[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Глава Нацсовета по ТВ Ольга Герасимьюк заявила о необходимости принятия мер против Telegram
"К моей радости, я уже услышала от наших депутатов мысли об этом. На прошлой неделе я слышала от определенных депутатов мысли о том, что нам нужно принимать серьезные меры. Другое дело, что законопроекты нужно продумать, но то, что с этим нужно разобраться, - это факт",
– считает Герасимьюк.
Такие заявления со стороны властей звучат не спроста. Из-за падающего рейтинга Зеленского, Банковой важно перекрыть все независимые источники информации, чтобы держать украинцев в "надувном пузыре", и тем самым исключить любое другое мнение, которое может навредить имиджу президента.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Пошкоджено обʼєкти енергетичної та промислової інфраструктури
, – Куртєв.
На щастя, ніхто з людей не постраждав.
Частина міста залишається без світла, відповідно є й проблеми з подачею опалення.
Аварійно-відновлювальні роботи тривають.
ТРУХА
⚡
Запорожье
 |
Прислать новость


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Водій, який
облаяв пасажира з інвалідністю
, звільнився за власним бажанням.
У КП «Міський тролейбус» нам повідомили, що чоловік відмовився надати пояснення власній поведінці. Шкода, ми б послухали
🤷♂
Хто забув, водій комунального автобуса №228 накричав на пасажира з інвалідністю та випхав його з салону. Коляска з
Юрієм Понькіним
 мало не впала на дорогу - на допомогу прийшли небайдужі містяни на зупинці.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Понад 11,5 мільярда гривень страхових виплат було профінансовано Фондом соціального страхування України у минулому році. Мова про допомоги і компенсації, які Фонд виплачував потерпілим внаслідок нещасних випадків на виробництві або професійних захворювань, а також членам їх родин.
📉
Фонд соціального страхування України здійснював страхові виплати для більше 166 тисяч потерпілих на виробництві та членів їх сімей. ФССУ фінансував для них щомісячні страхові виплати, які компенсують втрачений заробіток через набуту стійку непрацездатність, виплачував одноразові допомоги, надавав комплекс медико-соціальних послуг і опікувався їх рідними у разі смерті потерпілих.
✅
У структурі страхових виплат, здійснених за 2022 рік, основна частина припадає на:
- щомісячні страхові виплати – 11 238,3 млн грн, що становить 97,8% витрат на страхові виплати;
- одноразову допомогу – 138,2 млн грн (1,2%);
- допомогу по тимчасовій непрацездатності внаслідок нещасного випадку на виробництві – 119,8 млн грн (0,1%).


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Если сопоставить заявления
ГУР МО
 и
Генштаба ВСУ,
 то можно сделать следующие выводы.
1.
 Российская сторона не поставила украинскую сторону в известность о необходимости обеспечения безопасности в районе Белгорода в определённый период времени. Хотя ГУР подчёркивает, что
это неоднократно делалось в прошлом.
 За безопасность украинских пленных до момента обмена несёт российская сторона.
(ГУР)
2.
 Украина не была проинформирована про транспортные средства, маршруты и формы доставки военнопленных.
Украина не знала и не могла знать,
 каким маршрутом будут доставлены пленные.
(ГУР)
3.
 Посадка транспортного самолёта в 30-километровой зоне ведения боевых действий
в любом случае небезопасна и должна быть согласована,
 иначе это подвергает опасности весь процесс обмена и может быть расценена как спланированные и намеренные действия.
(ГУР)
4.
 ВСУ постоянно контролируют воздушное пространство, отслеживают точку запусков ракет и их снабжение, а за последнюю неделю - особенно тщательно, ведь противник нанёс 19 ракетных ударов по одной лишь Харьковской области, и многие из них - из района Белгорода. Естественно,
воздушные цели, которые осуществляют доставку вооружений, будут поражаться.
 Если ГУР не знал о маршруте Ил-76 и нахождении пленных на борту, то не мог знать и Генштаб.
(Генштаб)
5.
 ГУР к этому моменту
не может подтвердить,
 находились ли украинские военнопленные на борту Ил-76.
Итак, Россия не предупредила Украину, что Ил-76, который ранее
перевозил
 С-300, которые ежедневно запускают по Харькову, будет перевозить пленных. Ил-76 могли целенаправленно подставить под украинский огонь, как минимум, чтобы остановить процесс обмена пленными, как максимум, чтобы избавиться от ненужных России 65 украинских пленных.
Над Белгородом недаром действует
запрет на полёты гражданской авиации
 "до конца "СВО". Любой полёт в районе Белгорода - угроза для российской военной авиации.
Судьба украинских военнопленных остаётся неизвестной. Тела не были показаны (на кадрах, показанных российскими СМИ, было два тела). Хочется надеяться, что Ил-76 был пустым, но не хочется спекулировать. Страна, которая совершила
Еленовку
 могла совершить и Еленовку-2. Это всё, что можно сказать к этому моменту.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
❗
Журналист погиб в центре Донецка при обстреле со стороны ВСУ, еще один ранен — оперативные службы ДНР


