[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Пресс-конференция Зеленского. Главные выводы

Вчерашняя большая пресс-конференция Зеленского сильно отличалась от тех, что он проводил ранее, после начала вторжения. Гораздо меньше «победного» настроения, ответы краткие и, зачастую, неконкретные. Видно, что президент нервничает, срывается на перепалку с журналистами.

Изменения эти произошли на фоне известных событий - отсутствие успехов на фронте, неудача наступления, на которое возлагались большие надежды, проблем с западной помощью, а также нарастающее внутриполитическое и социальное напряжением (в том числе и из-за мобилизации). В этой связи у журналистов было много вопросов по конфликту с Залужным и о планах по увольнению главкома ВСУ. На них президент прямо не отвечал, но и не опровергал, подчеркивая наличие вопросов, на которые должно дать ответ военное командование с намеком, что именно оно несет ответственность за самые «неудобные» темы – ситуацию на фронте и с мобилизацией. То есть, Зеленский, по сути, подтвердил, как минимум, отсутствие полного взаимопонимания с Залужным, которого он назвал «Валерой», сравнив его с Безуглой – мол оба любят писать в соцсетях, делать селфи и собирать лайки.
Но самым важным моментом, безусловно, была тема по мобилизации. С нее пресс-конференция началась и к ней президент возвращался неоднократно.

Зеленский заявил, что командование предлагает призвать в армию до полумиллиона человека, но он эту цифру не утвердил по двум причинам.

Первая - отсутствие предложений по ротации и демобилизации тех, кто давно в окопах. Вторая - мобилизация в предложенном военными формате будет стоить бюджету дополнительно 500 миллиардов гривен и нет пока понимания откуда их взять.

Само по себе то, что президент предал огласке свою дискуссию с военными о планах по мобилизации – беспрецедентно. Обычно такие цифры (и, тем более планы) – это военная тайна.

Поэтому у некоторых наблюдателей сразу возникли сомнения в том, что Зеленский озвучил реальную ситуацию, а не решил сыграть в «доброго полицейского» на фоне недовольства в обществе жесткими методами мобилизации: мол, «военные и Залужный хотят забирать всех поголовно, но я им не даю» (в это же вписывается и отказ Зеленского поддержать мобилизацию женщин). Также есть сомнения в том, что военкомы вообще в принципе способным набрать столько людей в армию в условиях тотальной коррупции и массового уклонения от службы.

Но если допустить, что Зеленский сказал все как есть на самом деле, то из этого следуют важные выводы.

Прежде всего, стоит сказать, что чисто военная логика в предложении призвать до полумиллиона человек есть - в нынешней войне основная ударная сила в наступлении это пехота. И, чем больше пехоты, тем больше шансов на продвижение.
При этом подобная тактика - это очень большие потери личного состава и очень большие деньги на содержание армии.
И если Зеленский считает, что Украина не готова к таким жертвам и издержкам, то встает вопрос о том, как дальше продолжать войну.
Тогда нужно снимать задачу идти в наступление «до границ 1991 года» и уходить в глухую оборону имеющимися силами (что, по факту, сейчас уже и происходит). Или начинать переговоры с Россией об окончании войны. Но эти переговоры, как заявил сам президент на пресс-конференции, он считает неактуальными.
При этом вариант ухода в оборону также порождает вопросы – какие цели в таком случае? Тянуть время в надежде на то, что когда-нибудь в России закончатся солдаты или наступит внутренняя смута и развал армии? Или расчет на то, что западные союзники колоссально нарастят производство неких качественно новых видов вооружений, которые позволят ВСУ одержать победу малыми силами? Или что НАТО напрямую вступит в войну на стороне Украины? И есть ли уверенность, что время в такой войне «на истощение» работает на Украину и что условия окончания войны через, например, год будут выгоднее, чем могли бы быть сейчас? Или они окажутся гораздо хуже?

Зеленский по этому поводу ничего не говорил. Хотя, возможно, он уже знает ответы на эти вопросы. Только пока не готов их озвучить.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Вице-премьер Марат Хуснуллин доложил Президенту о реализации работы по финансированию новых регионов
В рамках госпрограмм на территориях новых субъектов работает 16 федеральных органов исполнительной власти.
📊
По словам Марата Хуснуллина, 73% средств по госпрограммам от запланированных уже переданы, а еще 27% финансов находятся в процессе реализации.
✅
100% средств уже направлено Минстроем, Минспортом, Минтрансом, Минкультом, Минпромторгом, Росреестром и Минфином. В ближайшее время все средства будут доведены до регионов.
🔍
Работа координируется совместно с регионами.
❗
Президент поручил Председателю Правительства Михаилу Мишустину провести анализ работы и представить отчет по финансированию отраслевых программ по новым регионам к 30 июня.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
До речі, з цікавого, Орбан на офіційній сторінці виклав відео перед початком зустрічі, що буде стояти на своєму і що в нього чітка позиція.
🤡
🤡
🤡


