[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Чергове свавілля ТЦК, яке просто викрадає людину з вулиці
В одному з районів
Львова
, ТЦК запакували в бус чоловіка і доставили для проходження ВЛК. При цьому, зі слів дружини постраждалого, повісток на місці затримання чоловіку не вручили. А поки за викликом їхала поліція - ТЦК зробило наказ про мобілізацію, хоча він не пройшов ВЛК.
•••
Підписатися на канал

👤


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
російська армія знову вдарила по Нікопольщині. Від ранку – двічі. До Марганецької громади прилетіло з десяток снарядів з важкої артилерії.
Мешканці села, по якому вгатив ворог, не постраждали. Наслідки атак уточнюються.
В інших містах та районах області сьогодні – без обстрілів.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Ще зовсім трохи — і наш амбасадор Тімоті Снайдер закриє збір на «Ловця шахедів»
⚡
Залишилось зібрати менш як 215 000 $ — мета вже дуже близько.
«
Українці дали нам шанс перевернути це століття, шанс на свободу та безпеку, яких ми не змогли б добитися самотужки, хай ким би ми були. Все, що нам потрібно зробити, це допомогти їм перемогти
», — написав видатний історик у своєму недавньому матеріалі, де навів ключові аргументи, чому світу потрібна українська перемога.
Повністю з ними можна ознайомитись тут:
bit.ly/3JmVHMp
А зробити внесок в історичний збір — за цим посиланням:
u24.gov.ua/shahedhunter


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Резніков обговорить з Макроном F-16 для України під час сьогоднішнього візиту в Париж,
— The Guardian.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Пытливые люди спрашивают: а кто руководил идеологическим отделом ЦК КПУ,
согласовавшим
 создание националистического "Руха" в 1989 г.?
Вы знаете этого человека.
Это Леонид Макарович Кравчук, будущий первый президент Украины.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Сьогодні ми згадуємо та вшановуємо мужність тисячі жителів Кримського півострова, які 26 лютого 2014 року вийшли у Сімферополі на мітинг на підтримку територіальної цілісності України.
Україна обов'язково поверне кордон 1991 року та звільнить від терору окупантів наших людей!
#КримЦеУкраїна
#РазомДоПеремоги
https://t.me/V_Zelenskiy_official/9598


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
«Пошла нах*й эта с*ка» – подсудимый прыгнул на судью в Лас-Вегасе.
Просто чувака не устроило, что судья отказалась назначать ему испытательный срок за побои
😁
 Делона Реддена отправили в тюрьму, а судью в больницу…


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🔔
«Правомобиль» восстанавливает социальную справедливость
Специалисты «
Правомобиля
» посетили Пункт временного размещения в Старобешево, где проживают переселенцы из Артемовска, Соледара и Ясиноватой.
По словам Елены Радомской, советника руководителя ЦИ ОД «ДР», люди, которые находятся в ПВР, не только в Старобешево, а в целом по Республике, как правило, остались без документов. И команда «Правомобиля» активно занимается восстановлением этих документов.
💬
«
Первостепенная задача, которую поставил перед нами Глава Республики, – восстановление социальной справедливости. Наши люди должны получать пенсии, социальные выплаты, у всех должен быть кров над головой
», – рассказала Елена Радомская.
Конечно же, наши земляки уже говорят о намерении поскорее восстановить своё жильё и родные города.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Этот военный конфликт против Украины направлен не только на Киев, Россия атакует нашу правовую систему, Совет Европы и мировой правопорядок
  — глава МИД Германии Бербок
Подписаться


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
‼
Ворог продовжує знищувати все українське на ТОТ і вкотре під ударом - діти
.
🔻
Спочатку наших школярів в окупації змушували співати ворожий гімн та писати листи загарбникам.
🔻
Потім їм промивали мізки пропагандою у дитячих та молодіжних організаціях.
🔻
Нині нове коло зомбі-пропаганди: єдинороси взялися моніторити всі шкільні музеї. Їх хочуть "інтегрувати в загальноросійську систему духовних цінностей".
Окупанти не приховують: всі зусилля у школах направлені на те, аби донести "правильну історію".
Проте цінності ерефії вже майже півтора роки бачить увесь світ. Країна-терорист, країна-сором, країна, яка знищує все живе.
#СпротивНеПодолати
#НашіЛюдиНеЗдаються
#ЧекаємоНаДеокупацію


