[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
💣
Два ворожих танки стали новою купою металобрухту на нашій землі. Так днями спрацювали бійці роти ударних безпілотних авіаційних комплексів 46 оаембр. Чіткі команди, наведення, влучання – і результат, який тішить душу й серце. А окупантам нагадуємо: «не@//й шастать!».
📽
Служба зв'язків з громадськістю 46 окремої аеромобільної бригади ДШВ ЗС України
#stoprussia

#ДШВ

#ЗСУ

#Завжди_Перші

#UkrainianAirAssaultForces
#AirAssaultForces

#WarInUkraine

#RussianAggression
#BattleOfUkrainianAirAssaultForces


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
«Санкции из ада» не помогли — доходы  России только растут

После начала российской "спецоперации" в Украине в феврале 2022 года западные политики пообещали ответить «санкциями из ада». Однако, как отмечает Foreign Policy, обещанный «ад» для России спустя полтора года так и не наступил.
Так, в 2022 году Россия получила ещё больший доход от нефти, чем в 2021-м. И хотя западные санкции, казалось, привели к снижению доходов российского бюджета в начале 2023 года, Кремль научился лучше обходить ограничительные меры. В сочетании с благоприятной динамикой цен на нефть доходы государства в области энергетики выросли на 15% в сентябре этого года и увеличились более чем в два раза с сентября по октябрь.

Издание отмечает, что это позволяет России не только планировать увеличение расходов на оборону с 3,9% до 6% ВВП в рамках проекта бюджета на 2024 год, но и пользоваться широкой поддержкой населения "спецоперации" в Украине. В подобных условиях, пишет Foreign Policy, Россия продолжит военную операцию и «её приверженность финансированию войны может пережить приверженность со стороны Запада, в которой всё более явно проступают трещины».


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Якщо взяти експорт нашого зерна до ЄС:
Фактично виходить так, що нашому зерну там не раді, бо "страждають європейські фермери".
Однак російське зерно продовжує туди потрапляти, бо "продовольча безпека". Ба більше, частину цього зерна росіяни вкрали на наших тимчасово окупованих територіях, чим вони не забувають хизуватись.
Все це виглядає геть несправедливим. Може, прийшов час російське зерно в Європі замінити українським? Якщо європейці спромоглися позбутись російського газу, то чому б не позбутись російського зерна? Тим паче, що українське все одно краще.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
СБУ повідомила про підозру прокремлівському тіктокеру, який влаштовував провокації у Києво-Печерській лаврі
Зловмисником виявився 46-річний мешканець столиці. На власній сторінці у соцмережі TikTok він розміщував дописи, в яких заперечував збройну агресію рф і дискредитував військово-політичне керівництво України.
Також фігурант брав активну участь у провокаціях на території Києво-Печерської лаври наприкінці березня і на початку квітня поточного року.
Тоді він публічно підбурював людей чинити спротив законним діям представників влади та правоохоронців.
Крім того, він безпідставно звинувачував українських захисників у розв’язанні війни.

Надіслати новину
@novosti_kieva_bot
👉
 ПІДПИСАТИСЯ


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
😱
росія повернула собі ініціативу на полі бою і готова до наступальних операцій
, –
ISW.
Американські аналітики вважають, що окупанти можуть проводити наступальні операції, коли і де захочуть.
Але ЗСУ можуть позбавити росію цих можливостей, якщо вони матимуть достатньо сил і зброї.
Русский Корабль Иди… |

Надіслати новину


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
На росії бізнесу радять купувати ППО для захисту
Голова комітету Держдуми з оборони Андрій Картаполов радить російським компаніям  закуповувати системи протиповітряної оборони (ППО) для боротьби з дронами.
"Вони [українці] приблизно знають, де наші засоби ППО розташовані, і запустити безпілотник за маршрутом, щоб він пройшов, не тільки огинаючи рельєф, а й оминаючи ці ж райони протиповітряної оборони, цілком можливо",
— зазначив Картаполов.
Депутат вважає за необхідне стимулювати російських бізнесменів закуповувати засоби протидії дронам на постійній основі, навіть у разі закінчення війни в Україні. За його словами, системи ППО стануть у пригоді й надалі "для протидії терористам".