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
#сплетни

Банковая
запустила антикриз по аграрному
 скандалу.
Миша Подоляк получил по шапке за медийные провалы и выступил с заявлением, что не стоит обращать внимание на риторику польских властей, так как там выборы.
"
Любая страна может защищать свои национальные экономические пространства, и это вопрос диалогов, включая юридические конфликты. Это нормально. Спокойно нужно относиться к тому, что сегодня в Польше достаточно активный избирательный процесс, они имеют право говорить со своим населением, как желают, и в то же время могут критически относиться к любым предложениям других стран, включая Украину
", - сказал Миша Подоляк.
То есть дают заднюю по полной. Ох и дилетанты…
Вопрос, зачем было понты гонять?


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
👊
 Навіщо НАТО організовує наймасштабніші навчання з часів «холодної війни». Пояснює Центр стратегічних комунікацій
Наступного тижня розпочнуться навчання НАТО Steadfast Defender-2024, які триватимуть до травня.
▶
 В анонсованих навчаннях, що відбудуться на території Німеччини, Польщі та країн Балтії візьмуть участь близько 90 тисяч військових. Це
найбільші навчання Альянсу з часу завершення «холодної війни»
.
▶
 НАТО продемонструє свою здатність зміцнити євроатлантичний регіон за допомогою трансатлантичного
переміщення сил з Північної Америки.
▶
 Навчання імітуватимуть початок війни внаслідок
нападу уявного ворога (Оккасус), що нагадує рф, на одну з країн-членів НАТО.
▶
 Масштабні навчання Steadfast Defender-2024 –
реакція на загрози регіональній безпеці, породжені війною росії
 проти України, у відповідь на які НАТО продемонструє свій потенціал.
▶
 Посилення НАТО відповідає національним інтересам України та
збільшує спроможності Альянсу надавати підтримку своїм державам-членам у відсічі російській агресії.
✅

Підписатись на Spravdi у WhatsApp


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Наводнения в Германии не отступают, исторический центр Дрездена спасают от затопления
По всей Германии продолжаются
наводнения,
 начавшиеся незадолго до Рождества из-за обильных дождей. Уровень воды в реках поднялся, прибрежные поля превратились в озёра, перекрыты многие дороги. В городе Нортхайм и общине Упленген в Нижней Саксонии прорвало плотины, в городах Ринтельн и общине Зандкруг объявлена эвакуация. Высокая вода ожидается и в городе Брауншвейг на реке Окер, а также в Бремене на реке Везер.
Особенно сложная ситуация в Дрездене, который называют «Флоренцией на Эльбе». Уровень воды в реке поднялся на 5,85 метра, затоплена набережная. Под угрозой оказался и исторический центр города с галереями и музеями. Вокруг зданий возводят деревянные ограды, которые должны задержать воду. Прекратил работу дрезденский цирк, чьи шатры были установлены на берегу Эльбы.


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Сьогодні виповнюється 114 років від дня народження народної художниці Марії Примаченко.

В умовах повномасштабної війни постать мисткині для мешканців Київщини стала символом боротьби не тільки за свої землі, а й за українські традиції, мистецтво та ідентичність. За право бути українцем. Неймовірна героїчна історія порятунку 14 картин Примаченко з Краєзнавчого музею в Іванкові, в який влучив російський снаряд, облетіла весь світ.

Спільно з партнерами створили каталог “Врятоване мистецтво”, в якому зібрали роботи та описи картин, що стали не під силу російським ракетам і вогню. Також у каталозі зібрані унікальні фото Марії із сімейного архіву та проєкт реконструкції музею.