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Спікер парламенту Стефанчук заперечує конфлікт Зеленського та Залужного.
В інтерв'ю Politico він назвав цю інформацію "чутками" та "російською пропагандою", яка поширювалася "російськими каналами".
"Ніколи не було жодного випадку напруженості між політичним та військовим керівництвом", - заявив Стефанчук.
Нагадаємо, що нещодавно Зеленський публічно закликав Залужного дотримуватися ієрархії і не займатися політикою, чим фактично підтвердив наявність конфлікту.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
😒

 російський ядерний шантаж вийшов на новий рівень. Пояснює Центр стратегічних комунікацій
18 жовтня держдума рф ухвалила законопроєкт про відкликання ратифікації Договору про всеосяжну заборону ядерних випробувань.
▶

Рішення держдуми рф –
черговий російський шантаж
 початком ядерної війни.
▶
 москва регулярно вдається до погроз застосування ядерної  зброї кожного разу,
коли зазнає чергової військової чи дипломатичної поразки.

▶
 Ядерна істерія рф спонукає інші держави розвивати власні ядерні програми, адже
безпекові гарантії москви за відмову України від свого ядерного потенціалу виявилися нічого не вартими
.
▶

росія порушила базовий принцип нерозповсюдження ядерної зброї
, оголосивши про плани розміщення її в білорусі. Не можна також виключати загрози
передачі рф ядерних розробок Ірану та Північній Кореї.
▶
 росія – безвідповідальний розпорядник величезного ядерного арсеналу.
 Тому одним з пріоритетних безпекових завдань на найближчу перспективу не лише союзників України, але й цілого людства повинна стати денуклеаризація рф.
👆

Підписатись на Spravdi


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Підтоплення через підрив росіянами Каховської ГЕС. Ситуація станом на ранок

🔹
Рівень води на Херсонщині може збільшитися ще близько на метр протягом 20 годин, повідомили в ОВА.
🔹
Уночі підтопило Білозерську громаду. Усього підтоплено майже 2 тисячі будинків на правому березі Херсонщини.
🔹
Евакуювали 1457 людей, більшість – із мікрорайону Херсона Корабел.
🔹
У Каховському водосховищі з моменту підриву дамби рівень води впав на 2,5 м, повідомив Олександр Вілкул.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
ЦИПСОшники раздувают по н.п.
Крынки
, мол, "
мы плацдарм взяли
", операция
мясных
 морских котиков приближает "
перемогу
". Однако вся эпопея с Левобережьем -
неоправданные потери со стороны ВФУ.
1. Самый
 главный фактор
 предпринимаемых действий -
обмеление Днепра
, позволившее противнику сократить время переброски групп на левый берег. ВСУ высадились силами ССО и завязали бой, отвлекли части, успели переправится и провели, как утверждается, успешную десантную операцию. На деле же, им дали такую возможность, чтобы на маленьком участке зажать новые развернутые соединения и уничтожать при помощи авиации и артиллерии.
ЭТО МЫ
 им
навязываем
 свою стратегию,
а не они нам
.
2.
Ответ на вопрос
, почему мы их не прогнали предельно прост: пока мы можем уничтожать части 35,36,38 бригад морской пехоты на левом берегу с помощью артиллерии - мы будем этого и добиваться, чтобы не терять своих людей. Каждый 2 подписчик Z-каналов, видел на что похож н.п.
Крынки
. Наша пехота в случае ухода противника с
Крынок
 будет постоянно обстреливаться из ствольной, реактивной и гаубичной артиллерии с правого берега Днепра, по этому мы и не отбиваем населенный пункт, главная задача пехотинцев, которые держат оборону, это не допустить выхода противника в лес под
Крынками
 и не дать ему там закрепиться.
3.
Постоянный раздув "инфошоков"
 от уже наших правдолюбов лишь идет плюсиком для украинских ципсо-опонентов, потому что
их бойцы
, в отличие от наших,
сидят там в полной изоляции от систем массовой информации
. Некоторые боевики ВФУ после сдаче в плен говорят, что им перед выходом на задачу рассказывают, что
они будут сидеть не на ЛБС
, а на
третей

линии

фронта
, а
первая
 вообще где-то в районе н.п.
Новая Маячка
, до которой якобы уже
дошли В
Ф
У
. Поэтому они так бесстрашно и переходят Днепр, а потом сидят
 под ФАБами в Крынках
, из который пути назад нет.
Лодочки уезжают обратно
, увозя с собой только средней тяжести трехсотых,
поэтому спасающиеся бойцы выходят на наши позиции, где их принимают под белые рученьки.
Источник


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Колумбия не будет поставлять Украине советскую военную технику
«Ни одна единица российской техники, в каком бы состоянии она ни находилась на нашей территории, не будет использована в этом конфликте», — заявил президент Колумбии Густаво Петро
.

