[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
⚡
В Московской области теракт.
Наши соболезнования.
P.S. Ублюдки конечно  же сейчас начнут радоваться.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Главным материалом выпуска The New York Times Magazine стал репортаж из Киевской психиатрической больницы, где проходят реабилитацию военные.
"В мирное время в "Павловке" лечили людей с тяжелыми психическими заболеваниями, в основном шизофренией, но война заставила изменить специализацию. Больницы в Украине не могут справиться с количеством психиатрических травм, командиры же при этом нуждаются в возвращении своих военных. В июне прошлого года в "Павловке" открыли переходное отделение на 40 коек, которое за полгода выросло до 100", - говорится в материале.
Многие бойцы, проходящие лечение, еще год назад были специалистами мирных профессий, говорится в репортаже. Один солдат говорит, что когда он вернулся из зоны боевых действий, у него больше не было возможности спать. Другой говорит, что больше не может терпеть толпы. По его словам, он ощущает в такие моменты, "как когда ты идешь на рыбалку, и запутываешься в леску".


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Нардепа Артура Герасимова остаточно звільнили від відповідальності у справі про незадекларовану віллу в Іспанії через сплив строків давності
— Центр протидії корупції.
Повідомляється, що апеляційна палата ВАКС залишила без задоволення апеляційну скаргу прокурора, задовольнила клопотання захисту і звільнила нардепа "Європейської солідарності" від відповідальності у зв’язку із закінченням строків давності.
Нагадаємо, що в середині серпня перша інстанція ВАКС визнала нардепа винним у недекларуванні вілли в Іспанії, але звільнила його від покарання. Все через сплив строків давності.
Тоді судді самостійно перекваліфікували дії Герасимова із нетяжкого злочину на проступок, внаслідок чого строк давності зменшився до двох років.
"Хоча прокуратура інкримінували Герасимову вчинення злочину, передбаченого ч. 2 ст. 366-2 КК України, так як задекларовані Герасимовим відомості відрізнялися від достовірних на 8,8 млн грн.
На думку прокуратури, це більш ніж у 4 191 раз перевищувало прожитковий мінімум для працездатних осіб, встановлений у Держбюджеті України на 2020 рік (тоді ця сума дорівнювала 2 102 грн).
Водночас суд вказав, що розмір прожиткового мінімуму треба рахувати станом на дату вчинення кримінального правопорушення (07.04.2021), а не станом на останній день звітного періоду для декларування (31.12.2020).
У 2021 році розмір прожиткового мінімуму був 2 270 грн, а отже відомості, зазначені Герасимовим у декларації, перевищували прожитковий мінімум для працездатних осіб лише у 3 881 раз. А це уже кримінальний проступок, строк давності за яким менший",
 — пояснили у ЦПК.
**У серпні ВАКС визнав Герасимова винуватим у недекларуванні майна за кордоном, але звільнив від відповідальності через сплив строків давності.
У 2013 році нардеп придбав віллу в Іспанії за 190 тисяч євро, але стверджував, що вона належить не йому, а його матері, оскільки була "подарована" їй на підставі відповідного договору. Після звинувачення САП Герасимов заявив, що "десь загубив" договір.
🚀
Приєднатися до чату ZN.UA


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Херої повертаються і йдуть в атаку.
Дуже сподіваюся на фаєр - шоу при затриманні.
@a_shtirlitz
@a_shtirlitz


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Група ССО України знищила патруль в тилу ворога
Під час проведення розвідки в тилу противника, група ССО помітила ворожий патруль.
Оцінивши обстановку, командиром групи прийнято рішення вступити в бій з противником.
Підтверджено знищення 3 окупантів.
З боку наших воїнів втрат немає.
Навіть в тилу ворог завжди почуватиметься в небезпеці! Працюємо!