Ми обовʼязково відбудуємо пошкоджений музей в Іванкові. Українців неможливо знищити. Із кожною наступною атакою українське коріння ще глибше розростається в землі та міцніє.
🇺🇦
 Олексій Кулеба |

Голова Київської ОВА


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Официальная сводка Представительства ДНР в СЦКК с 00:00 16.09.2023 по 00:00 17.09.2023 года
❗
За истекшие сутки Представительство
сообщало
 о 67 фактах ведения огня со стороны ВФУ.
🆘
Поступили сведения о гибели 6 гражданских лиц в
Кировском
 и
Куйбышевском
 районах Донецка,
Светлодарске
.
🚑
Ранения различной степени тяжести получили 9 гражданских лиц, в т.ч. ребенок 2010 г.р.
#ДетиНеМишень
, в
Кировском и Куйбышевском
 районах Донецка.
🏠
Повреждены 11 жилых домостроений
 в
Куйбышевском и Кировском
 районах Донецка,
Светлодарске
,
Никитовском и Центрально-Городском
 районах Горловки, а также
3 объекта

гражданской инфраструктуры
.
Под вражеским огнем оказались районы семи населенных пунктов Республики
: Светлодарск, Горловка (Никитовский и Центрально-Городской район), Ясиноватая, Ясиноватский район, столица г. Донецк (Куйбышевский, Кировский, Киевский, Петровский районы), Старомихайловка, Макеевка (Червоногвардейский район).
На донецком направлении противник совершил 40 обстрелов из артиллерии 155 мм, в т.ч. с кассетной боевой частью.
На горловском 19 обстрелов из РСЗО, артиллерии 152 и 155 мм, в т.ч. с кассетной боевой частью.
На ясиноватском 6 обстрелов из артиллерии 155 мм.
На светлодарском 1 обстрел из РСЗО.
Выпущена 241 единица различных боеприпасов.
В
предыдущие
 сутки со стороны ВФУ зафиксировано 35 обстрелов.
@online_dnr_sckk


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🦠

В Украине продлили карантин из-за COVID-19 до 30 июня
Об этом сообщил представитель правительства в ВР Мельничук:
«Продлен для единой государственной системы гражданской защиты на всей территории Украины режим чрезвычайной ситуации до 30 июня 2023 года. Также продлен карантин на всей территории Украины до 30 июня 2023 года».
Ссылка на нас -
https://t.me/+XQJhAcf4zqUyZDMy
Одесса как она есть
 |
Наша инста
 |
Написать нам


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🌓
 Сегодняшний восход луны
Ссылка на нас -
https://t.me/+XQJhAcf4zqUyZDMy
Одесса как она есть
 |
Наша инста
 |
Написать нам


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Психологічна стійкість підрозділу. Порадник командиру
Чому один підрозділ в бою стійкіший, ніж інший? Що сприяє формуванню стійкості підрозділу та окремого військовослужбовця? Яким чином командир здатний підвищити стійкість підрозділу? Цей порадник має на меті відповісти на ці питання.
Військові підрозділи спираються на чітку ієрархію, правила та накази, які регулюють повсякденне життя та службу солдата.
Але кожен командир знає, що лише вимог виконувати накази «згідно зі статутом» часто буває недостатньо. Умови бою вимагають більшого — готовності ризикувати та жертвувати собою.
Цього неможливо досягти виключно дисципліною або патріотичними закликами.
⬇
⬇
⬇
Читати порадник на сайті SprotyvG7.com.ua


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
🥷
 Наступні 5 тижнів буду називати цього дядьку «Сенсей»)))
👨🏫
А Юра за це обіцяє разом з колегами навчити всім методам та підходам журналістких розслідувань на своїх курсах.
🔜
 Так що, шановні мої корупціонери, скоро будемо вас розслідувати ще краще) Я б сказав, дамо по яйцям
🥚


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
"Показували відрізані голови побратимів": звільнений воїн ЗСУ розповів про полон у ПВК "Вагнер"
47-річний Олександр Коваль пробув у полоні 40 днів. Його утримували в приміщенні колишньої взуттєвої фабрики на Донбасі разом із приблизно сотнею військовополонених у тісних та сирих камерах. Причому, без питної води, з мінімумом їжі – один сухпайок доводилося ділити на трьох.
"Показують – свіжі, відрізані голови наших хлопців, насаджені на арматуру. Один каже: "Це Едік, а це – Валера. Вони хотіли, щоб усе було за Женевськими конвенціями. Ти теж хочеш за конвенціями? Місце для третього є. Розповідав, що він робить із полоненими, як відриває голови. Справжній садист, маніяк. Я попрощався із життям, мені вже нічого не було страшно. Картинка стояла перед очима – покійна бабуся, братик, сонце, тепло, і я маленький"
, – розповів військовий.
🇺🇦
Реальная Война


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User] Генштабу удалось провести операцию по взятию Авдеевки при минимальных потерях , oперация войдёт в учебники Минобороны — Шойгу


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
💬

Сергій Крук:

"У День Києва росіяни привітали мешканців столиці нічними обстрілами.
Залякування та терор не знищать нашу сміливість. Київські рятувальники за роботою.
Дякую!
🇺🇦
"
Фото:
Pavlo Petrov


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
На першому етапі забезпечили за рахунок міського бюджету всі заклади охорони здоров'я генераторами. А тепер встановлюємо й сонячні електростанції. Вже встановлено для однієї лікарні, розпочато процес для другої та для двох закладів соціального захисту.

