[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Кадры из Харьковской области, приграничный с Белгородской областью район
Наши солдаты нанесли поражение артиллерией по позициям личного состава ВСУ по целеуказанию разведчиков.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Як мало ми сьогодні можемо сказати! Як мало висловити навіть припущень! Як недалеко в цьому ми пішли від совка! Як мало істини будуть знати про ці події наші нащадки!
А потім у нас в минулому одні герої! А на що ті герої перетворювали життя звичайних людей, скільки життів обірвали - ніхто вже не знає і знати не хоче.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
⚡
 Основные заявления врио Главы ДНР Дениса Пушилина в эфире программы «Время покажет» на Первом канале:
▪
Боевые действия ведутся в районе Парасковиевки, взятие этого села позволит перерезать последний путь снабжения украинских войск в Артёмовске (Бахмуте);
▪
Перспектив оставления украинскими войсками Артемовска (Бахмута) пока нет;
▪
Боевые действия развернулись в юго-восточной части Угледара, есть успехи.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Официальная сводка Представительства ДНР в СЦКК с 00:00 30.12.2023 по 00:00 31.12.2023 года
❗
За истекшие сутки Представительством зафиксировано 53 факта ведения огня со стороны ВФУ.
🆘
 Поступили сведения о гибели двух гражданских лиц
 в
Петровском
 районе Донецка.
🚑
Ранения различной степени тяжести получили 7 гражданских лиц
в
Петровском
 районе Донецка.
🚑
 Кроме того, в
Кировском
 районе Донецка
ранены трое сотрудников бригады СМП.
🏚
Повреждены 8 жилых домостроений
 в
Куйбышевском
 районе Донецка,
Никитовском
 районе Горловки,
Советском
 районе Макеевки, а также
4 объекта
 гражданской
инфраструктуры
.
Под вражеским огнем оказались районы четырех населенных пунктов Республики:
 Горловка (Никитовский район), Ясиноватский район, столица г. Донецк (Киевский, Куйбышевский, Кировский, Петровский районы), Макеевка (Советский район).
На донецком направлении противник совершил 31 обстрел из артиллерии 155 мм, ударного БпЛА.
На горловском 19 обстрелов из артиллерии 152, 122 и 155 мм, в т.ч. с кассетной боевой частью.
На ясиноватском 3 обстрела из артиллерии 155 мм.
Выпущена 181 единица различных боеприпасов.
В
предыдущие
 сутки со стороны ВФУ зафиксирован 81 обстрел.
@online_dnr_sckk


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Власне оборонне виробництво - це важливий крок на шляху до перемоги України.
Про це розповів під час участі у панельній дискусії на першому Міжнародному форумі оборонних індустрій у Києві.
Посилення оборонних спроможностей нашої держави передбачається проектом Української доктрини, що був запропонований до загальнонаціонального обговорення Президентом Володимиром Зеленським у День Конституції.
Також президенти України та США під час візиту Володимира Зеленського до Сполучених Штатів, домовились про локалізацію оборонного виробництва в Україні.
Найближчим часом розпочнуться зустрічі спеціалістів з обох сторін, щоб визначити дорожню карту співпраці.
Паралельно триває робота над новою структурою світової безпеки.
Власне потужне оборонне виробництво дозволить не лише забезпечити українську армію необхідним озброєнням, а й поверне нашій державі місце в світі за науковим та виробничим потенціалом.
Відзначив велику кількість провідних фахівців та представників компаній сфери безпеки та оборони, які взяли участь в першому форумі оборонних індустрій в Києві.
Продовжуємо роботу.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Украина подходит к знаковой битве для своей новейшей истории, – председатель ГУР Буданов.
▪
Когда она начнется, тайна. Но все понимают: мы к этому приближаемся.
▪
Достаточные объемы территории будут возвращены силовым путем во время этой контр-операции. На каких направлениях, что именно и как – секрет.
▪
Выйти на границы 1991 года – достижимое задание 2023 года.
ТРУХА
⚡
Украина | Прислать новость