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User] У Дніпрі таке пекло, а найгірше те, що ми можемо тільки чекати, коли стурбовані остаточно приймуть рішення знищити рашку, а поки вони хочуть робити це поступово, ціною наших життів.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Впервые стрим на канале "Шейтельман" собрал 10 тысяч украинцев и друзей Украины одновременно! Достойно отметили путинский ордер, я считаю! Спасибо всем!!!
💛
💙


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
🇷🇺
 —
 «Всем стоять! Працюэ украинская армия!»
                     — «Пошёл нах пи**р!»

🔞
Боевики ВСУ показали недавнюю попытку штурма дома с бойцами ЧВК «Вагнер» в Бахмуте.
Украинцы вопили и стреляли куда-то туда, боясь нарваться на ответную пулю. Атака была неудачной, да и в итоге все они проиграли — Артёмовск наш.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User] Що змушує активізуватися сьогодні диктаторські режими та їхніх терористичних посіпак? Вони сприймають невизначеність як слабкість. Вони вважають, що Америку лихоманить, а Європа слабка. Вони вважають, що ідеальний момент настав, і це збуджує їхні уяви, штовхаючи підвищувати ставки. Сигнали, що транслюються, важливі. Час довести: сили зла помиляються та недооцінюють силу демократій. Більше принципових рішень.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Уже ссытесь, твари? Это хорошо! Скоро сраться начнёте...
https://peremogi.livejournal.com/70751363.html
#украинство - это

#ублюдки и выродки просто сдохнут

#страна 404


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Україна вимагатиме виключення Ізраїлю з "формату Рамштайну".
Про це пише The Kyiv Post із посиланням на джерело в РНБО.
За даними співрозмовника журналістів, "ізраїльська влада так і не надала реальної допомоги, натомість інформація, отримана під час зустрічі, використовується Ізраїлем у власних інтересах".
Хтось сумнівався? Рік тому ще казав про позицію та інтереси Ізраїлю. Їх цікавить виключно користь для них і додаткова комунікація з США в рамках Рамштайну, бо політика на Близькому сході та їх російський вектор йдуть в розріз з нашим.
Сподіватися на реальну допомогу від Ізраїлю, таку, яку надавав євреям український народ під час Другої світової, не варто.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Криворожские полицейские фабриковали статьи для выполнения плана.
Схематозница призналась в том, что сотрудничала с копами, но те ее подставили.
Теперь ей светит настоящий срок вместо условного.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
⚡
Пошли на Бахмутском направлении вперед! Это, конечно, хорошо, но какая дальнейшая цель?
Вернуть, как было до этого - сидим в Бахмуте, отражаем штурмы?
Шило на мыло. Весь этот порыв, да на Запорожское направление бы...
@HolodniyYar


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Мы одна большая семья — Путин
"Мы вместе, и сделаем все так, как хотим сделать, как мечтаем. Верю в наши победы, в успехи, в будущее России" — Путин
Этими словами президент завершил послание.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
🔴
Координатор по стратегическим коммуникациям Совета нацбезопасности США Джон Кирби заплакал в прямом эфире, говоря о жертвах в Израиле.
«Я… Простите. Это очень… Простите. Очень тяжело смотреть на эти кадры и на человеческие жертвы»
.
@berezoview


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Ну що ж, ось одна з мотузок, якою сучасну Україну спробували
〰
прив'язати до авторитарного руского міра за допомогою
🏳🌈
ЛГБТК+=-
 лівого прогресивізму:
Тетяна Монтян
 не дуже любить
Доту 2
, але
дуже любить геїв
 та у
 2014
 році балатувалася в депутати як захисниця ЛГБ, що деякі ЛГБТ спільноти підхоплювали та піарили її як свою прогресивну союзницю.
Цікаво, що декілька місяців тому вона написала для
🤮
🎈
✌
RT
пост
 (останні 2 пікчі), в якому критикує вже нові цивільні партнерства в Україні, що надають більше прав одностатевим парам. Friendly fire, на який ми заслуговуємо.
За запрошенням расії, вона виступала в савбєзі ООН
17 лютого 2022
, де пояснювала як саме Україна порушує Мінськ.
Ліва спільното, поясни:
Ті, хто підтримують одностатеві пари — рашисти? А ви так само разом з правами меншин хочете завезти в Україну російський комунізм? Вона нині доволі
популярна у ватної авдиторії
, чи це свідчить про те, що вата = лгбт, чому ні?
Треба вже навчитися нормально заплітати і розплутувати маніпуляції.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User] Человек как бы подчеркивает - ему ничего не будет. Он крышует наркоторговлю, крышует коллцентры, а его "правоохранительные органы" не замечают как будто. Закон для лохов. Глумись дальше.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User] Скоро появятся истории о святых мучениках Крокуса.  1. "Он с детства хотел быть учёным, переводил бабушек через дорогу, кормил бездомных животных и учился на одни пятёрки..."  2." Когда они пошли на представление, я в этот момент, была дома и что-то почувствовала…


