[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Для мене команда - це головне. Коли збирається крута команда - всі задачі стають по плечу.
Нам вдалось на залізниці в великій мірі тому що була крута команда,
#залізна_команда
.
Тепер збираю круту команду в оборонці. Теж залізну, ясне діло :)
Ганна Гвоздяр доєдналась до команди МінСтратегПрому недавно, але вже точно частина нашої
#залізної_команди
 :)
Послухайте що
Ганна розказала Радіо Свобода про свої напрямки
 - дрони, медеваки, техніку для розмінування.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User] Іран обіцяє атакувати бази США у разі, якщо Ізраїль за підтримки США завдасть удару по Ірану у відповідь.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
#Путін
 заявив Ердогану, що Україна має змиритися з втратою територій для діалогу.
Путин скоро умрет, сказал Буданов.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
З Днем танкових військ братів по зброї вітає екіпаж танку Т-72, який повністю складається з мобілізованих військовослужбовців.
Командир танку Юрій (48 років) до широкомасштабного вторгнення працював інженером у компанії, яка займалася будівництвом трубопроводів і газопроводів, під час навчання у вузі закінчив військову кафедру і отримав офіцерське звання.
Навідник Армен (36 років) у мирному житті був моряком, а зараз вражає побратимів точністю ведення вогню, влучаючи у ворожі цілі з першого пострілу.
Механік-водій Віктор (40 років) раніше працював водієм. Керувати танком він навчився ще під час строкової служби, тож швидко згадав здобуті навички.
Звичайні українські чоловіки, які у важку годину без сумнівів стали до лав Збройних Сил, невтомно знищують ворога і свято вірять у нашу перемогу.
22-га окрема механізована бригада.
#ЗахисникиНезалежності

#DefendersOfIndependence
@AFUStratCom
СтратКом ЗСУ у соцмережах
👇

Facebook
 |
YouTube
 |
Instagram
 |
Twitter
 |


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Потери
🇺🇦
Украины «не так велики, как люди представляют». Это менее 100 тысяч
, — Лидер украинской фракции «Слуга народа» Арахамия.
«Когда вы идете на улицы и спрашиваете людей о потерях, я не слышал ни разу меньше 100 000. А
наши потери гораздо меньше
», – заверил он.
Потерь  нет на Украине... все пропадают без вести
🤔


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Ким Чен Ын прибыл в рф

на встречу с путиным
, сообщает издание Kyodo
Сегодня путин будет
приплясывать перед товарищем
 вести с ним переговоры о поставках северокорейского вооружения.
Остаться с нами в Телеграм
 |
Восхититься нашим YouTube


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Вночі 17 січня 13 бригада 1 підстанції Одеської «екстренки» отримала виклик – Шахед влучив в один з багатоквартирних будинків міста.
За 7 хвилин бригада була вже поряд, але терористи запустили другу хвилю дронів і повторно поцілили у той самий будинок.
💔
Медикам вдалося змінити маршрут і не потрапити під удар дрона. Згідно з найкращими світовими стандартами команда розгорнула оперативний штаб та визначила пріоритет надання допомоги.
На щастя, загиблих не було, але миттєва реакція команди медиків була критично важливою для важкопоранених. Всі вони у найкоротші терміни були госпіталізовані.
У цю ніч 13 бригада у складі лікаря – Крижановського Владислава Євгеновича, фельдшерів – Качана Андрія Андрійовича, Свалової Ірини Михайлівни та водія Чіпіжина Володимира врятувала життя людей.
🙏
За кілька днів до того – 13 січня – ворог вдарив ракетами й по Шостці. Фельдшер з медицини невідкладних станів місцевої станції екстреної медичної допомоги Владислав Лисоконь отримав виклик до жінки з уламковим пораненням скроні.
Фельдшер був єдиним медпрацівником у складі своєї бригади, він професійно надав необхідну екстрену медичну допомогу 47-річній постраждалій  і стабілізував її стан. Після цього жінку доставили до центральної районної лікарні – її життя було врятоване!
🙏
У своєму зверненні медикам подякував Президент.
Ми приєднуємося до слів вдячності. Українські медики – це приклад для всієї медичної спільноти світу. Ми вами пишаємось.
🤝