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
☝
ПРЕТЕНЗІЇ НАРОДУ ДО ВЛАДИ…
…викладені у результатах національного соціологічного опитування.
🔺
Серед головних
 - корупція, недостатнє забезпечення ЗСУ та недоцільні витрати бюджету. За ними - проблеми, пов'язані з неналежною підготовкою до війни, приховування правди від громадян та слабкі кадрові рішення.
❗
Достатній набір для переобрання тих, хто прикриваючись війною продовжує грабувати країну і всупереч Конституції
подовжив
 собі термін перебування при владі.
🧰
 Матеріали по темі:
▪
Нелегітимні відсунули вибори
#соціологія
👉

Підписатися
 |
Поштова скринька


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
❗
Как назвать этих людей?
В столице Украины демонтировали памятник освободителю Киева генералу Ватутину


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Наш фюрер уволил посла в Великобритании Вадима Пристайко, который называл «нездоровым сарказмом» его слова о британском министре обороны Уоллесе.
Забавно, а ведь Пристайко был матёрым бандеровцем и был отличным спецом по кулуарным связям.
Получается, что у нашего фюрера самолюбие выше понимания, что настоящие специалисты это штучный товар и по объявлению их не найдёшь.
Вот же ж дурень. Он со своим болезненным самомнением весь наш Четвёртый Рейх так угробит...
@OpenUkraine


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Россия вернулась к погромам | Виталий Портников
@1inTVArmenia
@1inTVArmenia
https://youtu.be/YCDaJXjn0Gw


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Два десятки керівників дипломатичних місій країн-членів
🇪🇺
 Європейського Союзу, народні депутати України, лідери та представники угорської національної спільноти, пʼять локацій у двох громадах Берегівського району.
Цими днями Закарпаття – в центрі уваги всієї європейської спільноти.
Це безпрецедентна подія для нашого краю, яка показує, що Україна готова бути повноправним членам ЄС. Ми живемо, дотримуючись усіх демократичних принципів і стандартів, прагнемо до кращого й готові разом працювати, щоб отримати те, на що заслуговуємо, і те, за що поливають кров наші захисники.
Дякуємо Президенту Володимиру Зеленському, керівникам дипломатичних місій країн-членів Європейського Союзу, народним депутатам України за підтримку та увагу до Закарпаття, а також громадам, лідерам та представникам національних спільнот краю за консолідацію зусиль.
Разом ми – сила, разом ми переможемо!


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
❗
Міноборони активізує роботи із гуманітарного розмінування – перший заступник Міністра оборони Павлюк

Міністерство покращує якість та швидкість розмінування, оскільки «тільки на очищені території повернуться люди, бізнес, робота і нормальне життя» - про це розповів перший заступник Міністра оборони України Олександр Павлюк у
колонці
 для видання «Укрінформ».
За його даними, наразі додатково сформовано десять батальйонів та три роти розмінування
. Також затверджено План гуманітарного розмінування деокупованих територій на 2024 рік, в якому визначені території і послідовність робіт.
Олександр Павлюк є координатором Національного органу з питань протимінної діяльності.
Завданням інституції є координація заходів з гуманітарного розмінування на національному рівні.
Перший заступник Міністра повідомив, що від початку повномасштабного вторгнення групами розмінування уповноважених підрозділів
вже очищено від вибухонебезпечних предметів:
• 2610 квадратних кілометрів територій
• понад 68 квадратних кілометрів акваторій
• 8463 кілометрів автомобільних доріг
• 8 694 кілометрів ліній електропередач
• 3087 кілометрів залізничних колій
• 650 кілометрів трубопроводів
До заходів розмінування залучені п’ять операторів протимінної діяльності, ще десять проводять нетехнічне обстеження території. Разом це 216 груп та понад 1300 фахівців.
Для подальших робіт вже визначили та ідентифікували майже 26 тисяч гектарів територій, потенційно забруднених вибухонебезпечними предметами.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
⚡
Премʼєра! Четвертий випуск програми «Реальний фронт» на моєму каналі 1 квітня 2024 року о 19:00 за київським часом.
⏺
Теми випуску:
⏺
Теракт в «Крокус сіті хол»
⏺
Коли знищать Кримський міст
⏺
Що буде з Харковом?
⏺
Нова тактика окупантів
⏺
Хусити зрадили росіян
https://youtu.be/qse-HN2TkHY?si=sJUvvl3Qk1J4bL8M


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Мі мі мі
❤
Лиса голова заявляє, що ЗС РФ нанесли удар по позиціям ПВК «Вагнер». Вони зайшли до Ростова.
Готови вбивати всіх російських військових
💛
💙


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
В Кривом Роге предприимчивые предприниматели резко повысили цену на питьевую воду, после того как жители ринулись закупаться в супермаркетах.
Наказывать за это никого не будут.
Шептун
 |
Instagram
 |
Facebook


