[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Новий огляд мапи DeepState від російського військового експерта, кухара путіна 2 розряду, спеціаліста по снарядному голоду та ректора музичної академії міноборони рф Євгєнія Пригожина.
Пригожин прогнозує, що невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму і день розпаду росії. Каже, що передумови цього вже створені.
*Відео взяли з каналу
ФД
.
@informnapalm


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Недавно 95 квартал жёстко поглумился над русскими баранами, которые притворяются украинцами. Про Скадовск там шуточки были дегенеративные. И что предлагают сделать русские бараны? Как обычно стать на колени и лизать украинскую туфлю, чтобы их простили. Украинцы же как негры, перед ними нужно бесконечно извиняться.
‼
 Мэр оккупированного Скадовска Яковлев прокомментировал номер "Квартала 95": Надеюсь, у режиссеров хватит сил извиниться
Так, глава города призвал режиссеров шоу извиниться перед людьми за шутки.
"Очень прав был Петлюра, который говорил: "Нам не так страшны московские вши, нам страшны украинские гниды". Шутки о "сеськах" из Скадовска, наверное, кому-то кажутся очень остроумными. Но пусть это будет на совести режиссеров. Надеюсь, у них хватит силы извиниться перед украинцами
Скадовск сегодня в оккупации, и действительно чего сейчас нуждаются скадовчане в поддержке. Знаю, что у нас много людей были русскоязычными, но все хорошо понимают украинский, и хорошо говорят по-украински", -
отметил мэр
 .
Яковлев также объявил флешмоб "Скадовск говорит по-украински". Он предложил всем жителям Скадовска зачитать что-нибудь на украинском.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🤩
Тим часом йде евакуація Бєлгородського автовокзалу - він оточений з невідомих простій русні причин
Повідомляють ще про «підозрілий пакет» на парковці біля ресторану поруч. Територію там оточили поліція та тероборона.
🇺🇦
Новини України | Підпишись


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
В Україні найближчим часом мають намір посилити відповідальність за ухилення від мобілізації та інші військові правопорушення.
Про це свідчить опублікований на сайті Верховної Ради законопроект №10379.
Зокрема Кабмін пропонує збільшити штрафи за військові правопорушення:
▪
за порушення призовниками, військовозобов'язаними та резервістами правил військового обліку - штраф від 8 500 до 17 000 грн;

▪
за порушення законодавства про оборону, військовий обов'язок і військову службу, мобілізаційну підготовку та мобілізацію - штраф від 25 500 до 34 000 грн для громадян і від 34 000 до 85 000 грн для посадовців;

▪
за порушення цього законодавства під час воєнного стану штраф становитиме від 34 000 до 51 000 грн для громадян і від 153 000 до 204 000 грн для посадовців.
✅
підписуйся на Ukraine NOW


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Расчёты 122-мм САУ 2С1 "Гвоздика" 132-й бригады 1-го АК 8-й армии ЮВО ВС России точным огнем, корректируемым БЛА, уничтожают украинских нацистов западнее Горловки.
@polk105


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Апартаменти
 триповерхова келія Паші Лєбєдя, розташована на території Києво-Печерської лаври.
Нічого зайвого: сауна - для омовєнія ног, винний погреб - для причастя, тренажерка - для укреплєнія плоті і духа.
Скромна, богоугодна.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
⚡
Китай надеется, что пакетное соглашение о транспортировке зерна по Чёрному морю будет и далее осуществляться всеобъемлющим образом — МИД КНР


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
До сьогоднішнього дня Джо Байден був у Києві понад 8 років тому. Та попри очевидні ризики, президент США та лідер демократичного світу приїжджає у вільну країну вільних людей, котрі ціною величезних втрат захищають свободу.
Приїжджає, щоб показати — союз України  і США міцний і незламний. Що Сполучені Штати можуть і будуть підтримувати українців до повної перемоги.
Буря, що здійнялася на московських болотах після візиту, підтверджує, що сигнал вони отримали і зрозуміли правильно — про жодні компроміси чи розмови про Україну без України не може бути мови. Новий пакет військової допомоги від США на майже 500 мільйонів, який анонсував Байден, став практичним свідченням серйозності намірів.
Дякуємо за підтримку!
#StayStrongWithUkraine


