[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Сьогодні свободою та гідністю ми завдячуємо українським військовим.
Саме їхній щоденний подвиг дає нам можливість повноцінно жити навіть серед жахів цієї війни, відновлювати зруйновані ворогом будинки, інфраструктуру, радіти святам, облаштовувати різдвяні ялинки в метро та дбати про фронт й один про одного. І так - навіть висаджувати навесні квіти.
Бо в чому, як не у вірності собі, своїм переконанням і традиціям незалежно від зовнішніх обставин, полягає сенс життя і невпинної боротьби за нього?
З Днем нашої гідності і свободи!


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🇺🇦
 Просування ЗСУ:
Бердянський напрямок — 1 300 м.
В напрямку Кліщіївки — 1 200 м.
В напрямку Курдюмівки  — 1 500 м.
✅
@totalzrada


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Відремонтувати 3 школи за 700 млн гривень біля кордону з терористами — це логічно
🤣
Терористи з рашки можуть ракетами вдарити по Львову, а ось біля кордону за 20 км не знищать нічого…
Печальний досвід Сумщини де авіаційними бомбами знищили повністю два села нічого не навчив…


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Через вибух на АЗК тимчасово обмежено рух на вулиці Полтавський шлях від вулиці Євгена Котляра до вулиці Рильєва.
Патрульні одними з перших прибули на місце. Спільно з іншими службами поліцейські надають допомогу потерпілим на місцях, забезпечують безперешкодний проїзд медиків та рятувальників, здійснюють охорону місця подій.
Обмеження триватимуть до завершення роботи екстрених служб.
У випадку необхідності, негайно телефонуйте на лінію 102.

Надіслати новину
@Kharkiv_Lifebot
👉
 ПІДПИСАТИСЯ


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Рубріка - "Подорожчання з 4 до 6  було помітно, а з 6 до 79 - непомітно".
Ще цим прикладом можна ілюструвати кінець епохи бідності та як Порошенко наживався на цибулі в борщовому наборі.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
«Ленд-ліз» від рашистів знайшли у Харківській області.
У Токарівці окупанти залишили по собі схованку з понад сотнею артилерійських снарядів калібру 122 мм.
Тепер вони полетять туди, звідки й приїхали
😁
Труха
⚡
Харьков
 |
Прислать новость


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🤦♂
«19 января вода в прорубях ГРЕХИ СМЫВАТЬ НЕ БУДЕТ! Купайтесь на свой страх и риск»!»
Понимая, что православные будут праздновать Крещение сегодня, а не 6 января как сказал Зеленский, в Пустых Церквях Украины пытались отговорить от окунания в проруби.
Позже покажем, что из этого получилось.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
F-16 є провісником перемоги. Коли і як західні винищувачі змінять конфігурації війни
Варто розраховувати, що вже вересень-жовтень стануть вирішальними, коли кремль не зможе навіть вдавати оптимізм щодо своєї «воєнної операції». Усі ключові меседжі з цього приводу очікувано прозвучать на G7 за участю Володимира Зеленського.
🫵🏼
 Винищувачі 4-го покоління (навіть не кажучи про 5-те) сьогодні такі ж всесильні, як бог Зевс у грецькій міфології: він контролював стихії та керував небесними силами. F-16 може ще більше.
👉🏼
 F-16 — багатоцільовий винищувач, бере на борт 5-8 тонн «гостинців» - бомб та ракет. Здатен підтримувати сухопутні частини у наступі, використовуючи керовані та некеровані авіабомби, ракети, реактивні снаряди. F-16 - це 4 в 1: перехоплювач, винищувач, бомбардувальник і штурмовик.
👉🏼
 F-16 також працює як платформа для ракет протиракетної та протиповітряної оборони, тобто здатен перетворюватися на літаючий HIMARS чи Iris-T. До дальності ракет додається бойовий радіус самого винищувача: він може залітати на 1000 км у тил ворога.
👉🏼
 Сучасна авіація – якось мірою є зброєю масового знищення, адже 5-8 тонн бойового навантаження здатне знищити будь-який укріпрайон. В еквіваленті, це щонайменше 250 ракет HIMARS (якщо рахувати по бойовому елементу). Спершу авіація протягом тижня-двох протирадарними ракетами вибиває ППО окупантів, а потім починаються ракетні обстріли та бомбардування.
👉🏼
 2-3 ескадрильї F-16 здатні зломити хребет рашистській обороні. Як кажуть військові, хто контролює небо, той контролює війну.
🫵🏼
 Напередодні G7 було зрозуміло, що Україна отримає  F-16. Питання, скільки, коли й від кого.
👉🏼
 "Скільки" і "від кого" - це прості запитання. Є три потенційних донори, які переходять на  F-35: це Данія, Бельгія та Нідерланди. Загалом трійця виводить із експлуатації 139 винищувачів. Якщо ж говорити про цей рік, то йдеться про одну-дві ескадрильї від Нідерландів та одну від Данії, тобто загалом від 24 до 36 машин, -
Defense Exprese.
До речі, нові (а не вживанні) борти не лише коштуватимуть в рази дорожче, але тут вступає такий фактор як час: черга за ними розписана на десятиріччя вперед.
👉🏼
 ЗСУ важливо не лише отримати сам літак, але й озброєння. Без них F-16 - це лише літаюча платформа.  БК та запчастини складають 50% загального чека машини, і тут, очевидно, мали б сказати слово наші американські партнери.
🫵🏼
 Літаки потраплять в Україну, коли завершиться підготовка пілотів. Орієнтовно, це вересень-жовтень. Саме 3-4 місяці потрібно на навчання льотчиків 1-2 класу.  Сподіваємося, саме тоді Зевс, верховний бог 4-го покоління, промчить на своїй вогняній колісниці ватними оборонними шеренгами окупантів, і в них геть зовсім вигорить віра у "царя і атечество".
Підписуйтеся на
"Орестократію".