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Увага!
Важное объявление. Если сегодня Великий Князь Киевский не наденет таки нарядную вишиванку - отменяем нахрен праздник.
Пока ждем.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
⚠
 росіяни кажуть, ніби Німеччина «відхрестилась» від своїх Leopard. Це – фейк
Брехня:
міністерка закордонних справ Німеччини Бербок попросила не називати танки Leopard німецькими.
💬
 Зовсім не має значення, де що зроблено. Ви ж не говорите про свій айфон, що він американський чи Тіма Кука. Ви говорите, що він ваш. Така сама історія і з танками… Німецькі в Німеччині, а це – українські. І що вони з ними роблять, це нас не стосується
, – «цитують» Бербок російські ЗМІ.
Правда
: цю фразу вигадали пропагандисти, жодного прохання про комунікацію щодо Leopard у відкритих джерелах немає.
Немає жодної подібної заяви й на сайті МЗС Німеччини. Бербок говорила про те, що настав час для важливих рішень у зовнішній політиці ЄС, але про Leopard – жодного слова.
Вигадану заяву міністерки про танки поширюють лише проросійські акаунти в соцмережах, які регулярно публікують фейки про війну.
👆

Telegram
 |
Сайт
 |
Instagram
 |
Twitter
 |
Facebook
 |
Viber


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Интересно, что данная статья освещает те проблемы, о которых мы в свое время кричали из-за каждого угла.
Если бы хоть кто-то углубился в историю и запрет Партии Шария - то он бы точно знал, что после начала войны СБУ получили огромное количество информации о реальном влиянии России внутри Украины: какие партии спонсировались РФ, какие политиков. И что самое смешное
никто из правоохранительных органов не нашел информации о том, что Партия Шария когда-либо имела отношения с Россией
Именно поэтому до сих пор СБУ не может ни в деле о запрете партии, ни в деле о санкциях предоставить хоть какое-то внятное объяснение преследованиям. У них нет доказательств связей с Россией. Есть аргументация в стиле:
«они оскорбили прокуроров»
Признать лишь надо то, что все эти запреты и атаки на партию начались и продолжались именно с этой печальной истории о
немногочисленном, но агрессивном
 неонацизме в Украине. В более менее спокойные времена после Порошенко и начала Зеленского все, безусловно, ожидали, что агрессивная украинизация отойдет на второй план. Общество нуждалось в свободе слова, свободе собраний и свободе мнения.
Братство, Нацкорпус, С14 - были маргинализированные малочисленные группировки, которые всем в свое время надоели, но их не могли поставить на место. Они бегали с места на места, как обезьяна с гранатой, и всех утомляли.
Именно Партия Шария начала делать акцент на том, что таких группировок очень мало, но их агрессивность должна наказываться и контролироваться законом. Это все, что мы требовали. Даже если на тысячу адекватных людей приходится один шимпанзе - он утомляет.
Теперь эти упоротые группировки любят говорить, что мы звали Россию. Но хочу обратить внимание - мы никогда не просили Россию помочь с этим вопросом. Мы обращались к президенту Украины, мы обращались в европейские и международные организации - мы получили десятки реакций европейских парламентариев, ООН и ОБСЕ. Перед войной ООН выпустили огромный доклад о постоянном нарушении прав человек этими радикальными группировками.
Проблема в том, что если бы власть в свое время обратила и пресекла деятельность этого агрессивного меньшинства - мы бы никогда не получили риторику России о том, что ВСЯ Украина нацистская. Ведь на самом деле ты не можешь быть виноват в том, что борешься за гражданское общество в своей стране.
Виноваты те кто:
а) не давал возможности миллионам украинцев говорить и думать, что они хотят
б) те, кто передавал российской власти информацию о том, что вся Украина якобы неонацистская
Поэтому статья выше лишь подтверждает, что проблема неонацизма была, а теперь будет и будет сильнее. Потому что уже абсолютно нормально обсуждать, что азовцы попадают в Вальхаллу, а мои товарищи мне всерьез доказывают, что свастика - это символ солнца.
И, конечно, вина в этом - России. Именно Россия ответственность за деятельность нескольких маргинализированных группировок возложила на всю нашу страну - разрушила дома тех, кто говорил на русском языке, жил и живет в Восточной Украине, любил и уважал Россию.
Россия гиперболизировала проблему и создала катастрофу, потому что теперь миллионам украинцев на фоне разрушенных жизней и разрушенных домов нацистские символы и нацистские преступления кажутся чем-то далеким и страшным.
Им кажется, что теперь им плевать на свастику, когда перед ним убийца. Но суть не в этом.
С последствиями этой проблемы украинское общество столкнется позже, когда война или закончится или перейдет в затяжную фазу. Рано или поздно общество и человек захотят
говорить
. Но такие группировки, привыкшие к языку силу, теперь монополизируют полностью право на мнение, власть и слово.
Ну, если криволапый мишка вошел в комнату - кто ж виноват.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
1. Стратегия
аннигиляции,
 это ужасно романтично, конечно.
Только я не понимаю, зачем ее приписывать немецкому влиянию, если российское военное руководство вполне самостоятельно наследует наработки собственного, чрезвычайно богатого опыта?..
2. Вы совершенно справедливо указываете на то, что наше военное руководство поймано в ловушку политической «целесообразности»: от ГК до командира роты.
Вместо того, чтобы вести оборону по естественным рубежам, с проведением локальных контрнаступлений с конкретными целями, у нас господствует приказ «ни пяди нашей земли».
И последствия будут именно такие, как Вы указали.
Но, давайте заметим - бессмысленные неорганизованные контратаки - привелегия не только ВСУ.)
Навидались мы и с российской стороны того же - и именно этот признак пахнет той самой «советской школой», общей на двоих.
Вопрос - кто быстрее учится и делает выводы, зависит, в большей мере от самой слабой (и ключевой!) точки военной стратегии:
- преобразования политических задач в военные и наоборот.
Здесь РФ более эффективна.
И шагнула дальше, чем во времена позднего СССР.
А вот мы взяли от этой модели ее худшие черты, а не лучшие.
Когда генералы боятся навязывать свое мнение/прояснения политическому руководству.
3. Теперь, что касается предыдущих замечаний.
Артбригада и артбригада в составе общевойсковой армии – это очень разные артбригады.
Артбригада не самоцель.
Тем более, что артгруппа, всесторонне обеспеченная всеми видами боевого обеспечения, начиная с беспилотной разведки и целеуказания, вполне себе опробовалась ВС РФ в составе 150-й дивизии еще во времена раннего Донбасса.
Самоцель - соединения и объединения постоянного состава, со своей логистикой, постоянной системой управления, и – берем выше – своими традициями, достижениями, историей, все то, что составляет «esprit de corps».
Который, как известно, имеет накопительный эффект и раньше или позднее приводит к качественному скачку в соединении.
Что касается создания армейских корпусов и кому чего не разрешили, то я принимал непосредственное участие во всех этих процессах, в том числе, и в процессах реорганизации на довоенном этапе, и очень хорошо знаю, кому что разрешили, а кому – нет.
Ничего советского на довоенном этапе мы не строили, наоборот, уничтожали и резали под «стандарты НАТО».
Залужный кое-что успел сделать перед войной, но болезнь зашла так далеко, что уже не успевали.
И во время войны тоже.
Так вот ответ: «он хотел, а ему не дали» буквален.
4. Что касается «советского».
Я бы так этим словом не пренебрегал.)
Ничего не может вырасти из ничего, и тезис: «российское военное руководство черпает вдохновение для своих уникальных решений в немецкой доктрине первой мировой», минуя 70-ти летний опыт советской военной школы, из которой оно выросло, логически несостоятелен.)
И не копирование советского нужно, а творческая переработка, о которой я и писал.
Эта переработка у российской стороны получается лучше на данном этапе.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Центральная военно-врачебная комиссия занималась предоставлением справок уклонистам за взятки
В "системной коррупции" уличен замначальника ЦВКК Минобороны. Чиновник за разные суммы предлагал мужчинам уклониться от срочной службы в условиях военного времени.
За 5 тысяч долларов выдавалась справка в признании призывника непригодным к службе по состоянию здоровья с последующим снятием с военного учета.
Сначала СБУ задокументировала передачу первого транша взятки в 2,5 тысячи долларов, а затем поймала чиновника "на горячем" во время передачи в его кабинете второй половины взятки.
В ходе обысков нашли наличные, общей стоимостью 5 миллионов гривен разной валютой.
Ему грозит до 10 лет с конфискацией имущества, решается вопрос меры пресечения в виде содержания под стражей.
WTF: подтверждаем свой статус одной из самых коррумпированных стран мира
🫠


