[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Если ты задаешь вопросы относительно лиц, другой формы или отсутствия лент - ты работаешь на СБУ.
Надо будет дождаться комментария от диверсантов, им в этом плане веры больше, чем постоянно меняющим показания официалам.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Дітей депутатів можна та потрібно.
Дітей чиновників також.
Дітей мера Києва та Порошенка в першу чергу. Вони більше за всіх розповідають про любов до України
😁


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Рососія через своїх агентів у Німеччині намагалися зірвати поставки Україні танків Leopard
 — спільне розслідування Spiegel, The Insider та Bellingtcat.
Помічник депутата партії "Альтернатива для Німеччини" (AfD) Володимир Сергієнко та ймовірний співробітник ФСБ "Олексій", планували заблокувати поставки за допомогою позовів проти німецького уряду.
Приводом для позовів мало стати те, що канцлер Олаф Шольц погодився відправити танки в Україну без дозволу Бундестагу, хоча жоден закон Німеччини не вимагає такої згоди.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
⚡

На окупованих територіях Півдня України
залишається
 понад 150 тис окупантів

росія примусово вивозить цивільне населення з окупованих територій Херсонської та Запорізької областей, в тому числі й персонал захопленої ЗАЕС, аби люди не могли спостерігати за підготовкою ворога до боїв.
☝
 Водночас відведення бойових підрозділів рф ні з Запорізької, ні з Херсонської областей наразі не фіксують.
Підписатись на 24
К
анал


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
❗
ЕС оценивает потери среди украинских военных в 15 тысяч убитыми и около 35 000 человек — ранеными
, —
Euractiv со ссылкой на документ дипломатической службы
В то же время, по оценкам США, потери Украины составляют
17,5 тысяч убитыми
. Утверждается, что стали инвалидами, погибли или исчезли за время военных действий от 124 тысяч до 131 тысяч украинских военных.
Также, по данным американской разведки, с начала войны российские военные потеряли от
 189 500 до 223 000 человек
, в том числе
43 000
 человек
убитыми
 в бою.
Подписаться
 /
Прислать новость


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Прем’єр Угорщини Орбан
заявив
, що Україна — «фінансово неіснуюча країна». За його словами, коли США та Євросоюз вирішать не фінансувати Україну, війна «негайно закінчиться».


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Найглибші співчуття родинам загиблих у жахливій катастрофі, що сьогодні сталась в Броварах.
Батькам, які втратили дітей, рідним та близьким усіх жертв цієї трагедії.
Колегам та друзям керівництва МВС: Міністра Дениса Монастирського, його першого заступника Євгєнія Єніна та Державного секретаря Юрія Лубковича.
Світла пам'ять загиблим!


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Недо-Рейх Зеленского продолжает жить в параллельной реальности, оказывается, «мэр» Мариуполя Бойченко, который трусливо сбежал из города после начала СВО так и не захотев помочь мирным жителям с эвакуацией, не за решеткой.
Гауляйтер Мариуполя от Зеленского ездит по Европам и обсуждает «план по восстановлению города». Думаю, скачал план развития Мариуполя в интернете, утвержденный правительством России, понаставил там символики недо-Рейха и отправился в ЕС «лохов на деньги разводить»)))
На этом фоне «Фонд по озеленению Луны» из романа-сказки Носова выглядит вполне себе жизнеспособным проектом)))
Уверен, по наставлениям Остапа Бендера он еще европейцам будет рассказывать, мол посмотрите сколько Зеленский вкладывает в Мариуполь сейчас, какая стройка большая, не хватает еще денег малек, пару миллиардов, подсобите кто чем может)))


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
• командующий Воздушными силами ВСУ Олещук
признал
 украинским удар по Геническу, назвав его ответом на российский ракетный террор;
•
спутниковые снимки
 понтонного моста, наведённого рядом с повреждёнными Чонгарскими;
• Сырский в интервью
Guardian
: Украина пока привлекла к контрнаступлению ограниченные силы;
• Украина
вернула
 тела 51 погибшего военнослужащего;
•
расследование Би-би-си
, как студенты из Непала попадают в российскую армию;
• ФСБ
опубликовало
 видео задержания тех, кто якобы пытался купить цезий-137;
•
поддержать
 команду CIT.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Российские и украинские СМИ пишут про ликвидацию предателя Кивы. Как я уже много раз подчеркивал, в таких случаях важна атмосфера страха, которая формируется после таких операций. Иногда, специально можно убрать восемь человек из десяти, чтобы вот те двое жили дальше, боясь даже своей тени, и тем самым были для вас удобным материалом. С ним можно работать - формировать общественное мнение, влиять на других лиц, иметь доступ и т.д. Кстати, Кива был в том числе и махровым антисемитом, которому везде мерещился еврейский заговор с целью уничтожения всех славян, построения небесного Иерусалима и другая ахинея в стиле шизы русов против ящеров. В общем, если некрологи не врут, то пациент был красиво уложен спать - прямо в снежок.
@yigal_levin


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Весеннее обострение...
https://peremogi.livejournal.com/70843537.html
#ненаши

#аберрация сознания

#тронный зал института мозга


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Ойойой. Це зальот. Якщо це розійдеться погана ситуація Ізраїлю стане просто жахливою. Як можна так лажати...
CNN вважає, що Ізраїль підкинув зброю в госпіталь Аль-Шифу. На кадрах спочатку опублікованих ЦАХАЛ, біля МРТ був 1 автомат АК 47, а коли допустили журналістів BBC і FOX в тому самому місці було вже 2 АК.
...