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
КЦС ВС вказав на обов'язок суду перевіряти електронну пошту та реєструвати надіслані на неї документи, підписані ЕЦП
Апеляційний суд залишив без руху апеляційну скаргу, оскільки вона подана поза межами строку на апеляційне оскарження без клопотання про його поновлення, і надав десятиденний строк на усунення недоліків.
Копія відповідної ухвали була направлена на електронну адресу, зазначену в апеляційній скарзі. Факт отримання копії ухвали підтверджений довідкою апеляційного суду та не заперечувався заявником.
У визначений строк апеляційний суд не отримав клопотання про поновлення строку, тому відмовив у відкритті апеляційного провадження у справі.
Верховний Суд у складі Касаційного цивільного суду скасував ухвалу, передав справу на розгляд до апеляційної інстанції, зробивши такі правові висновки.
Адвокат позивачки стверджувала, що в межах встановленого апеляційним судом строку направила на його офіційну електронну адресу клопотання про поновлення строку на апеляційне оскарження, на підтвердження цього вона надала скріншоти листування з апеляційним судом.
Із наданих скріншотів випливає, що адвокат із власної електронної адреси, на яку суд надіслав ухвалу про залишення апеляційної скарги без руху, направила на офіційну електронну адресу апеляційного суду підписане електронним підписом (файл із розширенням asice) клопотання про усунення недоліків апеляційної скарги.
Порядок використання для обміну документами електронної пошти встановлено Законом України «Про електронні документи та електронний документообіг», в якому зазначено, що порядок електронного документообігу визначається державними органами, органами місцевого самоврядування, підприємствами, установами та організаціями всіх форм власності згідно із законодавством.
За загальним правилом, визначеним ч. 1 ст. 11 цього Закону, електронний документ вважається одержаним адресатом із часу надходження авторові повідомлення в електронній формі від адресата про одержання цього електронного документа автора.
Відповідно до Положення про порядок використання ресурсів локальної обчислювальної мережі в Державній судовій адміністрації України, територіальних управліннях Державної судової адміністрації України, місцевих та апеляційних судах загальної юрисдикції, затвердженого наказом ДСА України від 4 грудня 2013 року № 164, користувач зобов'язаний перевіряти електронну поштову скриньку не менше двох разів на день. Також положення визначає порядок дій користувача після отримання нових повідомлень електронною поштою.
Крім того, у п. 22 Тимчасового порядку обміну офіційними електронними документами, затвердженого наказом ДСА України від 15 листопада 2016 року № 231, також встановлено порядок дій працівника суду в разі отримання електронного листа. Зокрема, електронну пошту відповідальна особа повинна перевіряти не рідше одного разу на годину протягом робочого дня.
Наведене свідчить про обов’язок працівників апарату суду перевіряти електронну пошту на наявність повідомлень та передавати їх для реєстрації.
Врахувавши відсутність відомостей про перевірку обставин і причин ненадходження чи нереєстрації в апеляційному суді клопотання заявника апеляційної скарги, а також відсутність даних перевірки змісту та порядку підписання електронним підписом самого клопотання, КЦС ВС вказав, що висновки про відмову у відкритті апеляційного провадження у зв'язку з неподанням заявником клопотання про поновлення строку на апеляційне оскарження слід визнати передчасними.
Постанова Верховного Суду від 7 грудня 2022 року у справі № 522/7002/17 (провадження № 61-10558св22) –
https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107803716
.
Із цією та іншими правовими позиціями ВС можна ознайомитися в Базі правових позицій ВС –
lpd.court.gov.ua/login
.
#Верховний_Суд

#КЦС_ВС

#судова_практика

#електронні_документи

#електронний_документообіг


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🇺🇦
 Не только россияне давят видео каналы для FPV. В каждую игру можно играть двоем.
Наши украинские парни собирают аналогичные решения буквально в полях из того, что под рукой.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Білорусь веде переговори з Іраном про виробництво шахедів на своїй території, — «Інститут вивчення війни» ISW
Вчора білоруський міністр оборони Хренін прибув до Ірану на зустріч зі своїм іранським колегою, щоб підписати Меморандум про взаєморозуміння та план двостороннього військового співробітництва на 2023 рік.
Міністр оборони Ірану Аштіані, перш за все, відповідає за ведення переговорів про військові придбання та продаж, а раніше вже зʼявлялись повідомлення, що Іран намагався перетворити одне з підприємств у Гомельській області білорусі на завод з виробництва іранських безпілотних апаратів.
Агент України


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Глава МИД Германии
посмела
 упрекнуть Украину в 30-летних кумовстве и коррупции.
Сразу после этого в украинских СМИ вспомнили, что в Европе и США тоже есть коррупция.
Ждем, когда на уровне МИД Украины заявят, что на Западе царят взяточничество и продажность.
Шептун
 |
Instagram
 |
Facebook