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
В 1944 году командир 49-й гвардейской стрелковой дивизии 28-й армии 3-го Украинского фронта Василий Филиппович Маргелов освобождал Херсон.
Сегодня в тех же местах бьётся добровольческий отряд N 33 имени В. Маргелова Минобороны России. У каждого из парней своя уникальная история, а нам выпал редкий шанс с ними познакомиться.
Полный репортаж ищите в Telegram-канале
@ivanpolyanzkiy
.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
США предупреждали РФ, что конкретно «Крокус Сити Холл» может стать целью теракта.
Об этом сообщили сразу два ведущих издания - The New York Times и Washington Post со ссылкой на источники.
NYT пишет, что
Штаты поделились информацией за более чем 2 недели до стрельбы - и за сутки до того, как опубликовали официальное предупреждение на сайте посольства.
Однако в предупреждении содержалось неточное время - п
редполагалось, что теракт может произойти в течение нескольких дней. NYT напоминает, что в публичном предупреждении посольства США от 7 марта говорилось о возможных террористических атаках "в ближайшие два дня".
 Но теракта в указанные временные рамки не произошло, что, возможно ослабило бдительность РФ.
Washington Post пишет, что РФ
, по крайней мере, на начальном этапе, серьезно отнеслось к предупреждению США.
По данным газеты, предупреждение о "Крокусе" включало также информацию о планах "ИГ" напасть на синагогу. На следующий день ФСБ объявила, что предотвратила нападение боевиков на синагогу в Москве.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
📹
Армейский спецназ навёл РСЗО 114 бригады на противника
Производя наблюдение за позициями противника на линии боевого соприкосновения, подразделение Армейского спецназа ВС РФ обнаружило скопление живой силы ВСУ и приняло решение навести на них артиллерию. По переданным координатам отработал  расчёт РСЗО 114 бригады 1 Донецкого армейского корпуса, уничтожив врага.
Подписывайтесь
 на телеграмм канал Народная милиция ДНР, чтобы увидеть войну нашими глазами.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
The New York Times
дает
 неоднозначную оценку контрнаступлению ВСУ — в издании сообщают, что достижения Украины незначительны, а основная линия фронта российских войск не прорвана.
"Украинские приобретения касаются крошечных деревень, и до сих пор не было никаких признаков серьезного прорыва в густой сети обороны сил РФ",
 — говорится в материале NYT. Причем, в издании проанализировала видео из сел, куда вошли ВСУ, придя к выводу, что "неясно, какой именно контроль установили украинские военные" — на нескольких видео на заднем плане слышны взрывы и стрельба из стрелкового оружия.
Западные военные аналитики также отмечают, что потребуются недели или месяцы, чтобы оценить успех атак ВСУ. К тому же, хотя Украина не сообщает о потерях, "атаки на российские траншеи, бункеры, минные поля и огневые точки, вероятно, нанесут тяжелый урон украинским силам", говорят аналитики.
"Есть некоторые подтвержденные потери как в войсках, так и в передовом вооружении, недавно переданном Украине союзниками",
 — подчеркивают в The New York Times.
Как видим, контрнаступление Украины не задалось и западные СМИ очень аккуратно подводят свою аудиторию к данному факту. Всего за неделю у ВСУ "сточено" 10-15% готовившихся более полугода резервов и довольно ощутимо потрепаны самые боеспособные части. При этом военные категорически против спешки (Залужный, по инсайдерской информации, вообще предлагал отложить все до осени), но Зеленский требует оперативных результатов, поскольку на Офис президента "давят" западные спонсоры.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🍓
 Судячи по відгукам по засіданню Комітету по БЕБ ми все ж таки сьогодні трошки порно змогли де-факто легалізувати)))