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Триває потужна хвиля успішної приватизації
👍
✅
 Єдиний майновий комплекс ДП «ТВК», розташований біля відомого одеського ринку «7-й кілометр», сьогодні «пішов з молотка» за 106,2 млн грн.
✔
 Також новий покупець сплатить до державного бюджету ПДВ у сумі 21,2 млн грн та виплатить 12,2 млн грн поточної заборгованості.
☝
 Це кошти, які потрібні країні тут і зараз, для підтримки Сил оборони. Також це інвестиція, яка трансформує державний «пасив» у приватний «актив» і стане ще одною точкою росту для Одеського регіону.

👉
 До майнового комплексу входить 39 одиниць нерухомого майна, зі всією необхідною інфраструктурою та комунікаціями для швидкого старту роботи. Площа будівель та споруд перевищує 35 тис. кв м.
ℹ
 Запрошую бізнес брати участь в наших приватизаційних аукціонах! Більше – на сайті
https://privatization.gov.ua


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Сотрудники СК России по Херсонской области оказывают помощь медицинским учреждениям региона
"В настоящее время осуществляется сборка необходимой мебели для палат неврологического отделения Генической ЦРБ, с целью улучшения условий пребывания пациентов",
— рассказал сотрудник Следственного комитета России.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
👀
 Кабмин
внёс
 в Раду новый законопроект о мобилизации, основные тезисы —
https://telegra.ph/Klyuchevye-vyderzhki-iz-zakonoproekta-Kabmina-o-mobilizacii-12-25
Ответственность за неявку в военкомат по новому законопроекту:
🟡
 запрет на выезд за границу,
🟡
  запрет на проведение операций с движимым и недвижимым имуществом,
🟡
  ограничения в праве управлять транспортным средством и получение водительского удостоверения,
🟡
  ограничение прав распоряжаться средствами и другими ценностями,
🟡
  отказы в подписании кредитных договоров,
🟡
  остановка получения льгот и услуг от государства.
⚓