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
А французькі найманці і негри натовці танцюючі на танках все одно у тебе.
Кожне слово яке йобане багно рашка піздить на когось, то воплі злодія "шапку вкрали"


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Некоторые депутаты Думы решили немножко задать вопросы по поводу электронных повесток. Мол, почему так срочно, почему вообще такое принимать, если раньше заявляли другое.
На что спикер Думы Володин ответил гениально: “Зачем вы становились депутатом ГД? Чтобы саботировать решения?”.
То есть, парламент, который является репрезентативным органом всего народа, представляющим разнообразие мыслей, позиций и голосований не должен в России саботировать решения
😄


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
🇺🇦

86% підлітків бачать своє майбутнє в Україні
– опитування
95% опитаних українських підлітків
вірять
 у перемогу України у війні


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Полковник США в отставке Дуглас Макгрегор:
"США отстают от России по военной мощи, так как российская армия стала ударной силой, а американской армии нужны месяцы, чтобы достичь уровня российской армии по боеспособности.
Схема уничтожения России была глупой схемой.Сегодня, как мы видим, у нас нет ни боеприпасов для отправки в Украину, ни военнослужащих, в отличие от России, у которой в столице 300 тысяч резервистов, готовых к наступлению".
Нас всегда удивляют высказывания "настоящего полковника" Макгрегора, который постоянно заявляет о слабости США и мощи России. Ведь он военный и патриот свое страны - зачем ему это всё нужно?
А расчёт тут нехитрый: вашингтонские власти постоянно "бодрит" оружейное лобби, которому нужно много военных заказов и денег. А что лучше работает, чем "российская угроза"? Как говорится - проверенный временем бренд.
Первый Харьковский
|
Предложить новость


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
НАТО повністю "мертве" і США вийдуть з альянсу, — Трамп
Єврокомісар з питань внутрішнього ринку Тьєррі Бретон заявив, що на економічному форумі в Давосі в 2020 році екс-президент США на приватній зустрічі попередив Урсулу фон дер Ляйєн, що США не захищатимуть і відправлятимуть свої війська Євросоюзу у разі нападу Росії. Також він додав, що НАТО назавжди "мертве".
🇺🇦
Підписатись
 |
Запропонувати новину
✍


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
От я вже не раз зарікався: доки при владі зграя зелених мародерів, не вір нікому, хто до неї пристане. Ні, якби справді була можливість виправити щось і зробити корисну справу, то навіть у таку владу слід іти. Якщо ти безкомпромісна й цілковито добропорядна людина. Але ця влада ламає ніби ж і цілком гідних довіри людей. От я ж не клював, на відміну, від інших, на десятки "о! нарешті хороша людина прийшла, тепер усе піде чесно й ефективно", наприклад, тих же Рєзнікова чи Умерова.
 Але двічі таки публічно висловив задоволення - про нового міністра освіти Оксена Лісового й керівника Державної служби етнополітики й свободи совісті Віктора Єленського. З Лісовим якось: ні туди, ні сюди... А Єленського тепер дуже хвалять в упц-мп. Радіють, що став на "путь просвєтлєнія". Уся ця історія із імітацією "заборони" московської церкви в урядовому законі - явний приклад. А зараз уже й публічні заяви. Пане Вікторе, нагадаю Вам, що колись Ви й самі пам'ятали, що існування в нас московської церкви - це якраз і є пряма загроза національній безпеці.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Години на полігоні - рятівні секунди в бою.
Кожну вільну хвилину бійці 501 окремий батальйон морської піхоти витрачають з користю, відточують навички зі стрільби, вивчають нові методи ведення бою.
Впевнено стоїмо на захисті Батьківщини!
Наближаємо Перемогу!
🇺🇦
Слава Україні!
🇺🇦
Слава морській піхоті!
#501обмп

#ua_navy


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Гроші даємо, а бажаючих мало
🤷
.
Поки ви вагаєтесь – шанс отримати кошти з міського бюджету на ваш проект може від вас вислизнути
💸
. А шкода – бо ви можете покращити громаду, благоустрій двору, озеленити район чи влаштувати велодоріжку, відремонтувати дитячий майданчик та впровадити багато інших цікавих ініціатив. Це той випадок, коли не депутати виирішують долю вашого мікрорайону чи двору, а ви
☝
.
Варто лише придумати проект. Залишити проектну заявку online
📲
 і відслідковувати долю свого проекту прямо на сайті:
https://if.pb.org.ua/

або принести
🚶
свій проект у відділ звернень Івано-Франківської міської ради.
🔊
Маєте час до 30 березня. Встигніть, бо поки подали лише чотири проекти. Тож ваш має всі шанси на перемогу!
Успіху
✊
!