти, читайте у нашому спільному матеріалі
👆
Підписуйтесь на
@SPRAVDI
 та
@AFUStratCom
 – щоб бути завжди в курсі інформаційних атак ворога.
👆

Telegram
 |
Сайт
 |
Instagram
 |
Twitter
 |
Facebook
 |
Viber


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Дорогие кировчане!
Поздравляем вас Днем Крещения Руси!
Крещение Руси – это знаковый и важный этап в истории становления русского православия и российской государственности. Крещение позволило сделать так, чтобы Россия процветала как экономически, культурно и духовно развитое государство.
Обращение Великого князя Владимира и всей Руси в православие имело определяющее значение для истории нашего Отечества и на протяжении более тысячи лет занимает особое место в жизни России.
Этот праздник возвращает нас к началам российской государственности, способствует сохранению памяти об истоках славянской культуры, духовности и объединению многонационального народа нашей Родины на основе принципов патриотизма, испокон веков укреплявшего государство.
Желаем вам крепкого здоровья, счастья и благополучия, новых свершений на благо города Кировское!


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🇺🇦
🎥
🇺🇦

Про современных иезуитов или как информационно перебивали тему утверждения в стране концлагеря
Сегодня депутаты проголосовали 100% антинародный закон. Почему антинародный? Потому что он не устраивает ни армию - не разрешил демобилизацию, ни народ - вводит меры драконовской мобилизации!
Итак как офисные помойки и ермасята пытались переубедить общественность, что ничего страшного не произошло:
✅
 начали с пряника - пообещали 70 тысяч тем, кто на передовой.
О том, как лишали предыдущих льгот, как считают, кто на передовой, а кто нет - умолчали;
✅
потом пошли "кнуты" -  Чмут, рассказавший, что нужно мобилизовать с 20 лет.
Задумка - все должны радоваться, что мобилизовать пока будут "ЛИШЬ" с 25;
✅
затем - нардеп Марьяна Безуглая, поддержавшая мобилизацию женщин "иначе будем уничтожены".
А женщин же пока не гребут - ну вот, опять "демократия", радуйтесь глупцы - классный Закон
;
✅
Потом рассказали как много за время Большой войны заработал Порошенко.
Страна воюет, а Крыголам богатеет - ату его!;
✅
Но больше всего нас порадовало, что офисные помойки и ермасята "вдруг" заметили мирный план Эрдогана Стамбул-2. Через Новую Газету вбросили описание опубликованных документов. Но упоминать, что  первыми их опубликовали наши коллеги из Резидента, конечно, не стали. И вся «офисная» помойка по команде отработала нарратив.
И документы и предложения Эрдогана по условиям мира игнорировали 3 недели! Не смотря на заявления о них Лаврова и Шойгу.
 Вспомнили только когда понадобилось дать народу надежду - пусть отвлекутся от закона ложной надеждой о мире.
Почитали комментарии на этих помойках - работают боты. Причём одни и те же. Не позволяют дискуссии скатится к войне до 1991 года. Пусть пипл потешится возможным миром.
А для патриотов вышел Подоляк и заявил, что только 1991 год.
Итого, всех развели по чатам и каждому дали своё
🤷
О том, что Зеленский под давлением США, как мы писали, отказался от предложения Эрдогана - ни слова. Иезуиты, что с них возьмёшь!
Кстати, лишний раз спалился наш ермасёнок-Миша. Тоже написал про инициативу, как про новую, прямо как Труха и ко. Конечно, его подписчики в чате сразу поправили, но он сделал вид, что не заметил. Заказ отработал, побеждал дальше, благо, новостей много, быстро забывается.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User] Зеленському сьогодні показали карту з зеленими зонами, які ще два дні тому були червоними, і на вулицях Бахмута теж. Недарма приїхав.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Российские крылатые ракеты Х-22, которыми был нанесён удар по Киеву, неуязвимы для украинской противовоздушной обороны
Об этом сообщил американский журнал Military Watch Magazine. Издание утверждает, что официальные лица Украины сетуют на то, что ракеты этого типа невозможно перехватить. Они были разработаны для обхода многоуровневой системы ПВО.
@radiomirby
Странно. Те же самые официальные лица постоянно заявляют, что украинская ПВО сбила все российские ракеты... Или это не те же самые лица?


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Свята — це час, коли кожному хочеться бути поряд із рідними. Близько 1000 бійців 12-ї бригади спеціального призначення
#Азов
 позбавлені цієї можливості вже 19 місяців.
Мужні воїни-оборонці Маріуполя, які стримували наступ противника, завʼязавши на себе переважаючі сили ворога, виграли час для всієї країни.
Ми памʼятаємо про них щосекунди та продовжуємо боротьбу, аби повернути з полону кожного. З полону, що вбиває.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🇺🇦
«
Мы не остановимся, пока мы не вернем себе свой город, наш Мариуполь, наш дом»
Об этом заявил Илья Самойленко, офицер управления разведки «Азова», во время Киевского форума безопасности.
«Мы не останемся в истории героями одной битвы. Еще все сражения впереди».


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
❗
Полиция опубликовала видео с расследование страшного
расстрела
 на Глушко
ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
Прислать Новость


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🤡

"Я в бешенстве, русский город утюжат", - кремлівський пропагандист Соловйов про деокупацію Шебекіно
Пропагандисти визнають досягнення російських добровольців у Бєлгородській області. Приємно.
@censor_net
| Ми у
Facebook
 та
 Twitter


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User] 30 "кiнджалiв" сбили, рапортуют киевские власти))) Какие же идиоты!)) А попадания явно в такие места, о которых они никогда открыто не скажут. Кинжалами абы куда не бьют.