Хуевая Одесса
 |
Ютуб
Твиттер
 |
Прислать новость


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
📰
 Франція питала інших союзників України, чи ті готові приєднатися до наземної операції. Огляд матеріалів іноземних медіа 4 березня
🖌
 Гучні заяви Емманюеля Макрона, зокрема, про ймовірність залучення у війні на боці України військ країн-союзниць ― традиційні для французької політики, стверджує в
статті
 на
Politico
 Іво Даадлер, колишній посол США в НАТО й керівник Чиказької ради з міжнародних справ. Колись Шарль де Голль показово розмістив ядерну зброю і на східному, і на західному кордоні ― ніби загроза йшла не лише від СРСР, а й від США. Ніколя Саркозі пафосно заявляв, що Франція починає військову операцію проти режиму Муаммара Каддафі в Лівії ― чудово розуміючи, що самотужки французьким військам така операція не під силу. І дійсно, за кілька днів операцію в Лівії вже здійснювала коаліція країн НАТО.
Макрон наслідує звички попередників. Якось він заявив, що «НАТО перебуває в стані клінічної смерті» ― за кілька тижнів до саміту держав-учасниць Альянсу. Тоді він закликав «не принижувати росію» ― за кілька місяців до того, як та напала на Україну. Потім він їздив до путіна і намагався відмовити того від планів агресії. Згодом казав, що Франція проштовхуватиме Україну в НАТО, чудово розуміючи, що без згоди Берліну й Вашингтона всі ці «проштовхування» марні. І тепер Макрон заявляє, що «росія не повинна перемогти» і залучення військового контингенту інших країн ― одна з опцій. «Отримувати вигоду без бажання платити ціну, схоже, частина ДНК Макрона», ― пише Даадлер.
Водночас кілька тижнів тому керівник Генштабу армії Франції Тьєррі Буркхард надіслав листа своїм колегам по НАТО, в якому описав можливість створення коаліції, що виконувала б в Україні певні завдання ― зокрема, керувала системами протиповітряної оборони, тренувала війська, проводила кібератаки й допомагала б із розмінуванням. Очевидно, пише Даадлер, ця пропозиція Буркхарда не могла надійти без погодження з Макроном. І кожен із союзників, як відомо автору статті, відповів на цю пропозицію рішучим «ні». Що не завадило Макрону заявити 27 лютого, що опція залучення іноземних військових ― серед тих, що розглядаються. Просто «на офіційному рівні не всі з нею згодні».
Можливо, насправді ця «риторична бомба» ― спроба відповісти на закиди партнерів по НАТО, що Париж не надто допомагає Україні зброєю. Так, якщо Німеччина за два роки повномасштабної війни надала Україні військової допомоги на €17,7 млрд, то допомога Франції, якщо врахувати обіцяні на 2024-й рік €3 мільярди, від початку повномасштабного вторгнення росії становить лише €6.8 мільярда. Природно, що Берлін критикував Францію через це. Макрон же спробував ущипнути Німеччину в подальшій дискусії щодо військового контингенту. «Багато з тих людей, які зараз кажуть, що цього ніколи не станеться, казали “ніколи-ніколи” й раніше: щодо літаків, далекобійної зброї, танків. Нагадаю вам, що два роки тому більшість із тих, хто сидить за цим столом, пропонували надати Україні лише спальні мішки та шоломи», ― сказав днями французький президент. Даадлер бачить у цьому лише політичну риторику і засуджує Макрона за те, що в такий спосіб той девальвує складну й болючу тему допомоги Україні.
🖌
 Також варті уваги
матеріал

The Washington Post
 про те, як українська влада намагається залучити до армії більше людей, і
текст

CNN
 про повільне просування росії вперед під Авдіївкою.
@babel
#інозмі


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🧐
Прогнози директора ЦРУ на 2024
Головне зі статті глави розвідки США Вільяма Бернса:
⏺
ЦРУ розглядає Китай як набагато більшу загрозу для США, ніж росію, тому за останні два роки агентство більш ніж подвоїло свій бюджет, орієнтований на Китай;
⏺
наразі США переживають один з таких рідкісних моментів, не менш значущих, ніж світанок холодної війни або період після подій 11 вересня;
⏺
"я не бачив Близького Сходу таким складним і вибухонебезпечним за останні 40 років";
⏺
епоха після холодної війни остаточно завершилася в той момент, коли росія прийшла в Україну в лютому 2022 року;
⏺
315 тис. російських солдатів убито або поранено, 2/3 танкових запасів знищено. Війна путіна вже обернулася для росії провалом на багатьох рівнях.
⏺
росія перетворюється на економічного васала Китаю, її економіка зазнає довгострокових невдач;
⏺
2024 рік буде важким на полі бою в Україні, випробуванням на міцність;
•••
Підписатися на канал

👤


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
🟢
 Національний банк, попри війну, продовжує реформувати фінансовий сектор, зокрема в напрямі його цифровізації.
1 квітня 2023 року відбувся перехід Системи електронних платежів (СЕП) НБУ на міжнародний стандарт ISO 20022, що дасть можливість втілювати подальші зміни платіжної інфраструктури.
☝
Про це розповів заступник Голови НБУ Олексій Шабан в
інтерв’ю Reuters.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Якщо росія використовуватиме іранські дрони з тією ж інтенсивністю, що і зараз, — вони закінчаться до травня 2023 року
 — Інститут дослідження війни (ISW).
Аналітики відштовхуються від даних української розвідки про те, що між Москвою і Тегераном існує домовленість про поставку 1750 БПЛА, 660 з яких рф вже використала.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User] Ранее мы писали, что путин умрет в этом году. В случае с Ковалевым и Стремоусовым мы оказывались правы. И на этот раз близки к правдивому прогнозу. Хотим медаль от Буданова.


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
⚡
Сьогодні річницю відзначає спецпідрозділ ГУР «Group 13» ― мисливці за кораблями окупантів.