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Десятки писем получали от читателей, которые жаловались на действия Кабмина, который потребовал вернуть деньги выданные украинцам как помощь в начале войны. Сколько было пиара на этом власти все помнят, но все забыли с кем имеют дело. Теперь решили обокрасть учителей, насколько это низко даже писать не хочется, но зато нардепы получают компенсации, а чиновники премии…
 Министерство образования (!) требует у учителей вернуть 6500 грн (!) которые были выданы для поддержки после 24 февраля через «єПідтримка». И грозит судом.
Деньги требуют вернуть на специальный счет Минэкономики.
В официальном письме, на меня произвело впечатление несколько деталей.
1. Учителям нужно внимательно следить за комиссией банка (!) чтобы сумма возврата была равна 6500 грн + комиссия. Иначе возврат не будет засчитан в полной мере.
2. В случае невозврата в кратчайшие сроки – стягивание через суд.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
На Донеччині викрито «агентурну мережу» фсб рф, яка передавала інформацію про місця дислокації особового складу та техніки ЗСУ
🔷
За процесуального керівництва Донецької обласної прокуратури
викрито і повідомлено про підозру
 двом громадянам України у державній зраді (ч. 2  ст. 111 КК України).
🔹
За даними слідства, у червні 2023 року співробітник фсб рф завербував двох мешканців Донецької області для підривної діяльності в Україні.

🔹
Однією з них виявилась мешканка смт Курахівка, яка передавала дані представнику спецслужб через свого родича - військовослужбовця одного з армійських корпусів зс держави-агресора.
🔹
У голосових повідомленнях вона розповідала про розміщення особового складу і техніки ЗСУ на території населеного пункту та в Покровському районі.
🔹
Особливу увагу жінка приділяла інформації щодо розташування підприємств та інших споруд. Через деякий час майже по всім надісланим підозрюваною локаціям були «прильоти».
🔹
Ще одним «інформатором» став уродженець Республіки Таджикистан. Він напряму відправляв розвідувальні дані через Telegram співробітнику фсб рф.
🔹
У текстових повідомленнях чоловік надсилав інформацію про місця дислокації українських військових і техніки.

🔹
За свою старанність «розвідник» отримував від фсб рф грошову винагороду.
🔹
Наразі обом підозрюваним обрано запобіжні заходи у вигляді тримання під вартою без альтернативи внесення застави.
🔹
Досудове розслідування – ГУ СБУ в Донецькій та Луганській областях.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
⚡
Майже 96 тис. транспортних засобів оформлено митниками у якості гуманітарної допомоги від початку війни
🚚
 Загальний обсяг ввезених в Україну гуманітарних вантажів від початку війни складає 1 344 222 тонни, у тому числі майже 96 тис. транспортних засобів.
Окрім того, в якості гуманітарної допомоги завозились лікарські засоби, медичне обладнання, продукти харчування, військове спорядження, одяг, взуття, генератори та багато іншого.
☝
Нагадуємо, що декларація на ввезення гуманітарної допомоги може бути подана митниці як у паперовій, так і в електронній формі.
Створити електронну декларацію можна в Особистому кабінеті на Єдиному державному інформаційному вебпорталі «Єдине вікно для міжнародної торгівлі»
https://cabinet.customs.gov.ua
 або за допомогою сервісу, розробленого за підтримки Офісу Президента України та Держмитслужби:
https://bit.ly/3OIXyei
.
Завантажити і роздрукувати бланк декларації для подачі у паперовій формі можна за посиланням:
https://bit.ly/3bC8aNu


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
@writetodarkkbot

Бахмут и Мальдивы.
Что может быть общего между самой горячкой точкой боевых действий и мировым курортом? Может, это два сотрудника Центрального Аппарата Таможенной службы Украины,  Станислав Мешко и  Владимир Касьян. Пока Стас воевал и геройски погиб под Бахмутом, Вова воровал и отдыхал на Мальдивах. Но самое циничное, что коррупционнер Касьян, не только не отстранен от должности главного кадровика службы после отдыха на Мальдивах, а вдруг внезапно заболел и ушёл на больничный. Отдыхать здоровье есть, а отвечать за свои вояжи во время войны нет. Вопрос, как Касьяна выпустили из Украины, при запрете выезда мужчин от 18 до 60 лет во время военного положения? Только за это его должны были уволить? Не тут-то было. ВБ даже проверку не назначили, а все потому, что все "хлебные" должности Касьян продает, в том числе и  внутренней безопасности службы. А где СБУ и НАБУ? В СБУ и НАБУ Касьян должности точно не продаёт. Касьян не просто коррупционнер среднего звена, а мародёр во время войны. Все эти конкурсы на должности, это конкурс у кого кошелек толще. А потом удивляемся, что нельзя победить коррупцию на таможне, но это только один элемент коррупции, торговля должностями ниже руководства таможенной службы. Главное руководство таможни это отдельная история, где много составляющих, политическая коррупция завязанная на высшие эшелоны власти.
Но почему такие гниды как Касьян продолжают работать и ничего не боятся? Почему никто не может проверить врача, который выписал липовый больничный, это ведь подделка документов? Почему после года работы главный кадровик таможни, имеет парк автомобилей, недвижимость на тысячи долларов записанных на близких родственников и всё это во время войны. Неужели нельзя провести проверку и показательно посадить и конфисковать награбленное у таких коррупцитнеров, как Касьян?
Вы можете представить, что будет с такими касьянами после  нашей Победы? Вернуться настоящие патриоты, которые ушли на фронт с таможенной службы, а там сидит кадровик Касьян, вместо тюрьмы? Будет самосуд и могут пострадать герои войны из-за гниды коррупционера.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
🇺🇦
Сьогодні
«Азов»
 відзначає 9-ту річницю від дня свого заснування.
Підрозділ, який звільняв Маріуполь, Широкине, Павлопіль, Комінтернове, Лебединське, бився в Іловайську, Мар'їнці, Красногорівці, постійно виконував завдання із контрбатарейної та контрснайперської боротьби на фронті, 8 місяців обороняв Світлодарську дугу і 86 днів тримав оточений ворогом Маріуполь.
Дуже сильне відео.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
#кулуарные_слухи