Было бы неплохо, если Колумбия не поставляла Зеленскому и его компании "колумбийские вкусняшки"
😏
Россия сейчас - подписаться


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
У бывших «оппозиционных» политиков и журналистов Украины - праздник. Появился новый шарик, в который можно вцепиться стертыми зубками - Арестович. Потому что уехал.
До этого главным раздражителем была я.
И вот уже порохоботы и бывшие «ватники» поучают: мол, не хватило смелости остаться в стране.
На самом деле, банально завидуют. Потому что им, в отличии от меня, не хватило смелости. Хватило жадности. Дело, как бы по-мещански, простите, не звучало,  - тупо в квартире в Киеве (жалко). Ну и еще бояться выйти из зоны комфорта.
Те, кто до 24 февраля кусал Зеленского, называя его наркоманом, дилетантом и т д.. уже полтора года как вынуждены прислуживать власти. Которую так ненавидят. Речь о всех - от клоуна Гончаренко до редакторов псевдоппозиционных изданий. Всем приходится договариваться с Офисом Президента. Наступая на горло амбициям, совести, эго.
Иначе - уголовное дело. В лучшем случае.
Поэтому такие как я или Арестович для приспособленцев - как белый свет для вампира.
Потому что сделали то, на что они не решались.
Свобода ГОВОРИТЬ - главное, что у меня есть. У них - нет.
Потому что  говорить правду об Украине сегодня можно только за ее пределами.
Я знаю, что такое уезжать из страны навсегда. Оставлять прошлую жизнь, имущество и т д. Сложно. Но еще сложнее - жить и врать себе и людям.
P.S. В следующем политическом цикле руководить Украиной будет тот, кто сейчас за ее пределами. (Не благодарите)


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Украинские источники подтверждают атаку на мост в Затоке, но ... утверждают, что он давно не используется.
Ага, конечно, "тупые русские ударили по неработающему мосту". Но подобный разгон темы говорит о том, что мост работать теперь точно не будет!!!


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Армия обороны Израиля за последние сутки провела точечную ликвидацию групп террористов в Иудеи и Самарии. Всего было уничтожено 17 боевиков, среди которых и командир группы - Саиб аль-Аул – активист "Исламского джихада" (иранские прокси). На фото - вот этот пузатый дядька. Со стороны армии Израиля потерь нет.
@yigal_levin


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Конфликт между президентом Зеленским и главкомом ВСУ Залужным, касательно тактики ведения боевых действий против РФ никуда не делся. Об этом свидетельствует публикация
Bild
, в которой немецкие журналисты подводят итоги первых двух недель контрнаступления ВСУ.
В частности, в издании отмечают, что само контрнаступление ВСУ продвигается "мучительно медленно": "освобождено восемь небольших сел и чуть более 120 квадратных километров земли, а "панического отступления русских не будет". При этом Украина платит "высокую цену за небольшие успехи", ежедневно теряя в наступательной операции погибшими и раненными около сотни человек.
"Киев при этом признает, что находится в "сложной" ситуации, поскольку русские переходят в наступление. Совершенно непонятно, почему Украина не развертывает большую часть своих лучших бригад, которые месяцами вооружались Западом и обучались, в том числе, в Германии?",
 — говорится в материале.
Впрочем, сам же Bild и отвечает на поставленный вопрос, указывая, что некоторые эксперты подозревают в "нерешительности" Украины политические разногласия. Известно, например, что президент Владимир Зеленский настаивает на подвижках на фронте, а начальник Генштаба Валерий Залужный предпочитает дождаться, когда в стране начнут действовать западные истребители (прежде всего американские F-16).
Немецкое издание подчеркивает, что "размолвка" между Зеленским и Залужным может окончиться своеобразным "компромиссом" между политическим и военным руководством страны, при котором Украина переходит в наступление. Правда, с ограниченными ресурсами и более тактическими целями.