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
❗
Украина должна отказаться от идеи возвращения Крыма ради скорейшего окончания вооруженного конфликта с Россией, в ходе которого ежедневно разрушается инфраструктура страны. Такое мнение высказал политический консультант Госдепартамента и Минобороны США Эдвард Люттвак.
"Инфраструктура Украины разрушается ежедневно, и это очень хорошая причина, по которой Украине необходимо закончить войну. Чтобы закончить войну, им необходимо забыть о Крыме", - сказал он в интервью телеканалу РБК. Люттвак отметил, что Украина не сможет вернуть Крым по итогам конфликта с Россией, однако сохранит свою независимость и возможность принимать самостоятельные решения, например, о вступлении в НАТО. "Выбор за Украиной", подчеркнул эксперт.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
😮
 В Одесской области мужчина написал заяву на заместителя мэра города: он обвиняет его в принуждении к половым актам в обмен на непрепятствование предпринимательской деятельности
В Подольске Одесской области в полицию обратился 58-летний мужчина и заявил, что заммэра города
принуждает его к сексу
 в обмен на непрепятствование предпринимательской деятельности. Мужик просит назначить
медицинскую экспертизу своего анального отверстия
, чтобы использовать это как доказательство.
⚓

Хуевая Одесса
 |
Ютуб
Твиттер
 |
Прислать новость


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Российский военкор Сладков выложил видео из уничтоженного российской армией Соледара.
Этот город Россия захватила год назад и просто бросила. В нем больше нет людей и не видно ни одного целого дома.
@kazansky2017


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Путін пройшов шлях від «Мочити в сортирах» до «мовчати у сортирі»
Весь світ побачив слабкість путіна! Її побачили всі - від солдата в окопі під Бахмутом до світових лідерів та лідерів тих країн, які ще підтримували режим путіна.
Так путіна ще ніколи не принижували. Вранці він говорив про «зрадників та зраду» а надвечір – за посередництва Лукашенка вже домовлявся з Прігожиним. Це прояв слабкості, боягузтва та паніки.
Хоч Прігожин і здався, його «похід» чітко показав, яка на росії кругом корупція, бездіяльність та безвідповідальність. Якщо "бунтівники" за день безперешкодно проходять 500 км, то вони не бунтівники. Це – реальна сила у росії!
Цікаво, як тепер до путіна будуть ставитись навіть не світові лідери, а Лукашеко, Токаєв, Мірзійоєв? Про його боягузтво вони всі зрозуміли, коли він благав їх «прикрити його» на параді 9 травня цього року. А тепер вони вкотре переконалися у його слабкості.
@operatyvnii


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Кандидат на посаду судді Конституційного Суду України не знає, коли прийняли Конституцію!
Бо для нього ця посада не про професійність та високу кваліфікацію.
А скільки ще таких «ерудитів» носять суддівські мантії і звершують правосуддя?


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
«Сьогодні за Дніпро!», «Хтось повинен зупинити цю тварюку», «По мавзолею! Прах до праху» — пишите ви і донатите на підтримку нашої армії.
Наші Сили Оборони — це ті, хто може реалізувати помсту росіянам. Знищити, розтрощити, розтоптати ворога. Кожну потвору, яка пролізла на нашу землю калічити та вбивати наш народ.
Дякуємо всім та кожному, хто своїм внеском дозволяє нам забезпечувати Сили Оборони всім необхідним! Це рятує життя наших бійців та допомагає їм зменшувати кількість наших ворогів.
Не маємо права зупинитись!


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
👨⚕
 Іксодові кліщі, які живуть в траві та зрідка потрапляють на невисокі кущові рослини, можуть переносити багато хвороб. Найпоширенішими з них в Україні є кліщовий вірусний енцефаліт та бореліоз, більш відому як хвороба Лайма.
🔎

Кліщовий енцефаліт
Це запалення головного мозку, що як наслідок, може  призвести до паралічу та смерті пацієнта. Специфічних ліків проти енцефаліту немає – тільки симптоматичне лікування вдома чи в лікарні в разі важкого перебігу.
Найкращий захист від кліщового енцефаліту – це завчасна вакцинація дітей та дорослих.
🔎

Хвороба Лайма (бореліоз)
Первинними симптомами цієї хвороби є гарячка, головний біль, сильна втома та часто – характерна червона пляма в місці укусу (еритема), яка з часом більшає і стає схожою на мішень. Іншими проявами хвороби Лайма можуть бути біль у суглобах, серці (кардит) чи частковий параліч обличчя або шиї.
Якщо в перші тижні, а краще – дні, не зупинити хворобу Лайма курсом антибіотиків або не завершити її лікування, вона перейде в хронічну форму, яка не піддається ефективній медикаментозній терапії.
❗