Паралельно ми також проводимо термомодернізацію будівель бюджетної сфери. В проєкті вже беруть участь 17 дитячих садочків, 18 шкіл та один позашкільний заклад. І кількість об’єктів буде зростати.  Ми утеплюємо стіни, встановлюємо теплові пункти, нові вікна, замінюємо системи опалення та інше.

Для реалізації цих напрямів ми впроваджуємо європейський механізм енергосервісу. Він дозволяє робити все вищезазначене не на кошти міського бюджету, а за рахунок інвестицій. Нашим партнером є Програма розвитку Організації Об'єднаних Націй (UNDP). Разом ми вже почали реалізацію кілька пілотних проєктів. Тепер для розширення можливостей підписали з Постійним представником UNDP в Україні Jaco Cilliers Меморандум про системне співробітництво, в рамках якого в місті буде реалізовано 17 проєктів.

- Завдяки відкритості, прозорості та чіткому виконанню всіх домовленостей ми розширюємо спектр спільних проєктів, зокрема, з Бельгією. Бельгійські інженери та інвестори активно брали участь у створенні промисловості Кривого Рогу наприкінці XIX сторіччя. Цей факт назвав дуже важливим під час візиту до нашого міста Надзвичайний і Повноважний Посол Королівства Бельгії в Україні Петер Ван де Вельде. Ми відновлюємо тісні стосунки і нашими наступними кроками буде реалізація спільних ініціатив в економічній та гуманітарній сферах.

- Продовжуємо надавати допомогу людям, чиї квартири та будинки постраждали внаслідок ворожої ракетної атаки 1 квітня. Нагадую, було пошкоджено 68 квартир у 19 багатоповерхівках та 4 будинка приватного сектора, вибито 428 вікон у квартирах та під’їздах. Бригади комунальників та управителів працювали кілька днів у посиленому режимі над ліквідацією наслідків. Усі вікна протягом двох днів були закриті плівкою та ОСБ, після буде проводиться скління, там де людям була потрібна допомога – вона була надана. Прийнято 66 заявок про надання матеріальної допомоги від міста за пошкоджене майно. Для кожної квартири чи будинку розмір допомоги буде визначатися індивідуально, залежно від завданої шкоди. Усього з початку війни матеріальну допомогу від міста отримали вже 4 139 людей на суму 136,754 млн грн.

- Та про наші мирні перемоги. Наші Нескорені завоювали ще кілька медалей на всеукраїнських змаганнях ветеранів. Наша команда – найкраща за результатами змагань! Команда нашої 17 танкової бригади виборола 1 місце з волейболу сидячи. У стрільбі з лука 1 місце виборов Євген Олійник, а 2 місце - Гордєєв Сергій. А у настільному тенісі – "бронза" у бійця 17-ї танкової (прізвище на прохання не називаю). Таким чином за результатами змагань команда Кривого Рогу завоювала 18 перших місць 8 других і одне третє місце. Всього 27 нагород – наша команда найпотужніша по кількості призових місць! Вітаю від усіх криворіжців! Пишаємось нашими Нескореними!

- Шановні земляки! Прошу бути обережними - на Дніпропетровщині встановилась майже суха погода з сильними поривами вітру. За повідомленням ДСНС з 7 по 8 квітня оголошено попередження - на території Дніпропетровської області очікується висока (IV класу), місцями надзвичайна (V класу) пожежна небезпека. У місті знову почастішали випадки пожеж в екосистемі. Будьте обережні самі та стежте за дітьми - працівникам ДСНС вистачає роботи крім того, щоб гасити очерети і суху траву.

Такі короткі підсумки цього тижня. Як би не було важко, Кривий Ріг та всі ми працюємо на нашу Перемогу. Дякую кожному, хто робить свій внесок!
Зберігаємо спокій, витримку, допомагаємо один одному, віримо у нашого Президента та наші незламні Збройні Сили!

Скучної вам ночі, дорогі земляки!
Слава Кривбасу та Слава Україні!