Коллеги вы еще забыли указать,
 что такая вышка является еще стратегическим объектом, который используют для связи ВСУ, силовиков и госаппарата.
Так, что данный объект отчасти военный и это огромная проблема для внутренней коммуникации.
Офисные при этом делают упор только на удар по ящику, специально недоговаривая о реальном предназначении такого сооружения.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
⚡

«Давай, Россия!»
🇦🇺
 В австралийском Сиднее прошел митинг в поддержку российской операции на Украине, в котором приняли участие 1,5 тыс человек. Участники акции принесли плакаты с надписями: «Украина – террористическое государство. Поддерживай Россию!» и «Нет войне с Россией!»


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Періодично хтось із російських офіційних осіб виходить, щоб заявити: «Росію не перемогти на полі бою». І роблять це вже 600+ діб поспіль, водночас намагаючись знайти собі нового господаря-гаранта, втрачаючи залишки вчорашньої репутації мілітарного монстра, скуповуючи військову техніку в Ірані/Північній Кореї, відправляючи дедалі більше мобілізованих у м’ясорубку. Своїми бравурними заявами росіяни маскують страх перед підсумковою обов’язковою відповідальністю й намагаються все/таки розв’язати головне завдання: блефом, шантажем, масовими смертями, пропагандою виторгувати собі... оперативну паузу, перевести війну в «затяжний формат низької інтенсивності». А потім поторгуватися, повернутися до нахабства й ультиматумів, спровокувати ще більше супутніх конфліктів в інших регіонах...
Важливо на цьому етапі війни (важкому, поза сумнівом) розуміти, що будь-яке закінчення війни несправедливим фіналом, будь-який компроміс із Рф забезпечить виживання нинішній російській (путінській) еліті, яка точно вже не повернеться в законослухняний стан і яка точно продовжить «вбивати» міжнародне право, глобальну стабільність, демократію. Історію нинішньої Росії треба довести до справедливого фіналу...


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
🔴

Рівно рік тому
,
14 липня, сталась найстрашніша трагедія в історії
Вінниці

😔
Російські ракети вбили 29 людей, троє з яких були маленькими дітками.
👉

Термінові новини Вінниці

👈


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Около 3 часов назад мужчина взорвался на мине, работая в поле
Трагедия произошла в Широкой Балке при обработке земли. К сожалению, травмы были несовместимы с жизнью, он погиб.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
“Щоб добитися Перемоги – не достатньо тільки обстріляти противника, – необхідно зайняти його окопи та повністю знищити!”: Герой України Денис Макаровський
розповідає про бої на Харківщині та Донеччині, як змінився противник,
Офіцер 81-ї окремої аеромобільної бригади ДШВ ЗС України, Герой України майор Денис Макаровський розповідає в деталях:
– За що отримав звання Героя України, будучи командиром розвідувальної роти;
– Як змінився противник з початком повномасштабної війни та його тактику;
– Які завдання наразі виконує підрозділ ведучи бойові дії на одному з найбільш важливих напрямків;
– Про мотивацію особового складу;
– Для чого йде більшість росіян на війну (свідчення полонених)
– Про підготовку мобілізованих військовослужбовців.
Деталі у відео
surl.li/jwxkf
Разом до Перемоги! ДШВ – Завжди Перші! Слава Україні!
🇺🇦
🇺🇦
🇺🇦
#stoprussia

#ДШВ

#ЗСУ

#Завжди_Перші

#UkrainianAirAssaultForces


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
🤦🏻♂
А вот такие шоколадки можно встретить в/на Украине.
Её обёртка в очередной раз доказывает, что в стране 404 процветает нацизм
У бандеровцев не осталось ничего святого...
Все,к чему они прикасаются превращается в дерьмо
💩

Подписаться на канал
Скинуть инфу:
@gury_predlozhka