Що робити, якщо ви виявили на собі кліща:
☛
 Якщо ви виявили на собі кліща - якнайшвидше видаліть його самостійно або зверніться до найближчого медзакладу.
☛
 Обробіть місце укусу хлоргексидином, водою з милом, спиртом тощо.
☛
 Одразу зв’яжіться із сімейним лікарем: очно чи дистанційно.
☛
 Отримайте рецепт на антибіотик, потрібний для знищення борелій, які, можливо, вам передалися.
☛
 Повністю закінчіть призначений лікарем курс антибіотиків, не перериваючи його.
☛
 Будьте уважні до симптомів хвороби Лайма після лікування – можливо, буде потрібен другий етап терапії.
Більше читайте
тут


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Пилот упавшего российского самолета Су-25 правильно отметил 23 февраля - разбил самолет и получил травмы несовместимые с жизнью.
@kazansky2017


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
⚡
Армия РФ накапливает ракеты для ударов по критической инфраструктуре Украины с наступлением холодов
 -
Минобороны Великобритании
Как
 отмечается, самолеты дальней авиации ВВС РФ
не наносили ударов по Украине с 21 сентября
, в течение 21 дня. Такие перерывы являются чем-то необычным.
Инсайдер UA  | Подписаться


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Ювенальні прокурори: 480 дітей загинуло в Україні внаслідок збройної агресії рф
🔷
 Станом на ранок 12 травня 2023 року більше ніж 1448 дітей постраждали в Україні внаслідок повномасштабної збройної агресії рф. За офіційною інформацією ювенальних прокурорів 480 дітей загинули та понад 968 отримали поранення різного ступеню тяжкості.
🔹
Ці цифри не остаточні. Триває робота з їх встановлення в місцях ведення бойових дій, на тимчасово окупованих та звільнених територіях.
🔹
Найбільше постраждало дітей у Донецькій області - 455, Харківській - 275, Київській - 128, Херсонській - 97, Запорізькій - 89, Миколаївській - 89, Чернігівській - 70, Дніпропетровській - 69, Луганській - 66.
🔹
11 травня внаслідок обстрілу смт. Великий Бурлук Харківської області травмовано 16-річну дівчину.

👧🏻
🧒🏻

«Діти війни»
 - платформа, на яку можна повідомити та знайти всю інформацію про дітей, які постраждали внаслідок війни рф проти України.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
❗
росіяни вигадали собі, що десь між житловими будинками в Києві був бункер "зама Залужного", і вони його знищили
🤡
✅

Підписка

📩

Надіслати новину


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User] Україна і Латвія підписали довгострокову безпекову угоду. Латвія надаватиме Україні військову допомогу на 0,25% ВВП щороку.


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
#ЦПД_розвінчує
:
❌
 Ворожі
TG-канали поширюють наказ буцімто від Міністерства оборони України про негайне виселення з домівок жителів Часового Яру для подальшої експлуатації їхнього майна Збройними Силами України
.
✅
 Верифікувавши інформацію в ОТУ «Схід»,
Центр повідомляє, що цей наказ є фейковим і він не має жодного відношення до Міноборони
.
▫
По-перше,
слово «орки», яке є в «документі», не вживається в діловому мовленні
.
▫
По-друге,
оформлення підробленого наказу не відповідає вимогам, встановленим законодавством для оформлення організаційно-розпорядчих документів, зокрема для витягів із наказів
.
▫
По-третє,
накази на відселення – це не компетенція Міністерства оборони
.
‼

Подібні фейки поширюються задля створення паніки, обурення та негативного ставлення до ЗСУ. Мета подібної брехні – дискредитувати українську армію та уряд
.
🙂

TG

FB

INST

YT

TW

TT

WA


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
"До сих пор существуют определенные… я бы не сказала –
симпатии к России, но какое-то чувство недоверчивости по принципу: как можно совершить такое злодейство?" Почему все еще есть сомнения относительно виновников катастрофы на Каховской ГЭС?


[System]
You are an expert in the glittering_generalities manipulation technique. Glittering Generalities: Uses emotionally appealing but vague concepts like 'freedom' and 'justice' without specifics. List phrases that provide evidence of glittering_generalities in the given sentence if they are present. Given the evidence, make a judgement whether the sentence contains the glittering_generalities manipulation.
To improve the classification of texts regarding the usage of Glittering Generalities, consider applying the following guidelines specifically designed to address the issues highlighted in your false positives and negatives.