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
⚡
После освобождения Соледара откроются благоприятные перспективы для освобождения Артемовска
 — Пушилин


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Российское руководство сделало террор инструментом внешней и внутренней политики.
Начиная с 1994-го года РФ воюет с представителями исламского мира. Если брать советский период, то с 1979-го (с ввода войск в Афганистан).
В российских СМИ потерялись сообщения о ещё относительно недавней войне с Исламским Государством в Сирии. Медали за бомбардировки сирийцев розданы, герои назначены, а перманентные перестрелки на Северном Кавказе с регулярной гибелью российских военнослужащих не высвечиваются в СМИ.
Но это не означает, что нет у Кремля недоброжелателей.
Один теракт в Москве высветил все пороки и болезни российского государства и вырожденческий инфантилизм российского общества в целом.
Неспособность российского руководства быстро реагировать на новую угрозу, системное воровство, зависимость общества от нарративов СМИ, где во всём виновны украинцы, с одновременными требованиями от нас сочувствий, а также лояльное отношение к пыткам, ставшими нормой, которые применяются к подозреваемым уже практически в прямом эфире – это массовый психоз, ставший нормой.
Системно продуцируя ненависть и смерть, рано или поздно они приходят к самим авторам.
Кремль устраивает системный террор в Сирии и в Украине, убивая тысячи мирных граждан в пыточных, обстреливая снарядами и ракетами города, но при этом обвиняет всех вокруг в случившемся в Москве.
Гибель беззащитных гражданских, а особенно детей – это всегда ужасная трагедия, но российским гражданам, требующих большого сочувствия, стоит посмотреть правде в глаза и понять, что мировым рекордсменом по убийству ни в чем не повинных гражданских, включая маленьких детей, является их собственная страна.
Что-то мы не слышали сочувствия о терроре в Буче, Изюме, Мариуполе, Херсоне, когда россияне пытали у убивали людей тысячами, рассказывая по своим телеканалам про «инсценировки» и «зверства Азова».
Реальность приходит вне зависимости от заговаривания её словами, и новый фактор в виде мести ИГ может быть таким же системным, как и российский террор.
👉

Полное видео.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Ну, что, расеянцы, повоевали с Украиной?
А если бы учили историю, а не рефлексировали на конспирологические бредни, то знали бы, что каждая проигрышная война для московского царства, российской империи, ссср и теперь уже российской федерации, заканчивается внутренней хаотизацией.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
❗
ВСУ обстреляли гражданскую инфраструктуру Новой Каховки
В 22:55 украинские боевики выпустили по Новой Каховке 15 снарядов ствольной артиллерии, сообщили в экстренных службах.
Информация о жертвах и разрушениях уточняется.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Підари намагалися прорватися
 до населеного пункту Уманське, авдіївський напрямок.
Маємо ліквідований особовий склад та знищену техніку противника.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Руслан Стрілець: Після 10 років зволікань, Україна нарешті приєднується до Мінаматської конвенції про ртуть
⚡
 Верховна Рада прийняла законопроєкт №0199 “Про приєднання України до Мінаматської конвенції про ртуть” за основу та в цілому як закон.
💬

“Законопроєкт був поданий до парламенту Президентом України Володимиром Зеленським, адже значення цього документа важко переоцінити і в геополітичній, і в економічній та довкіллєвій сферах. Це той міжнародний документ, до якого долучилася 141 держава світу, і який так ігнорує росія. Маючи чітку політичну волю та позицію, ми сьогодні встановлюємо в своїй країні міжнародно визнані правила поводження з цим рідким отруйним металом”,