[System]
You are an expert in the cliche manipulation technique. Thought-Terminating Cliché: Uses common phrases to shut down critical thinking and discussion. List phrases that provide evidence of cliche in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the cliche manipulation.
To effectively develop a classifier for identifying Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs) in the given examples, you'll want to establish clear guidelines based on patterns, contexts, and linguistic cues that distinguish genuine TTCs from legitimate or critical discourse. Here’s a set of classification guidelines tailored to your target audience:

### Classification Guidelines for Thought-Terminating Clichés (TTCs)

1. **Identify Common Phrases**:
   - TTCs are typically phrases that appear clichéd or overly simplistic, often dismissed as common wisdom. Look for expressions that are universally recognized, repetitive, and lack substantive argumentation.
   - Examples: “Everything will be fine,” “It is what it is,” “Just trust us,” etc.

2. **Analyze Context**:
   - Examine the context in which phrases are used. Statements that shut down discourse by negating questions or concerns can be classified as TTCs.
   - If a sentence implies that further discussion is unnecessary or futile, such as “There’s nothing more to say,” it can indicate a TTC.

3. **Look for Emotional Language**:
   - TTCs often employ emotionally charged language designed to provoke a visceral reaction rather than rational debate. Identify phrases that appeal to fear, nationalism, or collective sentiment without fostering dialogue.
   - Phrases like “Our country is under attack,” or “Victory is our only option” can be red flags.

4. **Check for Oversimplification**:
   - Watch for statements that minimize complex issues into binary choices. Language that simplifies matters into “us vs. them” is a typical feature of TTCs.
   - Example: “You're either with us or against us.”

5. **Monitor for Dismissive Tone**:
   - TTCs often come with a tone that dismisses opposition or critical perspectives. Look for phrases that belittle dissent or express disdain for questioning the status quo.
   - Example: "Those who doubt are not real patriots."

6. **Recognize Commanding Statements**:
   - Statements that enforce compliance or directive without allowance for conversation can serve as TTCs. Framing phrases as orders or imperatives can stifle further discussion.
   - Example: “Follow the leader,” or “This is how it must be done.”

7. **Avoid Misclassifying Nuanced Discussions**:
   - Be cautious not to classify texts that engage in nuanced critiques or complex arguments as TTCs simply because they are partisan or controversial. Separate genuine discourse from cliché expressions.
   - Analyze the structure of the argument, paying attention to the depth and breadth of ideas presented.

8. **Filter for Redundancy**:
   - Look for redundancy or repetition in language that signals a lack of critical thought. If a term or phrase recurs in a manner that suggests its use as an anchor for arguments without justification, it may indicate a TTC.
   - Example: “Again, we must remember…”

9. **Flag for Cultural and Social Influences**:
   - Understand that cultural contexts can influence what is considered a TTC. Phrases that may seem cliché in one culture might resonate differently in another, so a context-aware approach is essential.
   - Example: “We will never forget,” in specific political or social contexts.

10. **Utilize Sentiment Analysis**:
    - Employ sentiment analysis tools to identify highly polarized or emotionally charged statements indicative of TTCs. Neutral or balanced sentiment can indicate more constructive discourse.

### Training your Classifier

- **Data Annotation**: Label your dataset using the guidelines above, ensuring that every example is properly categorized as a TTC or a legitimate expression of thought.
- **Feature Extraction**: Implement natural language processing techniques to extract linguistic features, such as phrase frequency, sentiment scores, and contextual cues.
- **Test and Refine**: Regularly test the classifier against a validation set, refining its ability to minimize false positives and negatives based on your guidelines and observed misclassifications.

By establishing these guidelines, you should be able to enhance the classifier's accuracy in detecting Thought-Terminating Clichés while reducing misclassifications. This dual approach of qualitative and quantitative assessment will help ensure robust and reliable outputs.

[User]
Ордер на арест Путина и детского омбудсмена Беловой будет действовать до конца их жизни,
— BBC со ссылкой на прокурора МУС Карима Хана
Давайте больше, это очень важно.
После того, как МУС в марте 2020 года санкционировал проведение полномасштабного расследования военных преступлений США в Афганистане, власти США аннулировали визу главы суда и ввели экономические санкции против нее и других представителей МУС.
После победы демократа Джо Байдена на президентских выборах суд в Нью-Йорке в январе 2021 года временно заблокировал указ его предшественника Дональда Трампа о введении санкций против членов МУС, ведущих расследование в отношении американских граждан.
В апреле санкции были сняты окончательно. Но выводы судом сделаны верные и уже новый прокурор Хан 28 сентября заявил о том, что суд в Гааге не будет расследовать преступления американских военных и сотрудничавших с ними местных жителей в Афганистане.
Что вызвало критику со стороны западных правозащитников.
Суд блядь