### 1. **Define Key Characteristics of Glittering Generalities:**
   - **Emotional Appeal:** Focus on whether the statement elicits a strong emotional reaction (e.g., pride, fear, hope).
   - **Vagueness:** Ensure the language used is ambiguous and lacks specificity. Look for words and phrases that sound grand but offer no concrete details.
   - **Potential for Misinterpretation:** Consider if the statement can be reasonably understood in varying contexts, leading to different interpretations.

### 2. **Engage with Context Considerations:**
   - **Contextual Clarity:** Analyze the surrounding context to clearly see if the phrase is being used in a vague manner or if it has a substantiated meaning.
   - **Historical and Cultural Relevance:** Take into account the historical and cultural significance of phrases to determine if they integrate emotion-baiting terms or concepts common to particular narratives or propaganda strategies.

### 3. **Include Semantic Analysis:**
   - **Key Terms Identification:** Create a lexicon of words associated with vague emotional appeal (e.g., freedom, justice, peace). Monitor their usage without accompanying specifics.
   - **NLP Techniques:** Utilize natural language processing tools to identify sentiment and contextual keyword usage. Texts using said phrases ought to be cross-referenced with the key emotional lexicon.

### 4. **Establish Criteria Across Categories:**
   - **Positive Identification:** For a statement to qualify as a Glittering Generality, it should have:
     - An emotionally charged term or phrase (e.g., "victory," "freedom")
     - Lack of specific detail on how such emotional states are achieved or maintained.
   - **Negative Identification:** Statements that provide constructive details or statistics indicating real situations or events should be critically assessed without presuming their emotional appeal influences the classification.

### 5. **Enhance Training Datasets:**
   - **Balance Positive and Negative Examples:** Create a diverse set of training data examples that include real-world instances where terms are both appropriately and inappropriately used to help your model learn nuance.
   - **Dynamic Updates:** Continually update your dataset with new examples that come up in current events or social discourse to stay relevant.

### 6. **Review Feedback Loops:**
   - **User Input Inclusion:** Incorporate feedback from real users, or utilize a team of reviewers to differentiate between emotionally vague statements and concrete, informative content.
   - **Iterative Learning:** Use active learning techniques where the model can be retrained with additional data sourced from its classification mistakes.

### 7. **Develop a Scoring System:**
   - **Create Scores:** Implement a scoring system where texts are graded based on emotional appeal, vagueness, and ambiguity. Statements crossing certain thresholds in these areas may be flagged as Glittering Generalities.
   - **Threshold Adjustment:** Regularly tune the scoring metrics to reduce false positives and negatives based on ongoing classifications.

### 8. **Focus on Practical Scenarios:**
   - **Test Real-Life Content:** Apply these guidelines to actual articles, posts, and comments from political discussions regularly to refine the model's understanding of the concept in the wild.

Following these guidelines systematically will increase the classifier's proficiency in distinguishing between statements that genuinely exemplify the Glittering Generalities technique and those that should not. It moves the focus from simply identifying emotional language to understanding how such language operates within context and conveys a message (or lack thereof) effectively.

[User]
Cпикер Джонсон ищет повод, чтобы не ставить законопроект о помощи Украине на голосование — Белый дом
У пресс-секретаря Белого дома Карин Жан-Пьер попросили
прокомментировать
 заявление спикера Палаты представителей Майка Джонсона о том, что "в умах многих людей существует большое различие между летальной помощью Украине и гуманитарным компонентом", и спросили, рассматривают ли в администрации президента США возможность вынести законопроект о военной помощи Украине отдельно, чтобы он не содержал пунктов о гуманитарной помощи.
"Дополнение к закону о национальной безопасности может получить большинство в Палате представителей. Это то, что мы знаем. Мы понимаем, что это правда. Он может получить подавляющую поддержку, а это означает, что он включает как республиканцев, так и демократов, если его просто вынесут на голосование", — подчеркнула Жан-Пьер.
Она добавила, что спикер "ищет неоправданный повод, который не нужен".
"Мы знаем, что если бы он поставил законопроект на голосование, он бы прошел", — резюмировала Жан-Пьер.
@dmytrogordon_official