- наголосив Міністр Руслан Стрілець.
За його словами, долучення України до Конвенції дозволить в подальшому унеможливити такі ситуації, як із заводом “Радикал”, коли сотні тонн ртуті опинилися просто неба в українській столиці. Крім того, Україна зможе за допомогою міжнародних партнерів вирішити це питання. Аналогічно, як і розв'язати проблеми зі всією “радянською спадщиною” - залишками ртуті на недіючих пострадянських підприємствах, що використовували застарілі технології.
Як сторона Конвенції, Україна матиме доступ до цільових ресурсів Глобального екологічного фонду, а також зможе отримати технічну та експертну допомогу.
💬

“Сьогоднішнє рішення українського парламенту вкотре демонструє, що попри війну Україна продовжує слідувати Європейським зеленим курсом та дбає про своїх людей та власне довкілля. Ми крок за кроком зменшуємо дистанцію між нами та ЄС і з кожним рішенням збільшуємо прірву з агресивним сусідом.  Бо наш шлях - це шлях прогресивних дій та якісних змін в країні”,
 -
наголосив Руслан Стрілець.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🗳
Первый день досрочного голосования на выборах президента Российской Федерации стартовал в Куйбышевском районе. Жители активно принимают участие в выборах и реализуют свое избирательное право.
#ЕРДНР

#ЕР80

#ВыборыПрезидента2024

#ЯсделалСвойВыбор

#ИдуНаВыборы

#Куйбышевский


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Армия обороны Израиля внимательно следит за ситуацией в Иране, готовясь к отражению угроз в координации с США, заявил начальник генштаба ЦАХАЛ
Тегеран передал Вашингтону сообщение, что при вмешательстве США в конфликт между Израилем и Ираном американские силы в регионе будут атакованы.
@polk105


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Трагедия в трёх актах:
1.
Украинские беженцы хотели забросить дерьмо в почтовые ящики к русскоговорящим в Берлине.
2. Украинцы случайно перепутали адреса и закинули дерьмо в ящики коренных жителей Берлина.
3. Их задержала полиция.
Конец.
😍

|Z| MEMES
 |
РЕЗЕРВ


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Дай.
https://peremogi.livejournal.com/69963699.html
#все сразу достали кошельки

#украинство - это

#картинка

#крутить наждак


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Сцуко!!! Кращій стьоб над руснявою ескортницею від американського військового. )))
PS  От це кончене русняве провмовляння англійських слів - дратує.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
👉
Всеволод Князєв визнаний за протоколом НАЗК винним у вчиненні правопорушення, пов'язаного з корупцією, та може бути позбавлений посади судді
Київський апеляційний суд сьогодні відмовив у задоволенні апеляційної скарги колишнього голови Верховного Суду Всеволода Князєва на рішення Печерського районного суду міста Києва, яким його було визнано винним у порушенні обмежень щодо одержання подарунків.
Нагадаємо, три місяці тому Голова НАЗК склав стосовно ексочільника Верховного Суду протокол про адміністративне правопорушення за ч. 1 ст. 172-5 КУпАП.  Порушуючи передбачену ч. 2 ст. 23 Закону України «Про запобігання корупції» заборону, Всеволод Князєв отримав подарунок у вигляді оренди квартири у Печерському районі Києва (м/р Липки) площею 133 кв. м. за ціною, суттєво нижчою від ринкової. Суддя кілька років щомісяця платив за оренду цієї квартири лише по тисячі гривень. Різниця у фактичній та ринковій вартості оренди і є незаконним подарунком.
На Всеволода Князєва накладено адміністративне стягнення у вигляді штрафу в розмірі 2550 грн., а також конфіскації подарунку в розмірі 906,6 тис. грн. Кошти будуть стягнені в дохід держави. Оскільки Князєва визнали винним у вчиненні правопорушення, пов'язаного з корупцією, відомості про нього будуть внесені до
Реєстру порушників
.
Також встановлені судом обставини є підставою для звільнення Князєва з посади судді. Для ініціювання відповідного дисциплінарного провадження НАЗК звернеться зі скаргою до Вищої ради правосуддя.
Рішення апеляційного суду остаточне і оскарженню не підлягає.
🔗
Детальніше