Результат роботи операторів ударних дронів — знищені російські кораблі «цезарь куніков», «івановєц», «акула» та «серна», а також пошкоджені «іван хурс» та «сєрґєй котов».

Від редакції: привітайте хлопців щедрим донатом, щоб далі топити ворожий флот
👇
🔗
Збір на морський дрон для СБУ
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/7FKGvE4UpN


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
Познімали відосики наші хлопчики, висловились проти того, щоб заминали справу Гринкевичів…
Мужики, бляха, ваше відео змусило Ромку Грінкевича обісратися та втекти….тепер будемо військових залучати, щоб шукали, бо в ДБР та НП я сумніваюсь; знайдіть Ромку, хоть обісраним, але треба його судити.
Якщо якийсь інший гандон не домопіг йому втекти.
P.S. Він не винен, тому і втік
🤣
Офіцер ✙ | Підписатись


[System]
You are an expert in the fud manipulation technique. FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt): Sows fear, uncertainty, and doubt to manipulate perception and discourage opposition. List phrases that provide evidence of fud in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the fud manipulation.
To effectively refine your classifier for detecting the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) language manipulation technique in the provided texts, it is critical to establish clear classification guidelines. We need to reduce false positives by avoiding misclassification of benign or neutral phrases, and reduce false negatives by ensuring timely detection of FUD-related content. Below are recommended guidelines tailored for you:

### Classification Guidelines

1. **Identify FUD Keywords and Phrases:**
   - Search for words that evoke strong emotions related to fear, confusion, or doubt. Examples include:
     - Fear: "страшно", "жах", "катастрофа", "вбивство"
     - Uncertainty: "можливо", "нема гарантій", "неясно"
     - Doubt: "не вірю", "здається", "сумніви", "начебто"
   - Note that while exact matches are useful, variations and derivatives of these words should also be included (e.g., "страх", "боятися", "паніка").

2. **Contextual Analysis:**
   - Evaluate the context in which the keywords are used. A phrase might contain a FUD keyword but could be in a context that is neutral or critical rather than manipulative. For example:
     - Statements like "таке трапляється" or "можливо, це не правда" can often indicate a doubt but should not automatically be classified as FUD if they are providing critical analysis or commentary.
   - Use surrounding words and verbs as signals to determine the intent behind statements.
     - For example, "прогноз" (forecast) or "може" (could) without further stressful qualifiers may signify speculation rather than manipulation.

3. **Sentiment Analysis:**
   - Implement sentiment analysis tools to determine the emotional tone of the statements. FUD language often has a negative sentiment associated with:
     - War, loss, crises, and disasters.
     - Look for shifts in sentiment when certain keywords are clustered together, indicating a potential FUD message.

4. **Avoiding False Positives:**
   - Be cautious with phrases related to future events that do not carry an emotional charge, such as:
     - "невдовзі настане день звільнення Криму" (the day of Crimea's liberation will soon arrive) may not qualify as FUD unless framed within a context of threat or fear.
   - Exclude neutral phrases even if they contain strong words. For example:
     - "введення санкцій – це добре" (the introduction of sanctions is good) should not be classified as FUD despite the gravity of the subject.
   - Regularly update the classifier with new terms and phrases as the prevailing discourse evolves to keep it current.

5. **Recognizing FUD Patterns:**
   - Patterns can help you capture FUD efficiently. For example:
     - Repeated warnings about threats or dangers in close succession can indicate a FUD intent.
     - "знищать", "губити", "загрожує" (destroying, killing, threatening) can be part of FUD linguistic constructs when coupled with an exaggerated tone.

6. **Classification Hierarchies:**
   - Use a tiered classification system that weights phrases according to how strongly they evoke fear, uncertainty, or doubt.
     - Tier 1 (low FUD): Neutral reporting or analysis devoid of emotional undertones.
     - Tier 2 (moderate FUD): Acknowledgement of threats without exaggerated or alarming language.
     - Tier 3 (high FUD): Alarmist statements that clearly seek to induce fear or doubt among the audience.

7. **Continuous Learning:**
   - Regularly test and evaluate your classifier using both false positive and false negative cases. Machine learning algorithms require ongoing adjustments, so use user feedback, expert reviews, and real-world examples to continue improving your model.

By employing these guidelines, your classifier should more effectively identify FUD-related content while minimizing false classifications. This will enable you to respond more accurately to problematic content that seeks to manipulate perceptions through fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

[User]
У перший день після обстрілу Малецький взявся за голову, пригнав вишку, знімали на відео, як вони прибирали, але нічого до ладу не зробили і досі ніхто нічого не робить...
Підписатися
 •
Надіслати новину
 •
TT
 •
IG
 •
TW
 •
FB