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Скандал в Київський психлікарні ім. Павлова.
Незалежна комісія встановила, що на всіх тестах Роршаха — Порошенко.
Хто робив закупівлю з'ясовується.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
❗
Reuters
 со ссылкой на министра экономики и торговли Юлии Свириденко сообщает, что ВВП Украины по итогам февраля упал всего на 26%. Министр рада таким показателям, так как в январе ВВП страны завалился аж на 32%.  Свириденко считает, что правительству удалось «выиграть энергетическую войну с Россией и наблюдается появление оптимизма у нашего бизнеса».
Из уст министерки да мед бы пить!


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Поки вчора українці раділи переліку нового сучасного озброєння, яке анонсували доправити в Україну наші союзники, а сьогодні очікуються нові позитивні новини з "Рамштайну", то на російських пабліках  вчора виходили дописи про озброєння, яким воює "друга армія світу" і яке російське міністерство (оборони) нападу передає незаконним (навіть по законодавству рф) збройним формуванням - "приватної армії" Пригожина.
Намагаючись хоч якось підбадьорити читачів, російський канал "Военный Осведомитель" пише: "
...Обратите внимание на проводимые расчётом мероприятия по маскировке орудия и его огневой позиции
".
"Маскувальними заходами" вони називають натягнення сітки на гаубицю Д-1 після пострілу, що на їх думку вже є вершиною майстерності артилеристів-ОРКестрантів "Вагнера".
Цікаво, що, до прикладу,
в Сирії, найманцям "Вагнера" довіряли більш "сучасну" зброю
 70-80-х років,  наприклад  2С1, хоча тоді в складі цього бандформування було значно менше зеків.
@informnapalm