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
🇺🇦
З перших вуст про ситуацію на Запорізькому напрямку і не лише про це
"Что происходит?!
Российские пропагандистские ресурсы, "эксперты" и прочие говорящие головы, сейчас убеждают своих верных потребителей информационного фаст-фуда, что "наступление" СОУ
🇺🇦
проходит в зоне, вне основной линии обороны российской армии.
И это правда. Но есть нюанс.
Та зона где сейчас СОУ проводит разведку боем/оперативную разведку/глубинную разведку - это операционная зона. Она предназначена для торможения продвижения основных сил противника и, по возможности, их полной остановки. Именно там сосредоточены основные минно-фугасные заграждения и секреты.
Итак, российские пропагандисты говорят правду - это не основная линия обороны, но и наступление СОУ ещё даже не начинали, а проводят совсем другие мероприятия.
В свою очередь, что происходит с силами РОВ? А силы РОВ, находившиеся в резерве, в основном на 2-й и 3-й линиях, тянут к полосе обеспечения!
В частности, чтобы остановить продвижение СОУ вниз по Мокрым Ялам к Старомлыновке, командование РОВ подорвало из "комфортных" окопчиков 127-ю МСД. 58А на Запорожских просторах так же себя не сильно комфортно стала чувствовать и ей срочно понадобился дополнительный ресурс 49А.
Из Херсонской области стали стягивать силы в треугольник Токмак-Василевка-Мелитополь, для укрепления третьей линии.
Что так? Почему так? Резервы были брошены для усиления 2-й линии или все ушли ложится костьми в полосе обеспечения? А, что же тогда левый берег, большая вода-то сходит?
Я достаточно давно уже пишу о том, у РОВ во всей зоне боевых действий, самая проблематичная группировка в Херсонской и Запорожской областях. Детально расписывая, от месяца к месяцу, я указывал на их главные уязвимые места, а именно - отсутствие полной штатной комплектации техникой подразделений...
А так же отсутствие возможности заполнения всех линий обороны пропорционально достаточным количеством... обороняющихся. То есть, им не только критически не хватает техники, для того количества людей, что у них есть, но и критически не хватает людей, чтобы ими полностью заполнить линии обороны.
И сейчас мы видим во всей красе проявление всех этих фактов.
В то время как СОУ всерьёз ещё ничего не начинали и используют подразделения ограниченного функционала, РОВ вынуждены уже вводить в действие свои резервы со 2-й и 3-й линии!
Конечно, российские пропагандисты своим потребителям информационного фаст-фуда этого не расскажут. Они расскажут о том, что у украинской армии в результате "провалившегося" наступления более 50% потерь всего личного состава, уничтожены все танки Leopard 2, Киев в панике, у Байдена истерика...
Что же... Пусть так. Но с учётом тех движений которые происходят в глубоком и не очень тылу на временно оккупированных территориях Юга Украины, можно сделать вывод о том, что на самом деле предынсультное состояние как-раз у путина и сегодняшняя встреча с лизоблюдами режима ему далась с трудом.
Мы находимся на пороге великих событий и в то время, как СОУ оперирует силами уровня разведбатов, наш враг лихорадочно стягивает по сусекам остатки морпехов, никогда не видевших моря и арктических штурмовиков, которым не суждено будет стать ужином белых медведей... Почему? Да потому что...
Слава нації!", - військовий експерт Олександр Коваленко